Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of the Camberwell assessment of need (Chinese version) for patients with schizophrenia at a daycare center of Taiwan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite its wide use in different cultures and languages, there has been no report about the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) in Chinese patients.

Method

Forty-one Chinese chronic schizophrenic patients were interviewed to test the interrater reliability and test–retest reliability of the Chinese version of CAN.

Results

The interrater reliability ranged from 0.82 to 0.98 when computed by intraclass correlations (ICC) for the numbers of needs and from 0.65 to 1.00 by Cohen's κ coefficients for individual domain. The test–retest reliability was moderate to good for the numbers of needs (ICC=0.64–0.81), but varied when counted by Cohen's κ coefficients for individual domain.

Conclusion

Although limited by the homogeneity and small sample size of the study group, this is the first trial of the CAN in Chinese culture. The satisfactory reliability and easy application make this instrument suitable for clinical use in Chinese culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ekdawi MY, Conning AM, Campling JO (1994) Guiding models and philosophies. In: Ekdawi MY, Conning AM, Campling JO (eds) Psychiatric rehabilitation: a practical guide. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 16–35

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conning AM, Rowland LA (1992) Staff attitudes and the provision of individualized care: what determines what we do for people with long-term psychiatric disabilities? J Ment Health 1:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stevens A, Gabbay J (1991) Needs assessment. Health Trends 23:20–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slade M (1994) Needs assessment: involvement of staff and users will help to meet needs. Br J Psychiatry 165:293–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewin CR, Wing JK, Mangen SP et al (1987) Principals and practice of measuring needs in the long-term mentally ill: the MRC needs for care assessment. Psychol Med 17:971–981

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waismann LC, Rowland LA (1989) Ranking of needs: a new method of assessment for use with chronic psychiatric patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 80:260–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall M, Hogg L, Gath DH et al (1995) The cardinal needs schedule: a modified version of the MRC needs for care schedule. Psychol Med 25:605–617

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phelan M, Slade M, Thornicroft G et al (1995) The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 167:589–595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans S, Greenhalgh J, Connelly J (2000) Selecting a mental health needs assessment scale: guidance on the critical appraisal of standardized measures. J Eval Clin Pract 6:379–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Slade M (1996) Assessing the needs of the severely mentally ill: cultural and professional differences. Int J Soc Psychiatry 42:1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slade M, Phelan M, Thornicroft G et al (1996) The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN): comparison of assessments by staff and patients of the needs of the severely mentally ill. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 31:109–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Slade M, Phelan M, Thornicroft G (1998) A comparison of needs assessed by staff and an epidemiologically representative sample of patients with psychosis. Psychol Med 28:543–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slade M, Leese M, Taylor R et al (1999a) The association between needs and quality of life in an epidemiologically representative sample of people with psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 100:149–157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Slade M, Loftus L, Phelan M et al (1999b) The Camberwell Assessment of Need. Gaskell, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leese M, Johnson S, Slade M et al (1998) User perspective on needs and satisfaction with mental health services: the PRiSM psychosis study. 8. Br J Psychiatry 173:409–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson L, Bjorkman T, Svensson B (1995) The assessment of needs in psychiatric patients. Interrater reliability of the Swedish version of the Camberwell Assessment of Needs instrument and results from a cross-sectional study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 92:285–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansson L, Vinding HR, Mackeprang T et al (2001) Comparison of key worker and patient assessment of needs in schizophrenic patients living in the community: a Nordic multicentre study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 103:45–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Issakidis C, Teesson M (1999) Measurement of need for care: a trial of the Camberwell Assessment of Need and the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 33:754–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruggeri M, Lasalvia A, Nicolaou S et al (1999) The Italian version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN), an interview for the identification of needs of care. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 8:135–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lasalvia A, Ruggeri M, Mazzi MA et al (2000) The perception of needs for care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South-Verona outcome project 3. Acta Psychiatr Scand 102:366–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McCrone P, Leese M, Thornicroft G et al (2000) Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need-European version. EPSILON study 6. European psychiatric services: inputs linked to outcome domains and needs. Br J Psychiatry 39(suppl):34–40

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kilian R, Bernert S, Matschinger H et al (2001) The standardized assessment of the need for treatment and support in severe mental illness: the development and testing of the German version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need-EU. Psychiatr Prax 28(suppl):79–83

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arvidsson H (2001) Needs assessed by patients and staff in a Swedish sample of severely mentally ill subjects. Nord J Psychiatry 55:311–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lockwood A, Marshall M (1999) Can a standardized needs assessment be used to improve the care of people with severe mental disorder? A pilot study of ‘needs feedback’. J Adv Nurs 30:1408–1415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeh EK (1992) Development of hospital-community psychiatry in Taiwan: the past and the perspectives. Taiwan J Psychiatr 6(1):47–59

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng NB, Chang TC, Lin YW, Shu CL, Sim CB (2003) Employment needs of individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Taiwan J Psychiatr 17(3):225–231

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tsui SC, Yang YK, Shieh SK, Wu CC, Chen CC (1998) Comparison of family burden and needs of home care service between schizophrenia and bipolar patients. Taiwan J Psychiatr 12(3):188–193

    Google Scholar 

  28. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV), 4th edn. APA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grant from Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan (Grant No. 91-165A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying-Chiao Lee MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeh, HS., Luh, RL., Liu, HJ. et al. Reliability of the Camberwell assessment of need (Chinese version) for patients with schizophrenia at a daycare center of Taiwan. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 41, 75–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0990-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0990-2

Key words

Navigation