Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison and classification of 3D objects surface point clouds on the example of feet

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Machine Vision and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main tasks of shoe manufacturing is the production of well fitting shoes for different specialized markets. The key to conduct this properly is the analysis of the factors that influence the variations of the foot shape. In this paper methods and results of clustering and analysis of 3D foot surfaces are presented. The data were collected from a study with more than 12,000 feet that have been laser-scanned. The database contains point clouds acquired from persons coming from different regions of the world. Furthermore, additional personal data were collected. Two different methods for quantifying the similarity of 3D surface point clouds are therefore developed. The first method generally works on nearly arbitrary 3D surface point clouds, while the second one is specialized on foot data sets. These similarity measures were used on the data sets of the foot-shape study, together with clustering and feature quality evaluation methods. The purpose was to obtain information about the impact of, and the relationship among, the different factors influencing the shape of a foot. Through the observations of the experiments presented here it was possible to build up a hierarchy of different levels of feature-groups determined by their impact on the foot shape. Furthermore, an investigation of the quality and amount of impact of the features, according to their ability to separate specific subgroups of persons, is shown. Based on these results it was possible to select those features, which result in the largest effect when designing shoes for e.g. the Asian versus European markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wunderlich R., Cavanagh P.: Gender difference in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 33(4), 605–611 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luximon A., Goonetilleke R., Tsui K.: The customer centric enterprise. Advantages of mass customization and personalization. Footwear Fit Categorization 29, 491–499 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mochimaru M., Kouchi M., Dohi M.: Analysis of 3-D human foot forms using the free form deformation method and its application in grading shoe lasts. Ergonomics 43(9), 1301–1313 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leng J., Du R.: A deformation method for shoe last customization. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2(1–4), 11–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chellappa R., Wilson C., Sirohey S.: Human and machine recognition of faces: a survey. Pro. IEEE 83(4), 705–740 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heisele B., Serre T., Pontil M., Vetter T., Poggio T.: Categorization by learning and combining object parts. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2(14), 1239–1245 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bustos B., Keim D., Saupe D., Schreck T., Vranic̀ D.: An experimental effectiveness comparison of methods for 3D similarity search. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 6(1), 39–54 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sammon J., John W.: A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-18, 401–409 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tillmann C., Ney H.: Word reordering and a dynamic programming beam search algorithm for statistical machine translation. Comput. Linguist. 29(1), 97–133 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Grimmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grimmer, R., Eskofier, B., Schlarb, H. et al. Comparison and classification of 3D objects surface point clouds on the example of feet. Machine Vision and Applications 22, 235–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-009-0230-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-009-0230-y

Keywords

Navigation