Abstract
Background
A review of the main large-scale mental health surveys does not give full support to the idea of urbanicity as a risk factor in mood disorders. Lack of agreement between findings can be attributed, at least in part, to heterogeneous operationalisation of urbanicity, as different ways to define urban and rural areas are likely to lead to different morbidity rates and to have an effect on the respective weight of other risk factors.
Methods
A total of 2,638 subjects sampled from two French regions (Basse-Normandie and Ile-de-France) were interviewed using face-to-face parts of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview covering demographic and certain life event questions. Urbanicity was defined according to (1) official index based on population density or (2) type of dwelling. Participation rates were 85 and 79%.
Results
When gender, age, marital status and certain early life events, such as being placed in an institution, as well as events concerning close family members are entered into a logistic regression, the urbanicity association with DSM-IV MDE and especially severe forms disappeared. This finding tends to support the theory that what happens to individuals is more relevant to depression than the place where they live.
Conclusion
It may be wiser to rely on social indicators than on a rural/urban component for planning for mental health care in the various areas; this remark should not prevent to evaluate the topographic situations of the diverse settings to take them into account to provide appropriate resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews G, Henderson S, Hall W (2001) Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey. Br J Psychiatry 178:145–153
Bijl RV, Ravelli A, van Zessen G (1998) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the general population: results of The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 33:587–595
Blazer D, George LK, Landerman R, Pennybacker M, Melville ML, Woodbury M, Manton KG, Jordan K, Locke B (1985) Psychiatric disorders. A rural/urban comparison. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:651–656
Brown GW, Prudo R (1981) Psychiatric disorders in a rural and an urban population: 1. Aetiology of depression. Psychol Med 11:581–599
Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, Wittchen HU, Kendler KS (1994) Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:8–19
Kovess V, Murphy HB, Tousignant M (1987) Urban–rural comparisons of depressive disorders in French Canada. J Nerv Ment Dis 175:457–466
Kovess V, Gysens S, Poinsard R, Chanoit PF, Labarte S (1999) Mental health and use of care by people receiving French social benefits. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 34:588–594
Kovess V, Fournier L, Lesage AD, Lebigre FA, Caria A (2001) Two validation studies of the CIDIS: a simplified version of the composite international diagnostic interview. Psychiatr Netw 4:10–24
Kovess V, Labarte S, Chanoit PF (2002) La santé mentale en région Ile de France: des données épidémiologiques à la planification [Mental health in the Ile-de-France region: from epidemiological data to forward planning]. Inf Psychiatr 1:43–55
Lewis G, Booth M (1994) Are cities bad for your mental health? Psychol Med 24:913–915
Parikh SV, Wasylenki D, Goering P, Wong J (1996) Mood disorders: rural/urban differences in prevalence, health care utilization, and disability in Ontario. J Affect Disord 38:57–65
Paykel ES, Abbott R, Jenkins R, Brugha TS, Meltzer H (2000) Urban–rural mental health differences in Great Britain: findings from the National Morbidity Survey. Psychol Med 30:269–280
Prudo R, Brown GW, Harris T, Dowland J (1981) Psychiatric disorders in a rural and an urban population: 2. Sensitivity to loss. Psychol Med 11:601–616
Acknowledgements
The Parisian area study was funded by the City of Paris (DASES), the French Ministries of Health, Environment and Defense and the Avenir Foundation. The Basse-Normandie study was made possible through funding by the Regional Councils of Basse-Normandie, Calvados, Manche and Orne, Lilly France Health Economics Department and AXA Insurance Normandie-Maine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kovess-Masfety, V., Lecoutour, X. & Delavelle, S. Mood disorders and urban/rural settings. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 40, 613–618 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0934-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0934-x