Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of coercive measures in adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment: a nation-wide register study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the extent and trends in the use of seclusion/restraint in psychiatric inpatient treatment of adolescents aged 12–17 years in Finland.

Methods

The National Hospital Discharge Register data comprising all psychiatric inpatient treatment periods of 12- to 17 year-olds in Finland during the period 1996–2003 was used. Time trends, regional variation and patient characteristics related to the risk of being subjected to seclusion/restraint in psychiatric inpatient treatment are reported.

Results

The average prevalence of use of seclusion and restraint was 1.71/10,000/year over the study period. Use of seclusion/restraint in adolescent psychiatric inpatient care first increased, peaking in 1999–2001, and then decreased. The decrease occurred after stricter legislative control of use of seclusion/restraint was introduced in 2002, despite that involuntary treatment periods did not decrease. Considerable regional variation was seen in the use of seclusion/restraint. A greater proportion of girls than boys were secluded/restrained. Seclusion/restraint was most common in schizophrenia, mood disorders and conduct disorder.

Conclusions

Legislative control had the desired immediate impact on the use of seclusion/restraint in adolescent psychiatric inpatient care. Legislative control is, however, not strong enough to ensure homogenous practices across the country, as there is many-fold regional variation in figures for using seclusion and restraint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gaskin CJ, Elsom SJ, Happell B (2007) Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities: review of literature. Br J Psychiatry 191:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sailas E, Fenton M (2002) Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD001163

  3. Steinert T, Lepping P, Bernhardsgütter R, Conca A, Hatling T, Keski-Valkama A, Mayoral F, Whittington R (2010) Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45:889–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto A-M, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2007) A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:747–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salib E, Ahmed AG, Cope M (1998) Practice of seclusion: a five-year retrospective review in north Cheshire. Med Sci Law 38:321–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crenshaw WB, Cain KA, Francis PS (1997) An updated national survey on seclusion and restraint. Psychiatr Serv 48:395–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gullick K, McDermott B, Stone P, Gibbon P (2005) Seclusion of children and adolescents: psychopathological and family factors. Int J Ment Health Nurs 14:37–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fryer M, Beech M, Byrne G (2004) Seclusion use with children and adolescents: an Australian experience. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 38:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Donovan A, Plant R, Peller A, Siegel L, Martin A (2003) Two-year trends in the use of seclusion and restraint among psychiatrically hospitalized youths. Psychiatr Serv 54:987–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaltiala-Heino R (2004) Increase in involuntary psychiatric admission of minors: a register study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siponen U, Välimäki M, Kaivosoja M, Marttunen M, Kaltiala-Heino R (2007) Increase in involuntary psychiatric treatment and child welfare placements in Finland 1996–2003: a nationwide register study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaltiala-Heino R, Korkeila J, Tuohimäki C, Tuori T, Lehtinen V (2000) Coercion and restrictions in psychiatric inpatient treatment. Eur Psychiatry 15:213–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaltiala-Heino R, Tuohimäki C, Korkeila J, Lehtinen V (2003) Reasons for using seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient care. Int J Law Psychiatry 26:139–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Prinsen EJ, van Delden JJ (2009) Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry? J Med Ethics 35:325–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pylkkänen K (2003) Care guarantee in adolescent psychiatry. Final report of the NUOTTA project 2003. Rep Ministr Soc Aff Health 2003:13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Siponen U, Välimäki M, Kaivosoja M, Marttunen M, Kaltiala-Heino R (2011) A comparison of two hospital districts with low and high figures in the compulsory care of minors: an ecological study. Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol (Epub ahead of print)

  17. Lay B, Nordt C, Rössler W (2011) Variation in use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals. Eur Psychiatry 26:244–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto AM, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2010) Who are the restrained and secluded patients: a 15-year nationwide study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 45:1087–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krakowski M, Czobor P (2004) Gender differences in violent behaviors: relationship to clinical symptoms and psychosocial factors. Am J Psychiatry 161(3):459–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moretti MM, Odgers CL (2002) Aggressive and violent girls: prevalence, profiles and contributing factors. In: Corrado RR, Roesch R, Hart SD, Gierowski JK (eds) Multi-problem violent youth: a foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions and outcomes. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 116–129

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Van Dorn RA, Elbogen EB, Wagner HR, Rosenheck RA et al (2006) A national study of violent behavior in persons with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63(5):490–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaltiala-Heino R (2010) Involuntary commitment and detainment in adolescent psychiatric inpatient care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 45:785–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Link BG, Stueve A, Phelan J (1998) Psychotic symptoms and violent behaviors: probing the components of “threat/control-override” symptoms. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 33(S1):S55–S60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gammelgård M, Koivisto AM, Eronen M, Kaltiala-Heino R (2010) Violence risk and psychopathology in institutionalised adolescents. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 21(6):933–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher WA (1994) Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Psychiatry 151:1584–1591

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Joshi P, Capozzoli J, Coyle J (1988) Use of a quiet room on an inpatient unit. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:642–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Antoinette T, Iynegar S, Puig-Antich J (1990) Is locked seclusion necessary for children under 14? Am J Psychiatry 147:1283–1289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cotton N (1995) Seclusion as therapeutic management: an invited commentary. Am J Orthopsychiatry 65:245–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Masters KJ, Bellonci C, Bernett W, Arnold V, Beitchman J, Benson RS et al (2002) Practice parameter for the prevention and management of aggressive behavior in child and adolescent psychiatric institutions, with special reference to seclusion and restraint. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41(suppl 2):4S–25S

    Google Scholar 

  30. Barnett SR, dosReis S, Riddle MA (2002) Maryland youth practise improvement committee. Improving the management of acute aggression in state residential and inpatient psychiatric facilities for youths. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41:897–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Nursing Association and National Association for Psychiatric Health Systems (2003) Learning from each other. Success stories and ideas for reducing restraint/seclusion in behavioural health. Retrieved March 26 2010 from http://www.naphs.org

  32. dosReis S, Barnett S, Love RC, Ridle MA, Maryland Youth Practise Improvement Committee (2003) A guide for managing acute aggressive behavior of youths in residential and inpatient treatment facilities. Psychiatr Serv 54:1357–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Donat D (2003) An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatr Serv 54:1119–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lebel J, Goldstein R (2005) The economic cost of using restraint and the value added by restraint reduction or elimination. Psychiatr Serv 56(9):1109–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaltiala-Heino R, Berg J, Selander M, Työläjärvi M, Kahila K (2007) Aggression management in an adolescent forensic unit. Int J Forensic Ment Health 6:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sees D (2009) Impact of the health care financing administration regulations on restraint and seclusion usage in the acute psychiatric settings. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 23(4):277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Niveau G (2004) Preventing human rights abuses in psychiatric establishments: the work of the CPT. Eur Psychiatry 19:146–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto AM, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2010) The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: a nationwide 15-year study. Nord J Psychiatry 64:136–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaltiala-Heino Riittakerttu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulla, S., Maritta, V. & Riittakerttu, KH. The use of coercive measures in adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment: a nation-wide register study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47, 1401–1408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0456-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0456-7

Keywords

Navigation