Skip to main content
Log in

Unique Outcome Expectations as a Training and Pedagogical Tool

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The learning of the relations between discriminative stimuli, choice actions, and their outcomes can be characterized as conditional discriminative choice learning. Research shows that the technique of presenting unique outcomes for specific cued choices leads to faster and more accurate learning of such relations and has great potential to be developed into a training and pedagogical tool to help individuals with and without learning challenges better learn complex discrimination problems. We present a brief historical account of this technique, a theoretical and empirical analysis, and specific examples of the application of this training technique in everyday discrimination problems and in several traditional school subject areas. We conclude with the iteration that cognitive scientists and educational researchers need not overlook basic associative mechanisms that may be fundamental in subserving complex learning and memory processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BOSTOW, D. E., KRITCH, K. M., & TOMPKINS, B. F. (1995). Computers and pedagogy: Replacing telling with interactive computer-programmed instruction. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 27, 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRODIGAN, D. L., & PETERSON, G. B. (1976). Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLARKE, J. I. (1999). Time-in: When time-out doesn’t work. Seattle, WA: Parenting Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE CORTE, E. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning (mathematics) from instruction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 279–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DE ROSE, J. C., DE SOUZA, D. G., & HANNA, E. S. (1996). Teaching reading and spelling: Stimulus equivalence and generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 451–469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1995). Stimulus-reinforcer relations and emergent matching-to-sample. The Psychological Record, 45, 591–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESTEVEZ, A. F., FUENTES, L. J., MARI-BEFFA, P., GONZALEZ, C., & ALVAREZ, D. (2001). The differential outcome effect as a useful tool to improve conditional discrimination learning in children. Learning and Motivation, 32, 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESTEVEZ, A. F., FUENTES, L. J., OVERMIER, J. B., & GONZALEZ, C. (2003). Differential outcomes effect in children and adults with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108, 108–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ESTEVEZ, A. F., VIVAS, A. B., ALONSO, D., MARI-BEFFA, P., FUENTES, L. J., & OVERMIER, J. B. (2007). Enhancing challenged students’ recognition of mathematical relations through differential outcomes training. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 571–580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GOETERS, S., BLAKELY, E., & POLING, A. (1992). The differential outcomes effect. The Psychological Record, 42, 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOYOS, C. (2000). Equivalence class formation via common reinforcers among preschool children. The Psychological Record, 50, 629–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOCHHALTER, A. K., & JOSEPH, B. (2001). Differential outcomes training facilitates memory in people with Korsakoff and Prader-Willi syndromes. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 36, 196–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HOCHHALTER, A. K., SWEENEY, W. A., BAKKE, B. L., HOLUB, R. J., & OVERMIER, J. B. (2000). Improving face recognition in alcohol dementia. Clinical Gerontologist, 22, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, A. N. (1985). The role of discrimination and mediation in concept formation in art. Visual Arts Research, 11, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOSEPH, B., OVERMIER, J. B., & THOMPSON, T. (1997). Food- and nonfood- related differential outcomes in equivalence learning by adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 374–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KLAHR, D., CHEN, Z., & TOTH, E. E. (2001). Cognitive development and science education: Ships that pass in the night or beacons of mutual illumination? In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 75–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUSE, J. M., OVERMIER, J. B., KONZ, W. A., & ROKKE, E. (1983). Pavlovian Cs effects upon instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific. Learning & Motivation, 14, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LITT, M. D., & SCHREIBMAN, L. (1981). Stimulus-specific reinforcement in the acquisition of receptive labels by autistic children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LOPEZ-CRESPO, G., PLAZA, V., FUENTES, L. J., & ESTEVEZ, A. F. (2009). Improvement of age-related memory deficits by differential outcomes. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 503–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MACCORQUODALE, K., & MEEHL, P. E. (1953). Preliminary suggestions as to a formalization of expectancy theory. Psychological Review, 60, 55–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MAKI, P., OVERMIER, J. B., DELOS, S., & GUTMANN, A. J. (1995). Expectancies as factors influencing conditional discrimination performance of children. The Psychological Record, 45, 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • MALANGA, P., & POLING, A. (1992). Letter recognition by adults with mental retardation: Improving performance through differential outcomes. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 20, 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • MELCHIORI, L. E., DE SOUZA, D. G., & DE ROSE, J. C. (2000). Reading, equivalence, and recombination of units: A replication with students with different learning histories. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 97–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MARTINEZ, L., ESTEVEZ, A. F., FUENTES, L. J., & OVERMIER, J. B. (2009). Improving conditional discrimination learning in five-year-old children: Doe using different types of reinforcement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1617–1630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, O. T., WAUGH, K. M., & CHAMBERS, K. (2002). Differential outcomes effect: Increased accuracy in adults learning kanji with stimulus specific rewards. The Psychological Record, 52, 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MINSTER, S. T., JONES, M., ELLIFFE, D., & MUTHUKUMARASWAMY, S. D. (2006). Stimulus equivalence: Testing Sidman’s (2000) theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 371–391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MIYASHITA, Y., NAKAJIMA, S., & IMADA, H. (2000). Differential outcome effect in the horse. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 245–253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MOK, L. W., & OVERMIER, J. B. (2003, May). Differential rewards help me learn. Poster session presented at the American Psychological Society 15th Annual Convention, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOK, L. W., & OVERMIER, J. B. (2007). The differential outcomes effect in normal human adults using a concurrent-task within-subjects design and sensory outcomes. The Psychological Record, 57, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOK, L. W., THOMAS, K. M., LUNGU, O. V., & OVERMIER, J. B. (2009). Neural correlates of cue-unique outcome expectations under differential outcomes training: An fMri study. Brain Research, 1265, 111–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MOWRER, O. H. (1947). On the dual nature of learning: A reinterpretation of “conditioning” and “problem-solving.” Harvard Educational Review, 17, 102–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • NINNESS, C., RUMPH, R., MCCULLER, G., HARRISON, C., FORD, A. M., & NINNESS, S. K. (2005). A functional analytic approach to computer- interactive mathematics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • NINNESS, S., BARNES-HOLMES, D., RUMPH, R., MCCULLER, G., FORD, A. M., PAYNE, R., et al. (2006). Transformations of mathematical and stimulus functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 299–321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ORMROD, J. E. (2004). Human learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • OVERMIER, J. B., BULL, J. A., & TRAPOLD, M. A. (1971). Discriminative cue properties of different fears and their role in response selection in dogs. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 76, 478–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PETERSON, G. B., & TRAPOLD, M. A. (1980). Effects of altering outcome expectancies on pigeons’ delayed conditional discrimination performance. Learning and Motivation, 11, 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PETERSON, G. B., WHEELER, R. L., & ARMSTRONG, G. D. (1978). Expectancies as mediators in the differential-reward conditional discrimination performance of pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 6, 279–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R. A., & SOLOMON, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 13, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAVAGE, L. M. (2001). In search of the neurobiological underpinnings of the differential outcomes effect. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 36, 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHENK, J. L. (1994). Emergent relations of equivalence generated by outcome-specific consequences in conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record, 44, 537–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., KIRK, B., & WILSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., TAILBY, W., & CARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • STEELSMITH, S. (2000). Go to your room! Consequences that teach. Seattle, WA: Parenting Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • STROMER, R., MACKAY, H. A., HOWELL, S. R., MCVAY, A. A., & FLUSSER, D. (1996). Teaching computer-based spelling to individuals with developmental and hearing disabilities: Transfer of stimulus control to writing tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 25–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • THORNDIKE, E. L. (1914). Educational psychology: Briefer course. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOLMAN, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • TRAPOLD, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different? Learning and Motivation, 1, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRAPOLD, M. A., & OVERMIER, J. B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current theory and research (pp. 427–452). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J. (1990). Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimuli in pigeons’ delayed matching. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 302–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J. (2005). Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning. Learning and Behavior, 33, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leh Woon Mok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mok, L.W., Estevez, A.F. & Overmier, J.B. Unique Outcome Expectations as a Training and Pedagogical Tool. Psychol Rec 60, 227–247 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395705

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395705

Key words

Navigation