Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The prevalence of postpartum depression

The relative significance of three social status indices

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the prevalence of clinically significant postpartum depression in women of varying social status. The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of postpartum depression as a function of three indices of social status: income, education and occupational prestige.

Method

A sample of 4,332 postpartum women completed a demographic interview and the Inventory to Diagnose Depression, a self-report scale developed to identify a major depressive episode in accordance with DSM diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression was used to assess the relative significance of the three social status variables as risk factors for postpartum depression controlling for the effects of correlated demographic variables.

Results

In the logistic regression, income, occupational prestige, marital status, and number of children were significant predictors of postpartum depression controlling for the effects of other related demographic characteristics. The Wald Chi Square value for each of these significant predictors indicates that income was the strongest predictor.

Conclusions

The prevalence of postpartum depression was significantly higher in financially poor relative to financially affluent women. Maternal depression screening programs targeting women who are financially poor are well placed. Future research is needed to replicate the present findings in a more ethnically diverse sample that includes the full age range of teenage mothers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. Author, Washington, DC

  2. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, Virginia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck CT (2001) Predictors of postpartum depression: an update. Nurs Res 50:275–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belle D, Doucet J (2003) Poverty, inequality, and discrimination as sources of depression among U.S. women. Psychol Women Quart 27:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown GW, Moran PM (1997) Single mothers, poverty and depression. Psychol Med 27:21–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dearing E, Taylor BA, McCartney K (2004) Implications of family income dynamics for women’s depressive symptoms during the first 3 years after childbirth. Am J Public Health 94:1372–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diener E, Biswas-Diener R (2002) Will money increase subjective well-being? Soc Indic Res 57:119–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dohrenwend BP, Dohrenwend BS (1969) Social status and psychological disorder: A causal inquiry. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dohrenwend BP, Schwartz S (1995) Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 8:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans GW, English K (2002) The environment of poverty: multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Dev 73:1238–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T (2005) Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 106:1071–1083

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldston DB, O’Hara MW, Schartz HA (1990) Reliability, validity, and preliminary normative data for the inventory to diagnose depression in a college population. Psychol Assessment 2:212–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gross KH, Wells CS, Radigan-Garcia A, Dietz PM (2002) Correlates of self-reports of being very depressed in the months after delivery: results from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. Matern Child Health J 6:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hobfoll SE, Ritter C, Lavin J, Hulsizer MR, Cameron RP (1995) Depression prevalence and incidence among inner-city pregnant and postpartum women. J Consult Clin Psychol 63:445–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hollingshead AB (1975) Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT

  16. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Howell EA, Mora PA, Horowitz CR, Leventhal H (2005) Racial and ethnic differences in factors associated with early postpartum depressive symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 105:1442–1450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (2000) Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bull World Health Organ 78:413–426

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kreiger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in U.S. public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18:341–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lorant V, Deliege D, Eaton W, Robert A, Phillippot P, Ansseau M (2003) Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 157:98–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Hara MW, Stuart S, Gorman LL, Wenzel A (2000) Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Hara MW, Swain A (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pearlin LI (1989) The sociological study of stress. J Health Soc Behav 30:241–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pires SA, Lazear KJ (2004) Maternal depression workshop. Annie E. Casey Foundation Community Health Summit, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segre LS, Losch ME, O’Hara MW (2006) Race/ethnicity and perinatal depressed mood. J Reproduct Infant Psychol 24:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Segre LS, O’Hara MW (2005) Screening in the U.S. healthcare system. In: Henshaw C, Elliott S (eds) Screening for perinatal depression. Jessica Kinglsey Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Surgeon General (1999) Mental health: Culture, race, ethnicity – Supplement. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC

  28. The Postpartum Depression Law (2006) NJSA 42:2–176

    Google Scholar 

  29. Turner RJ, Wheaton B, Lloyd DA (1995) The epidemiology of social stress. Am Sociol Rev 60:104–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Uehara T, Sato T, Sakado K, Kameda K (1997) Discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression between patients with major depression and pure anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Res 71:57–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wells KB, Miranda J, Bauer MS, et al. (2002) Overcoming barriers to reducing the burden of affective disorders. Biol Psychiatry 52:655–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wisner KL, Peindl KS, Gigliotti T, Hanusa BH (1999) Obsessions and compulsions in women with postpartum depression. J Clin Psychiatry 60:176–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wisner KL, Wheeler SB (1994) Prevention of recurrent postpartum major depression. Hosp Community Psych 45:1191–1196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Corenthal C, Wilson S (1986) A self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:1076–1081

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zimmerman M, Coryell W (1987) The inventory to diagnose depression (IDD): a self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 55:55–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants MH50524 and a supplement to MH59668 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD. (Drs. O’Hara and Stuart, respectively). The authors would like to thank Laura Gorman, Ph.D. for her assistance with this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

    Lisa S. Segre PhD & Michael W. O’Hara PhD

  2. Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Stephan Arndt PhD

  3. Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Scott Stuart MD

Authors
  1. Lisa S. Segre PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael W. O’Hara PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephan Arndt PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Scott Stuart MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa S. Segre PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segre, L.S., O’Hara, M.W., Arndt, S. et al. The prevalence of postpartum depression. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 42, 316–321 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0168-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0168-1

Key words

Search

Navigation