Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding changes in Māori incomes and income inequality 1997–2003

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines recent changes in weekly income levels and dispersion for Māori, New Zealand’s indigenous ethnic group. Changes in the Māori income distribution between 1997 and 2003 reflect rapid increases in economic growth and employment rate. A reduced proportion of people had zero or benefit-level incomes and a higher proportion had high incomes. Income inequality declined for working-aged Māori and was stable for employed Māori. The average income gap between Māori and Europeans declined. The increased Māori employment rate during this period was the single most important driver of changes in the Māori income distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 2001, 84% of Māori lived in urban areas, compared with 86% of all New Zealanders. About half of Māori adults who were married or partnered in 1996 had non-Māori partners (Callister 2003, unpublished paper; available at http://www.msd.govt.nz/events/conferences/social-policy-03/abstracts-papers-presentations/3.18.html).

  2. In 2001, for example, the average gross weekly income of adult Māori was 77% of the average gross weekly income of adult Europeans. Australian Bureau of Statistics figures indicate that the median weekly gross income of indigenous peoples in 2001 was 59% of that of non-indigenous people. The average annual income of aboriginal peoples in Canada in 1995 was 62% of the figure for the non-Aboriginal population (Statistics Canada 2001, p.6).

  3. The imputation methods are described in Dixon and Maré (2004).

  4. The investment income figures that have been collected since 2002 show that investment income is a very small component of Māori weekly incomes. It is a more significant component of the weekly incomes of Europeans; therefore, the exclusion of investment income is likely to bias Māori-European income comparisons to some small degree.

  5. The ‘optimal’ bandwidths for the main income distributions considered in this paper are as follows: 0.108 for all Europeans, 0.067 for employed Europeans, 0.135 for all Māori and 0.087 for employed Māori.

  6. Whilst many respondents report their benefit income in after-tax terms, Statistics New Zealand converts these values to the pre-tax equivalent.

  7. The modified weights and clustering information were supplied by Statistics New Zealand.

  8. The 50–10 percentile difference is not defined because the 10th percentile was at zero in 1997–1998.

  9. Note that non-employed Māori, on average, had much higher incomes than non-employed Europeans. This is almost certainly due to a higher level of benefit eligibility among Māori. Table 2 gives the proportion of each ethnic group with some benefit income in the survey reference week.

  10. Or correlated with other unmeasured attributes that are differentially rewarded in the labour market.

  11. For other recent applications of the DiNardo, Fortin and Lemieux method, see Hyslop and Maré 2005, Wilkins 2003, and Barsky et al. 2002.

  12. This summary draws on Hyslop and Maré (2005) and Wilkins (2003).

  13. The re-weighting could also be carried out using 2002–2003 as the base year and adjusting attributes to match their 1997–1998 distribution. This variation leads to slightly different results, but does not materially alter the patterns and effects reported here.

References

  • Barsky R, Bound J, Charles K, Lupton J (2002) Accounting for the black–white wealth gap: a nonparametric approach. J Am Stat Assoc 97:663–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple S (1999) Explaining patterns of disparity between Māori and non-Māori employment chances. Labour Mark Bull 51(1):70–100. Available at http://www.dol.govt.nz

  • DiNardo J, Fortin NM, Lemieux T (1996) Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: a semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64(5):1001–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon S, Maré D (2004) Understanding changes in Māori incomes and income inequality 1997–2003. Motu working paper 2004-12. Available at http://www.motu.org.nz/motu_wp_2004_12.htm

  • Dixon S, Maré D (2005) Changes in the Māori income distribution: evidence from the population census. Motu working paper 2005-06. Available at http://www.motu.org.nz/motu_wp_2005_06.htm

  • Gibson J, Scrimgeour F (2004) Māori in the 21st century: wealth, resources and institutions. Paper presented at the 48th Annual conference of the Australian agricultural and resource economics society, Melbourne, 11–13 February 2004

  • Hyslop D, Maré D (2005) Understanding New Zealand’s changing income distribution 1983–98: a semiparametric analysis. Economica 72(3):469–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan V, Jensen J (2005) Trends in economic wellbeing: changing patterns in New Zealand 1989–2001. Ministry of social development, Wellington. Available at http://www.msd.govt.nz/work-areas/social-research/trends-in-economic-wellbeing.html

  • Maani S (2000) Secondary and tertiary educational attainment and income levels for Māori and non-Māori over time. New Zealand treasury working paper 2000/18. Available at http://www.treasury.govt.nz/workingpapers/2000/00-18.asp

  • Maani S (2002) Education and Māori relative income levels over time: the mediating effect of occupation, industry, hours of work and locality. New Zealand treasury working paper 2002/17. Available at http://www.treasury.govt.nz/workingpapers/2002/02-17.asp

  • Maani S (2004) Why have Māori relative income levels deteriorated over time? Econ Rec 80(248):101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2001) Aboriginal peoples in Canada. Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics Profile Series, Statistics Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics New Zealand (1999) New Zealand now—incomes. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins R (2003) Immigrant and native-born earnings distributions in Australia: 1982–1996. Australian Journal of Labour Economics 6(1):83–115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, and the financial support of the Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. Access to the data used in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand under conditions designed to give effect to the security and confidentiality provisions of the Statistics Act 1975. The authors thank Robert Templeton and Jonathan Khoo for their valuable assistance with the calculation of sampling errors. They also thank Steven Stillman and three anonymous referees for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Maré.

Additional information

Responsible editor Deborah Cobb-Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, S., Maré, D.C. Understanding changes in Māori incomes and income inequality 1997–2003. J Popul Econ 20, 571–598 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0083-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0083-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation