Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing the diagnostic and statistical manual V: what will “statistical” mean in DSM-V?

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In February of 2004, the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) hosted a Launch and Methodology Conference to discuss the role statistics might play in the eventual revision of the Fourth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) and the Ninth Edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD9). The conference consisted of talks on specific topics by statisticians and epidemiologists from North America and Great Britain, followed by group discussion by experts in nosology and psychopathology. We report here on the development of specific themes related to the future interaction between statisticians and nosologists in DSM-V development that arose as a result of that meeting. The themes are related to (1) the nature of the statistician/nosologist interaction; (2) specific areas of concern in that interaction, and (3) the use of novel and complex statistical methods to challenge and inspire new avenues of thinking among nosologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown CH, Liao J (1999) Principles for designing randomized preventive trials in mental health: an emerging developmental epidemiologic paradigm. Am J Community Psychol 27:677–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen J (1983) The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychol Meas 7(3):249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper H, Hedges LV (1994) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn G (2004) Statistical evaluation of measurement errors. 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Embretson SE, Reise S (2000) Item response theory for psychologists. Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  7. Everitt BS, Dunn G (2001) Applied multivariate data analysis. 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press Inc, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kellam SG, Koretz D, Moscicki EK (1999) Core elements of developmental epidemiologically based prevention research. Am J Community Psychol 27:463–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kellam SG, Rebok GW, Mayer LS, Ialongo N, Kalodner CR (1994) Depressive symptoms over first grade and their response to a developmental epidemiological based preventive trial aimed at improving achievement. Dev Psychopathol 6:463–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kessler RC (1995) The epidemiology of psychiatric comorbidity. In: Zahner GEP (ed) Textbook of psychiatric epidemiology. Wiley, New York, pp 179–197

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, et al. (1994) Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:8–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirk SA, Kutchins H (1992) The selling of the DSM: the rhetoric of science in psychiatry. Aldine De Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koran LM (1975) The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments, part 2. N Engl J Med 293:695–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kraemer HC (1992) Evaluating medical tests: objective and quantitative guidelines. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kraemer HC (1995) Statistical issues in assessing comorbidity. Stat Med 14:721–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kraemer HC, Lowe KK, Kupfer DJ (2005) To your health: how to understand what research tells us about risk. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kraemer HC, O’Hara R (2004) Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatr Res 38(1):17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kraemer HC, Thiemann S (1987) How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Light RJ, Singer JD, Willett JB (1990) By design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD (2002) On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods 7(1):19–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Muthen BO (1987) Response to freedman’s critique of path analysis: improve credibility by better methodological training. J Educ Stat 12(2):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muthen BO, Brown CH, Masyn K, Jo B, Khoo ST, Yang CC, et al. (2002) General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics 3:459–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spence MA, Greenberg DA, Hodge SE, Vieland VJ (2003) The emperor’s new methods. Am J Hum Genet 72:1084–1087

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsuang MT, Taylor JL, Faraone SV (2003) Psychiatric genetics: future and prospects. Methods Mol Med 77:251–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang CP, Brown CH, Bandeen-Roche K (2005) Residual diagnostics for growth mixture models. J Am Stat Assoc 100:1054–1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Concepts reviewed in this paper were discussed at a methodology conference convened by the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) on February 18–20, 2004 to launch a DSM-V/ICD-11 research planning conference series. The work was supported by NIMH Grant U13-MH067855. The authors would like to thank all of the participants at the conference and particularly those listed in Table 1. They would also like to thank Paul Sirovatka, MS, for editorial contributions to an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Chmura Kraemer PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kraemer, H.C., Shrout, P.E. & Rubio-Stipec, M. Developing the diagnostic and statistical manual V: what will “statistical” mean in DSM-V?. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 42, 259–267 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0163-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0163-6

Key words

Navigation