Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Risk behaviours, victimisation and mental distress among adolescents in different family structures

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have shown an elevated risk with regard to social and behavioural domains in adolescents of single parents. However, the diversity of single parent families concerning gender of the resident parent has seldom been taken into account when investigating the relation between family structure and children’s negative outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate risk behaviours, victimisation and mental distress among adolescents in different family structures using more detailed sub-groups of single parents (i.e., single mother, single father and shared physical custody).

Methods

The sample consisted of 15,428 ninth graders from all municipal and private schools in the county of Stockholm (response rate 83.4%). Risk behaviours included use of alcohol, illicit drugs and smoking. Victimisation was measured by experiences of exposure to bullying and physical violence. Mental distress was assessed with the anxious/depressed and aggressive behaviour syndrome scales in the Youth Self Report (YSR). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the associations between family structure and outcome variables.

Results

Adolescents in single-mother/father families were at higher risk of risk behaviours, victimisation and mental distress than their counterparts in two-parent families. However, after control for possible confounders the associations between victimisation, aggressive behaviour problems and single motherhood were no longer significant, whereas these relations remained for children living with single fathers. Adolescents in shared physical custody run no increased risk of any of the studied outcomes (except drunkenness) after adjustment for covariates. Post hoc analyses revealed that adolescents in single-father families were at higher risk for use of alcohol, illicit drugs, drunkenness, and aggressive behaviour as compared to their peers in single-mother families, whereas no differences were found between adolescents in single-mother families and those in shared physical custody.

Conclusions

Children of single parents should not be treated as a homogenous group when planning prevention and intervention programmes. Researchers and professionals should be aware of and consider the specific problems of single parent children and that their problems may vary depending on their living arrangements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achenbach TM (1991) Manual for the youth self-report and profile. Burlington, University of Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amato PR (2000) The consequences of divorce for adults and children. J Marriage Fam 62:1269–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amato PR, Keith B (1991) Parental divorce and the well-being of children: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 110:26–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amato PR, Gilbreth JG (1999) Non-resident fathers and children’s wellbeing: A meta-analysis. J Marriage Fam 61:557–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauserman R (2002) Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole custody arrangements: a meta-analytic review. J Fam Psychol 16:91–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bjarnason T, Andersson B, Choquet M., Elekes Z, Morgan M, Rapinett G (2003) Alcohol culture, family structure and adolescent alcohol use: multilevel modeling of frequency of heavy drinking among 15–16 year old students in 11 European countries. J Stud Alcohol 64:200–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchanan CM, Maccoby EE, Dornbusch SM (1992) Adolescents and their families after divorce: three residential arrangements compared. J Res Adolesc 2:261–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchanan CM, Maccoby EE, Dornbusch SM (1996) Adolescents after divorce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burström B, Diderichsen F, Shouls S, Whitehead M (1999) Lone mothers in Sweden: trends in health and socioeconomic circumstances, 1979–1995. J Epidemiol Commun H 53:750–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou LC, Ho CY, Chen CY, Chen WJ (2006) Truancy and illicit drug use among adolescents surveyed via street outreach. Addict Behav 31:149–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke-Stewart KA, Hayward C (1996) Advantages of father custody and contact for the psychological well-being of school age children. J Appl Dev Psychol 17:239–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cookston JT (1999) Parental supervision and family structure: effects on adolescent problem behaviors. J Divorce Remarriage 32:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Curtner-Smith ME, MacKinnon-Lewis CE (1994) Family process effects on adolescent males’ susceptibility to antisocial peer pressure. Fam Relat 43:462–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Demo DH, Acock AC (1988) The impact of divorce on children. J Marriage Fam 50:619–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Demuth S, Brown SL (2004) Family structure, family processes, and adolescent delinquency: the significance of parental absence versus parental gender. J Res Crime Delinq 41:58–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dodge KA, Petit GS, Bates JE (1994) Socialization mediators of the relation between socioeconomic status and child conduct problems. Child Dev 65:649–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dornbusch SM, Carlsmith JM, Bushwall SJ, Ritter PL, Leiderman H, Hastorf AH, Gross RT (1985) Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents. Child Dev 56:326–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dunn J, Deater-Deckard K, Pickering K, O’Connor TG (1998) Children’s adjustment and prosocial behaviour in step-, single-parent, and non-stepfamily settings: findings from a community study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39:1083–1095

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Flewelling R, Bauman K (1990) Family structure as a predictor of initial substance use and sexual intercourse in early adolescence. J Marriage Fam 52:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garnefski N, Diekstra RF (1997) Adolescents from one parent, stepparent and intact families: emotional problems and suicide attempts. J Adolesc 20:201–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Glover RJ, Steele C (1989) Comparing the effects on the child of post-divorce parenting arrangements. J Divorce 12:185–201

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gore S, Aseltine RH, Colton ME (1992) Social structure, life stress, and depressive symptoms in a high school-aged population. J Health Soc Behav 33:97–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Griffin KW, Botvin GJ, Scheier LM, Diaz TL, Miller NL (2000) Parenting practices as predictors of substance use, delinquency, and aggression among urban minority youth: moderating effects of family structure and gender. Psychol Addict Behav 14:174–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grych JH, Fincham FD (1992) Interventions for children of divorce: toward greater integration of research and action. Psychol Bull 111:434–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Haddad T (1998) Custody arrangements and the development of emotional or behavioural problems in children. Ottawa: Human Resources Development Canada, Applied Research Branch

  26. Hilton JM, Devall EL (1998) Comparison of parenting and children’s behavior in single-mother, single-father, and intact families. J Divorce Remarriage 29:23–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffman JP, Johnson RA (1998) A national portrait of family structure and adolescent drug use. J Marriage Fam 60:633–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jenkins JE, Zunguze ST (1998) The relationship of family structure to adolescent drug use, peer affiliation, and perception of peer acceptance of drug use. Adolescence 33:811–822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Joshi HE, Cooksey E, Wiggins RD, McCulloch A, Verropoulou G, Clarke L (1999) Diverse family living situations and child development: a multi-level analysis comparing longitudinal evidence from Britain and the United States. Int J Law Policy Fam 13:292–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kline M, Tschann JM, Johnston JR, Wallersttein JS (1989) Children’s adjustment in joint and sole physical custody families. Dev Psychol 25:430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kohn L, Dramaix M, Favresse D, Kittel F, Piette D (2005) Trends in cannabis use and its determinants among teenagers in the French-speaking community of Belgium. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 53:3–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kurdek LA, Fine MA, Sinclair RJ (1995) School adjustment in sixth graders: parenting transitions, family climate, and peer norm effects. Child Dev 66:430–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Laumann-Billings L, Emery RE (2000) Distress among young adults in divorced families. J Fam Psychol 14:671–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ledoux S, Miller P, Choquet M, Plant M (2002) Family structure, parent–child relationships, and alcohol and other drug use among teenagers in France and the United Kingdom. Alcohol 37:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  35. Licanin I, Redzic A (2005) Alcohol abuse and risk behavior among adolescents in larger cities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Med Arh 59:164–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lindberg L, Larsson N, Bremberg S (1999) Ungdomars psykiska hälsa. Utvärdering av ett mätinstrument. Samhällsmedicin, Huddinge (in Swedish)

  37. Lipman EL, Offord DR, Dooley MD (1996) What do we know about children from single-mother families? Questions and answers from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. I Growing Up in Canada: National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Ottawa, Statistics Canada

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lipsey MW, Derzon JH (1998) Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescences and early adulthood. In: Loeber IR, Farrington DP (eds) Serious and violent juvenile offenders. Risk factors and successful interventions. Sage, London

  39. Luoma I, Puura K, Tamminen T, Kaukonen P, Piha J, Rasanen E, Kumpulainen K, Moilanen I, Koivisto AM, Almqvist F (1999) Emotional and behavioural symptoms in 8–9-year-old children in relation to family structure. Eur Child Adoles Psy 8:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McMunn AM, Nazrooa JY, Marmota MG, Borehamb R, Goodmanc R (2001) Children’s emotional and behavioural well-being and the family environment: findings from the Health Survey for England. Soc Sci Med 53:423–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McLanahan SS (1999) Father absence and children’s welfare. In: Hetherington EM (ed) Coping with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage: a risk and resiliency perspective. Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ

  42. McLanahan SS, Sandefur G (1994) Growing up with a single parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  43. Miller PM (1997) Family structure, personality, drinking, smoking and illicit drug use: a study of UK teenagers. Drug Alcohol Depen 45:121–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Naevdal F, Thuen F (2004) Residence arrangements and well-being: a study of Norwegian adolescents. Scand J Psychol 45:363–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Neugebauer R (1989) Divorce, custody, and visitation: the child’s point of view. J Divorce 12:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  46. Peterson JL, Zill N (1986) Marital disruption, parent–child relationships, and behavior problems in children. J Marriage Fam 48:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pike L (2000) Single mum or single dad? The effects of parent residency arrangements on the development of primary school-aged children. Western Australia, Edith Cowen University

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ringbäck Weitoft GR, Haglund B, Hjern A, Rosen M (2002) Mortality, severe morbidity and injury among long-term lone mothers in Sweden. Int J Epidemiol 31:573–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ringbäck Weitoft G, Hjern A, Haglund B, Rosen M (2003) Mortality, severe morbidity, and injury in children living with single parents in Sweden: a population based study. Lancet 361:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Seiffge-Krenke I, Kollmar F (1998) Discrepancies between mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of sons’ and daughters’ problem behaviour: a longitudinal analysis of parent-adolescent agreement on internalising and externalising problem behavior. J Child Psychol Psy 39:687–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shiller V (1986) Joint versus maternal custody for families with latency age boys: parent characteristics and child adjustment. Am J Orthopsychiatry 56:486–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Simons RL, Lin K, Gordon LC, Conger RD, Lorenz FO (1999) Explaining the higher incidence of adjustment problems among children of divorce compared with those in two-parent families. J Marriage Fam 61:1020–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Statistics Sweden 2005. Demographic reports 2005:2. Children and their families 2004. SCB-Tryck, Örebro. (in Swedish)

  54. The Office of Regional Planning and Urban Transportation (2002) Barn och deras familjer i Stockholms län år 2000. En statistisk studie av barnen och deras levnadsförhållanden. SCB-Tryck, Örebro (in Swedish)

  55. The Office of Regional Planning and Urban Transportation (2003) Barn och deras familjer i Stockholms län år 2003. En statistisk studie av barnen och deras levnadsförhållanden. SCB-Tryck, Örebro. (in Swedish)

  56. Thomson E, McLanahan SS, Curtin RB (1992) Family structure, gender, and parental socialization. J Marriage Fam 54:368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tomori M, Zalar B, Kores Plesnicar B, Ziherl S, Stergar E (2001) Smoking in relation to psychosocial risk factors in adolescents. Eur Child Adoles Psy 10:143–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Verhulst FC, van der Ende J (1992) Agreement between parents’ reports and adolescents’ self-reports of problem behavior. J Child Psychol Psy 33:1011–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wallerstein JS, Kelly JB (1980) Surviving the break-up: how children and parents cope with divorce. New York, Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stockholms Centre for Public Health, Stockholm County Council, Box 17533, 118 91, Stockholm, Sweden

    Beata Jablonska B.Sc. & Lene Lindberg Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Beata Jablonska B.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lene Lindberg Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lene Lindberg Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jablonska, B., Lindberg, L. Risk behaviours, victimisation and mental distress among adolescents in different family structures. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 42, 656–663 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0210-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0210-3

Key words

Search

Navigation