Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What’s new in cardiogenic shock?

  • What's New in Intensive Care
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

1Adapted from [3]

References

  1. Mebazaa A, Combes A, van Diepen S et al (2018) Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. Intensive Care Med 44:760–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5214-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thiele H, Ohman EM, de Waha-Thiele S et al (2019) Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019. Eur Heart J 40:2671–2683. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Puymirat E, Fagon JY, Aegerter P et al (2017) Cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: evolution of prevalence, patient profile, management and outcomes, 1997–2012. Eur J Heart Fail 19:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S et al (2019) SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: this document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 94:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jentzer JC, van Diepen S, Barsness GW et al (2019) Cardiogenic Shock classification to predict mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol 74:2117–2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M et al (2017) PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 377:2419–2432. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1710261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M et al (2018) One-year outcomes after PCI strategies in cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 379:1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1808788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neumann F-J, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A et al (2019) 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 40:87–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy B, Clere-Jehl R, Legras A et al (2018) Epinephrine versus norepinephrine for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Léopold V, Gayat E, Pirracchio R et al (2018) Epinephrine and short-term survival in cardiogenic shock: an individual data meta-analysis of 2583 patients. Intensive Care Med 44:847–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5222-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuernau G, Beck J, Desch S et al (2019) Mild hypothermia in cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. Circulation 139:448–457. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tehrani BN, Truesdell AG, Sherwood MW et al (2019) Standardized team-based care for cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:1659–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Thelemann N et al (2018) Intraaortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: long-term 6-year outcome of the randomized IABP-shock II trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thiele H, Jobs A, Ouweneel DM et al (2017) Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 38:3523–3531. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schrage B, Ibrahim K, Loehn T et al (2019) Impella support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Circulation 139:1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP et al (2019) The evolving landscape of impella® use in the united states among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with mechanical circulatory support. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Combes A, Brodie D, Chen Y-S et al (2017) The ICM research agenda on extracorporeal life support. Intensive Care Med 43:1306–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4803-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abrams D, Garan AR, Abdelbary A et al (2018) Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults. Intensive Care Med 44:717–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5064-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Danial P, Hajage D, Nguyen LS et al (2018) Percutaneous versus surgical femoro-femoral veno-arterial ECMO: a propensity score matched study. Intensive Care Med 44:2153–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5442-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP Hôpital Pitié–Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France

    Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Dirk W. Donker & Alain Combes

  2. Intensive Care Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Dirk W. Donker

  3. Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, 75013, Paris, France

    Alain Combes

Authors
  1. Marc Pineton de Chambrun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk W. Donker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alain Combes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Combes.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr Donker reported speaker fees and research cooperation with Gettinge-Maquet and Fresenius-Xenios-NovaLung. Dr Combes reported receiving grants and personal fees from Maquet and Baxter. Dr Pineton reported no conflict of interest in relation with this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Chambrun, M.P., Donker, D.W. & Combes, A. What’s new in cardiogenic shock?. Intensive Care Med 46, 1016–1019 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05973-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05973-z

Search

Navigation