Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Strength-Based Perspectives in Psychoeducational Evaluations

  • General Article
  • Published:
The California School Psychologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emerging from the risk and resilience literature is the recognition that a focus on psychopathology and deficit-based assessment has its limitations. Developing an understanding of a youth’s developmental needs and the creation of a suitable intervention strategy also requires knowledge of her or his life contexts and personal assets. This holistic and optimistic perspective, which seeks to enhance positive development in youth, has been referred to as “strength-based” assessment. Until recently, children’s social/interpersonal strengths have not been systematically examined and there have been few standardized measures specifically designed to assess strengths. This article discusses the importance of a strength-based perspective when assessing students. Principles will be emphasized by demonstrating the utility of two strength-based instruments: the Behavioral Emotional Rating Scale (BERS) and the California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) in school psychology research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, E. J. (1987). Risk, vulnerability, and resilience: An overview. In E. J. Anthony & B. Cohler (Eds.), The invulnerable child (pp. 3–48). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benard, B. L. (1991). Fostering resilience in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, K. (1997). The anatomy of resilience. The Family Therapy Networker, 21, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2001). Standards of quality and effectiveness for Pupil Personnel Services Credentials: School Counseling, School Psychology, School Social Work, Child Welfare and Attendance. Sacramento, Ca: Author. [Online]. Available: www.ctc.ca.gov/profserv/programstandards/pps/pps.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, L. G., & Tadeschi, R. G. (1998). Beyond recovery from trauma: Implications for clinical practice and research. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, G. (1964). Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., & Garmezy, N. (1993). Prospects and promises in the study of resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. D. (1999). Strength-based practice: The ABC’s of working with adolescents who don’t want to work with you. [Online]. Available: www.drugs.indiana.edu/prevention/assets/asset2.html

  • Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 494–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, N., Benard, B., & Diaz, M. (1999). Measuring protective factors and resilience traits in youth: The Healthy Kids Resilience assessment. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, New Orleans, LA.

  • Cowan, P., Cowan, C. P., & Schultz, M. (1996). Thinking about risk and resilience in families. In E. M. Hetherington & E. Blechman (Eds.), Stress, coping and resilience in children and families (pp. 155–172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1995). Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, B., & Lyon, M. A. (1998). Risk and resilience: Implications for the delivery of educational and mental health services in schools. School Psychology Review, 27, 348–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeland, B., Carlson, E., & Stroufe, L. A. (1993). Resilience as a process. Development & Psychopathology, 5, 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H. (1999). The development and validation of a scale to assess the emotional and behavioral strengths of children and adolescents. Remedial & Special Education, 20, 258–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., Dakan, E., Oswald, D., & Yoe, J. T. (2001). Using strength based data to evaluate children’s mental health programs. Unpublished manuscript, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

  • Epstein, M. H., Harniss, M. K., Pearson, N., & Ryser, G. (1999). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 466–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, K. A., Leone, P. E., & Friedman, P. (1999). Strength-based assessment of children with SED: Consistency of reporting by teachers and parents. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 8, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1993). Boys play sports and girls turn into others: Age, gender and ethnicity as determinants of coping. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 253–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, M. J., Casas, J. M., Woodbridge, M., Sosna, T., Zanglis, I., Pavelski, R., & Turner, J. (2000). Santa Barbara County Multiagency Integrated System of Care evaluation summary. [Online]. Available: www.education.ucsb.edu/∼sbmisc/pdf%20files/MISC-Final-10-04-00.pdf

  • Garber, J. (1984). Classification of childhood psychopathology: A developmental perspective. Child Development, 55, 30–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N. (1993). Children in poverty: Resilience despite risk. Psychiatry, 56, 127–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (Eds.). (1983). Stress, coping, and development in children. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gest, S., Neeman, J., Hubbard, J. J., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (1993). Parenting quality, adversity, and conduct problems in adolescence: Testing process-oriented models of resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 663–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, M. D., & Sloboda, Z. (1999). Analysis and reconceptualization of resilience. In M. D. Glantz & J. L. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 109–126). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1999) The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40, 791–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, S., & Eckenrode, J. (1994). Context and process in research on risk and resilience. In R. Haggerty, L. Sherrod, N. Garmezy, & M. Rutter (Eds.), Stress, risk, and resilience in children and adolescents: Processes, mechanisms, and interventions (pp. 19–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, R. J., Sherrod, L., Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (Eds.). (1994). Stress, risk, and resilience in children and adolescents: Processes, mechanisms, and intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harniss, M. K., Epstein, M. H., Ryser, G., & Pearson, N. (1999). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Convergent validity. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, M. (1996). Constructive therapies Vol. 2. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. (1999). Toward an understanding of resilience: A critical review of definitions and models. In M. Glantz & J. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. S. (1998). Ecological assessment: A study of school psychology assessment practices in Massachusetts. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, AAM9815002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, P. M., & O’Brien, C. (1997). The situational response inventory: A measure of adaptive coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretzman, J. P., & McNight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M. (1964). The protection and promotion of mental health in schools. (Public Health Service Publication No. 1226. 4003342015). Washington DC: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Averill, J. R., & Opton, E. M. (1974). The psychology of coping: Issues of research and assessment. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 249–315). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S., & Cushing, G. (1999). Measurement issues in the empirical study of resilience: An overview. In M. Glantz & J. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 129–160). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. S., Uziel-Miller, N. D., Reyes, F., & Sokol, P.T. (2000). Strengths of children and adolescents in residential settings: Prevalence and associations with psychopathology and discharge placement. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G. B., & Validivieso, R. (2000). Measuring deficits and assets: How we track youth development now, and how we should track it. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development, Center for Youth Development and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddi, S. R. (1997). Personal Views Survey II: A measure of dispositional hardiness. In C. P. Zalaquett, & R. J. Wood (Eds.). Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 293–309). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., Best, K., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcame adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A., & Coatsworth, D. (1995). Competence, resilience, and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Volume 2: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 715–752). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., & Curtis, W. J. (2000). Integrating competence and psychopathology: Pathways toward a comprehensive science of adaptation in development. Development & Psychopathology, 12, 529–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., Hubbard, J. J., Gest, S. D., Tellegen, A., Garmezy, N., & Ramirez, M. (1999). Competence in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladaption from childhood to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 143–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E., Brehm, K., & Whitehouse, S. (1998). Reconceptualizing school-based prevention for antisocial behavior within a resilience framework. School Psychology Review, 27, 364–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1997). Life Stressors and Social Resources Inventory: A measure of adults’ and youths’ life contexts. In C. P. Zalaquett & R. J. Wood (Eds.). Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 177–190). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1993). Coping resources and processes: Current concepts and measures. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G., Furlong, M., & Morrison, R. (2000). Beyond resilience: Building relationship to promote thriving. Reaching Today’s Youth: The Community of Circle Caring Journal, 5, 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of School Psychologists. (2000). Standard for training and field placement programs in school psychology: Standard for the credentialing of school psychologists. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved April 9, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.naspweb.org/pdf/2000%20training%20&%20credentialing%20standards

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, S. M. (1991). Community involvement and disadvantaged students: A review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, S. M., Mucherah, W., & Jones, D. S. (2000). Understanding resilience: The role of social resources. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, S. M., & Pleck, J. H. (1994). Risk, resilience, and development: The multiple ecologies of Black adolescents in the United States. In R. J. Haggerty, N. Garmezy, M. Rutter, & L. Sherrod (Eds.), Stress, risk, and resilience in children and adolescents: Processes, mechanisms, and intervention (pp. 147–181). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, V. E. (1998). Strength in the face of adversity: Individual and social thriving. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, D. P., Cohen, R., Best, A. M., & Lyons, J. S. (2001). The role of child strengths in the determination of level of care for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Unpublished manuscript, Virginia Commonwealth University.

  • Parker, J. D., & Endler, N. S. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6, 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Mayne, T. J., & Francis, M. E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pobanz, M., & Furlong, M. J. (2000). Using protective factors to enhance the prediction of negative short-term outcomes of first-time juvenile offenders. Paper presented at the meeting of the Teacher Educators of Children and Behavior Disorders, Pheonix, AZ.

  • Quay, H. C. (1986). Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.), Psychopathological disorders of childhood (3rd ed., pp. 1–34). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C. A. (1997). Preface. In D. Saleeby (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, L. M., Harding, M. S., & Morrison, G. M. (1998). A comparison of risk and resilience indicators among Latino/a students: Differences between students identified as at-risk, learning disabled, speech impaired and not at-risk. Education & Treatment of Children, 21, 333–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In J. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. H. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 181–214). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., MacKinnon, D., Ayers, T. S., & Roosa, M. W. (1997). Developing linkages between theory and intervention in stress and coping processes. In S. A. Wolchik & I. N. Sandler (Eds.), Handbook of children’s coping: Linking theory and intervention (pp. 3–40). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Recipricol effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smokowski, P. R., Reynolds, A. J., & Bezruczko, N. (1999). Resilience and protective factors in adolescence: An autobiographical perspective from disadvantaged youth. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., Bishop, M., Collins, C. A., Kirk, S. B., & Sworowski, L. A. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 875–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., & Ellis, A. P. (1994). Coping through emotional approach: Problems of conceptualization and confounding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 350–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education. (1994). National agenda for achieving better results for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances. Washington DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & McConnell, S. R. (1995). The Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment-Adolescent Version. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C., & Gordon, E. W. (Eds.). (1994). Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieck, A., Rapp, C., Sullivan, W. P., & Kisthardt, S. (1989). A strengths perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34, 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, D. J. (1991). Hardiness and stress moderation: A test of proposed mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 89–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Furlong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhee, S., Furlong, M.J., Turner, J.A. et al. Integrating Strength-Based Perspectives in Psychoeducational Evaluations. Contemp School Psychol 6, 5–17 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340879

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340879

Navigation