Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Features associated with the non-participation and drop out by socially-at-risk children and adolescents in mental-health epidemiological studies

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To study socio-demographic and functional features related with non-collaboration in a longitudinal design of mental health within a high-risk population of individuals 9 and 13 years old.

Method

Regression analyses were used to assess factors affecting the decision to decline participation, and what characteristics both of children and families increase the probability of dropping out once the study had already started.

Results

Refusal of participation at the outset is more probable for lower socioeconomic groups, unemployed families (or with Social Security benefits), minority cultures and children having low school performance. The risk of participants dropping out is higher for adolescents, those who need help at school, are unhealthy, have more life-events, receive professional help for mental problems or have had more psychopathology in previous assessments. Lengthy interviews or evaluations without the return of reports to families are also predictive of drop out.

Conclusions

This study has practical implications for reducing the lack of collaboration in the prospective studies that assess mental health in children and adolescents. Improvement in the estimation of epidemiological indices requires the planning of special measures for research projects carried out on populations with fewer resources so as to recruit individuals with lower SES, adolescents, individuals with pathologies (physical or psychological) and those with lower levels of school achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI::

confidence interval

OR::

ratio

SES::

socioeconomic status

References

  1. Wolf HK, Kuulasmaa K, Tolonen H, Sans S, Molarius A, Eastwood BJ (2005) Effect of sampling frames on response rates in the WHO MONICA risk factor surveys. Eur J Epidemiol 20:293–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayuso J, Vazquez J, Dowrick C, Lehtinen V, Dalgard O, Casey P, et al. (2001) Depressive disorders in Europe: prevalence figures from the ODIN study. Brit J Psychiatry 179:308–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Winter AF, Oldehinkel AJ, Veenstra R, Brunnekreef J, Verhulst FC, Ormel J (2005) Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents. Eur J Epidemiol 20:173–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Loon AJ, Tijhuis M, Picavet HS, Surtees PG, Ormel J (2003) Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations. Ann Epidemiol 13:105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerrits MH, van den Oord EJ, Woogt R (2001) An evaluation of nonresponse bias in peer, self, and teacher ratings of children’s psychosocial adjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42:593–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg M, Chastang JF, Leclerc A, Zins M, Bonenfant S, Bugel I, et al. (2001) Socioeconomic, demographic, occupational, and health factors associated with participation in a long-term epidemiologic survey: a prospective study of the French GAZEL cohort and its target population. Am J Epidemiol 154:373–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heath AC, Howells W, Kirk KM, Madden PA, Bucholz KK, Nelson EC, et al. (2001) Predictors of non-response to a questionnaire survey of a volunteer twin panel: findings from the Australian 1989 twin cohort. Official J Int Society for Twin Studies 4:73–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lundberg I, Thakker K, Hallström T, Forsell Y (2005) Determinants of non-participation and the effects of non-participation on potential cause-effect relationships, in the PART study on mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 40:475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Korkeila K, Suominen S, Ahvenainen J, Ojanlatva A, Rautava P, Helenius H, et al. (2001) Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol 17:991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kringlen E, Torgersen S, Cramer V (2001) A Norwegian psychiatric epidemiological study. Am J Psychiatry 158:1091–1098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McConnell P, Bebbington P, McClelland R, Gillespie K, Houghton S (2002) Prevalence of psychiatric disorder and the need for psychiatric care in Northern Ireland. Population study in the district of Derry. Brit J Psychiatry 181:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bijl RV, van Zessen G, Ravelli A, de Rijk C, Langendoen Y (1998) The Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study (NEMESIS): objectives and design. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 33:581–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vink JM, Willemsen G, Stubbe JH, Middeldorp CM, Ligthart RSL, Baas KD, et al. (2004) Estimating non-response bias in family studies: application to mental health and lifestyle. Eur J Epidemiol 19:623–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reijneveld SA, Stronks K (1999) The impact of response bias on estimates of health care utilization in a metropolitan area: the use of administrative data. Int J Epidemiol 28:1134–1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Voigt LF, Koepsell TD, Daling JR (2003) Characteristics of telephone survey respondents according to willingness to participate. Am J Epidemiol 157:66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brogger J, Bakke P, Eide GE, Gulsvik A (2003) Contribution of follow-up of non-responders to prevalence and risk estimates: a Norwegian respiratory health survey. Am J Epidemiol 157:558–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofler M, Pfister H, Lieb R, Wittchen HU (2005) The use of weights to account for non-response and drop-out. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 40:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boardman HF, Thomas E, Ogden H, Millson DS, Croft PR (2005) A method to determine if consenters to population surveys are representative of the target study population. J Public Health 27:212–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Little RJ, Vartivarian S (2003) On weighting the rates in non-response weights. Stat Med 15:1589–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muth SQ, Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB (2000) Birds of a feather: using a rotational box plot to assess ascertainment bias. Int J Epidemiol 29:899–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wenz R, et al. (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. Brit Med J 324:1183–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ezpeleta L, Guillamón N, Granero R, de la Osa N, Doménech JM, Moya I (In press) Prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents from a Spanish slum. Social Science & Medicine

  23. de la Osa N, Ezpeleta L, Granero R, Doménech JM (2006) Brief Mental Health Screening Questionnaire for children attending to primary care settings. Manuscript submitted for publication

  24. Reich W (2000) Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. de la Osa N, Ezpeleta L, Doménech JM, Navarro JB, Losilla JM (1997) Convergent and discriminant validity of the Structured Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA-R). Psychol Spain 1:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ezpeleta L, de la Osa N, Doménech JM, Navarro JB, Losilla JM (1997) Fiabilidad test-retest de la adaptación española de la Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents - DICA-R. Psicothema 9:529–539

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ezpeleta L, de la Osa N, Júdez J, Doménech JM, Navarro JB, Losilla JM (1997) Diagnostic agreement between clinician and the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents––DICA-R in a Spanish outpatient sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:431–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—IV. Author, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Piacentini JC, Cohen P, Cohen J (1992) Combining discrepant diagnostic information from multiple sources: are complex algorithms better than simple ones? J Abnorm Child Psychol 20:51–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Youngstrom EA, Findling RL, Calabrese JR (2003) Who are the comorbid adolescents? Agreement between psychiatric diagnosis, youth, parent and teacher report. J Abnorm Child Psychol 31:231–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J, Ambrosini P, Fisher P, Bird H, et al. (1983) A Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:1228–1231

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ezpeleta L, Granero R, de la Osa N (1999) Evaluación del deterioro en niños y adolescentes a través de la Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Revista de Psiquiatría Infanto-Juvenil 1:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  33. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & Profiles. University of Vermont - Research Center for Children Youth & Families Burlington VT

    Google Scholar 

  34. Unitat d’Epidemiologia i de Diagnòstic en Psicopatologia del Desenvolupament (1997) Protocolo de Factores de Riesgo. Versión para padres. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Departament de Psicologia de la Salut i de Psicologia Social, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hollingshead AB (1975) Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript—Yale University Department of Sociology, New Haven CT

  36. Kotaniemi JT, Hassi J, Kataja M, Jonsson E, Laitinen LA, Sovijarvi AR, et al. (2001) Does non-responder bias have a significant effect on the results in a postal questionnaire study? Eur J Epidemiol 17:809–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Angold A, Costello EJ, Messer SC, Pickles A, Winder F, Silver D (1995) The development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents. Int J Methods Psychiatric Res 5:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants BS02002-3850 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unitat d’Epidemiologia i de Diagnòstic en Psicopatologia del Desenvolupament, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Rosario Granero Pérez, Lourdes Ezpeleta & José María Domenech

  2. Dept. de Psicobiologia i Metodologia de les Ciències de la Salut, Facultat de Psicologia, Edifici B, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain

    Rosario Granero Pérez

  3. Dept. de Psicologia de la Salut, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Lourdes Ezpeleta

Authors
  1. Rosario Granero Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lourdes Ezpeleta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José María Domenech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosario Granero Pérez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Granero Pérez, R., Ezpeleta, L. & Domenech, J.M. Features associated with the non-participation and drop out by socially-at-risk children and adolescents in mental-health epidemiological studies. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 42, 251–258 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0155-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0155-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation