Summary
In primary care it is difficult to treat the growing number of non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients according to (inter)national guidelines. A prospective, controlled cohort study was designed to assess the intermediate term (2 years) effect of structured NIDDM care in general practice with and without ‘diabetes service’ support on glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, general well-being and treatment satisfaction. The ‘diabetes service’, supervised by a diabetologist, included a patient registration system, consultation facilities of a dietitian and diabetes nurse educator, and protocolized blood glucose lowering therapy advice which included home blood glucose monitoring and insulin therapy. In the study group (SG; 22 general practices), 350 known NIDDM patients over 40 years of age (206 women; mean age 65.3 ± SD 11.9; diabetes duration 5.9 ± 5.4 years) were followed for 2 years. The control group (CG; 6 general practices) consisted of 68 patients (28 women; age 64.6 ± 10.3; diabetes duration 6.3 ± 6.4 years). Mean HbAlc (reference 4.3-6.1 %) fell from 7.4 to 7.0 % in SG and rose from 7.4 to 7.6 % in CG during follow-up (p = 0.004). The percentage of patients with poor control (HbA1c>8.5%) shifted from 21.4 to 11.7% in SG, but from 23.5 to 27.9 % in CG (p = 0.008). Good control (HbAlc > 7.0 %) was achieved in 54.3 % (SG; at entry 43.4%) and 44.1% (CG; at entry 54.4%) (p = 0.013). Insulin therapy was started in 29.7% (SG) and 8.8 % (CG) of the patients (p = 0.000) with low risk of severe hypoglycaemia (0.019/patient year). Mean levels of total and HDL-cholesterol (SG), triglycerides (SG) and diastolic blood pressure (SG + CG) and the percentage of smokers (SG) declined significantly, but the prevalence of these risk factors remained high. General well-being (SG) did not change during intensified therapy. Treatment satisfaction (SG) tended to improve. Implementation of structured care, including education and therapeutic advice, results in sustained good glycaemic control in the majority of NIDDM patients in primary care, with low risk of hypoglycaemia. Lowering cardiovascular risk requires more than reporting results and referral to guidelines. [Diabetologia (1997) 40: 1334-13401
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GP:
-
General practitioner
- NIDDM:
-
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
- HBGM:
-
home blood glucose monitor
References
World Health Organization (Europe) and International Diabetes Federation (Europe) (1990) Diabetes care and research in Europe: The St. Vincent declaration. Diabet Med 7:360
Alberti KGMM, Gries FA (1988) Management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes in Europe: a consensus view. Diabet Med 5: 275–281
Alberti KGMM, Gries FA, Jervell J. Krans HMJ for the European NIDDM Policy Group (1994) A desktop guide for the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). An Update. Diabet Med 11: 889–909
Cromme PVM, Mulder JD, Rutten GEHM, Zuidweg J. Thomas S (1993) NHG-standard diabetes mellitus type II. In: Rutten GEHM, Thomas S (eds) Guidelines for the general practitioner. [In Dutch: NHG-standaarden voor de huisarts.] Bunge, Utrecht, pp 132–140
Grol R (1990) National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract 40: 23–25
Chesover D, Tudor-Miles P, Hilton S (1991) Survey and audit of diabetes care in general practice in south London. Br J Gen Pract 41: 282–285
Jacques CHM, Jones RL, Houts P et al. (1991) Reported practice behaviors for medical care of patients with diabetes mellitus by primary-care physicians in Pennsylvania. Diabetes Care 14: 712–717
Higgs ER, Kelleher A, Simpson HCR, Reckless JPD (1992) Screening programme for microvascular complications and hypertension in a community diabetic population. Diabet Med 9: 550–556
Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C, Coupland C, Williams I, Allison S, Sterland J (1993) Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice or delivery of care. BMJ 306: 630–634
Benett IJ, Lambert C, Hinds G, Kirton C (1994) Emerging standards for diabetes care from a city-wide primary care audit. Diabet Med 11: 489–492
Querido JD, Von Veh V (1995) Caring for type-2 diabetics in three inner city practices. Assessment of a protocol. Huisarts Wet 38(6):246–249
Whitford D, Avery A (1989) Barriers to comprehensive diabetes care in the northern region. Practical Diabetes 6: 114–116
Jones JN, Marsden P (1992) Improved diabetes care in a UK health district. Diabet Med 9: 176–180
Roland G, Hiss MD (1996) Barriers to care in non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus. The Michigan experience. Ann Intern Med 124: 146–148
Assal JP, Mühlhauser I, Pernet A, Gfeller R, Jörgens V, Berger M (1985) Patient education as the basis for diabetes care in clinical practice and research. Diabetologia 28: 602–613
Singh BM, Holland MR, Thorn PA (1984) Metabolic control of diabetes in general practice clinics: comparison with a hospital clinic. BMJ 289: 726–728
Koperski M (1992) How effective is systematic care of diabetic patients? A study in one general practice. Br J Gen Pract 42: 508–511
Thorell B, Olsson L, Svardsudd K (1994) Implementation of a structured care programme for diabetes mellitus in a defined population in mid-Sweden. Diabet Med 11: 458–464
Diabetes Integrated Care Team (1994) Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychological, and economic evaluation. BMJ 308:1208–1212
Jacobs ML, Akkerhuis KM, Dijk MJ van, Kuis FBM, Veldkamp RTM, Weber RFA (1995) Better diabetes control by strict observance of the standard ‘Diabetes mellitus type II’ of the Dutch College of General Practitioners. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 139: 1241–1245
Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (1995) Recommendations for the nutritional management of patients with diabetes mellitus. Diab Nutr Metab 8: 1–4
Sonnaville JJJ de, Feltz van der Sloot D van der, Ernst L, Wijkel D, Heine RJ (1996) Retinopathy screening in type II diabetes. Reliability of wide angle fundus photography. Diabet Med 13: 482–486
Sonnaville JJJ de, Wijkel D, Heine RJ (1997) The prevalence and determinants of foot ulcération in type II diabetic patients in a primary health care setting. Diab Res Clin Pract 35: 149–156
Yki-Järvinen H, Kauppila M, Kujansuu E et al. (1992) Comparison of insulin regimens in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 327: 1426–1433
Chow CC, Sorensen JP, Tsang LWW, Cockram CS (1995) Comparison of insulin with or without continuation of oral hypoglycaemic agents in the treatment of secondary failure in NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care 18: 307–314
Johnson JL, Wolf SL, Kabadi UM (1996) Efficacy of insulin and sulfonylurea combination therapy in type II diabetes. Arch Intern Med 156: 259–264
Abraira C, Colwell JA, Nuttall FQ et al. (VA CSDM Group) (1995) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in type II diabetes (VA CSDM). Diabetes Care 18: 1113–1123
Holman RR, Cull CA, Fox C, Turner RC, United Kingdom Prospective Study Group (1995) United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS) 13: relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years. BMJ 310: 83–88
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on development and progression of long term complications in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med 329: 977–986
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Sonnaville, J.J.J., Bouma, M., Colly, L.P. et al. Sustained good glycaemic control in NIDDM patients by implementation of structured care in general practice: 2-year follow-up study. Diabetologia 40, 1334–1340 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250050829
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250050829