Skip to main content
Log in

Provider turnover in public sector managed mental health care

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examines the extent of turnover in mental health provider networks within public sector managed mental health care over a 1-year period and its association to provider and practice characteristics. Telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of mental health services providers listed the previous year in the networks of the 3 public sector managed mental health care organizations operating in Puerto Rico. Thirty-one percent of respondents had dropped out of networks. The drop-out rate was significantly associated (P≤.05) with increasing number of years in practice and decreasing years under contract. A nonsignificant trend was observed, suggesting that providers with subspecialty training are less likely to drop out. The results may be signaling an emerging problem in public sector managed mental health care. Stability of provider networks should be monitored by state agencies contracting out mental health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Short AC, Mays GP, Lake TK. Provider network instability: implications for choice, costs, and continuity of care.Issues Brief. Findings from Center for Health System Change. June 2001;39:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gold MR, Hurley R, Lake T, et al. A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians.The New England Journal of Medicine. 1995;333:1679.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schauffler HH, McMenamin S, Cubanski J, et al. Differences in the kinds of problems consumers report in staff/group health maintenance organizations, independent practice association/network health maintenance organizations, and preferred provider organizations in California.Medical Care. 2001;39:15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meredith LS, Sturm R, Camp P, et al. Effects of cost-containment strategies within managed care on continuity of the relationship between patients with depression and their primary care providers.Medical Care. 2001;39:1075–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Starfield B, ed.Primary Care: Concepts, Evaluation, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchbinder SB, Wilson M, Melick CF, et al. Estimates of costs of primary care physician turnover.The American Journal of Managed Care. 1999;5:1431–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Essock SM, Goldman HH. State's embrace of managed care mental health.Health Affairs. 1995;14:34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Managed care tracking system. State sector managed behavioral healthcare and other reforms. Available at: http://samhsa.gov/mc/sstaterfls/contents.Html. Accessed January 12, 2002.

  9. Anderson DF, Berlant JL. Managed mental health and substance abuse services. In: Kongsvedt PR, ed.Essentials of Managed Care. Gaithesburg, Md: Aspen; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma CA, McGuire TG. Costs and incentives in a behavioral health carve-out.Health Affairs (Millwood). 1998;17:53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadley J, Mitchell JM. Effects of HMO market penetration on physician's work effort and satisfaction.Health Affairs. 1997;16:99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams TV, Zaslavsky AM, Cleary PD. Physicians experiences with and ratings of managed care organizations in massachusetts.Medical Care. 1999;37:589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stoddard JJ, Hargraves JL, Reed M, et al. Managed care, professional autonomy, and income. Effects on physician career satisfaction.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001;16:675–684.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeborn DK. Satisfaction, commitment, and psychological well-being among HMO physicians.The Western Journal of Medicine. January 2001;174:13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenstein RL. The job satisfaction and retention of physicians in organized setting: a literature review.Medical Care Research and Review. 1984;41:139–179.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lillie-Blanton L, Lyons B. Managed care an low-income populations: recent state experiences.Health Affairs. 1998;17:238–247.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brown JA, Nederend SE, Hays RD, et al. Special issues in assessing care of medicaid recipients.Medical Care. 1999;37:MS79-MS88.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schroeder SA. How can we tell whether there are too many or too few physicians? The case for benchmarking.JAMA. 1996;76:1841–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Managed care tracking system. State sector managed behavioral healthcare and other reforms. Available at: http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/publications/allpubs/SMA01-33537/chapter20.asp. Accessed January 12, 2002.

  20. Alegria M, McGuire T, Vera M, et al. Does managed mental health care reallocate resources to those with greater need for services?Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001;28(4):439–455.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Iglehart JK. Health policy report: managed care and mental health.The New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334:131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ginsburg PB. The dynamics of market level change.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. April 1997;22:363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma CA, McGuire TG. Network incentives in managed health care.Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2001;21:1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sturm R, Sherbourne CD. Managed care and unmet need for mental health and substance abuse care in 1998.Psychiatric Services. 2000;51:177.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller J. NCQA release annual report on state of managed care quality for 2001.Journal of Healthcare Quality. January–February 2002;24:37.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Merrick EM, Garnick DW, Horgan CM, et al. Use of performance standards in behavioral health carve-out contracts among fortune 500 firms.The American Journal of Managed Care. 1999;5:SP81-SP90.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenbaum S, Johnson K.Negotiating the New Health System: A Nationwide Study of Medicaid Managed Care Contracts. Washington, DC: George Washington University Medical Center, Center for Health Policy Research; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hogan MF. Managed public mental healthcare: issues, trends, and prospects.The American Journal of Managed Care. 1999;5:SP71-SP77.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Urban Institute.1998, Medicaid Managed Care Payment and Implementation Survey. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kessler RC, Zhao S, Katz SJ, et al. Past-year use of outpatient services for psychiatric problems in the National Comorbidity Survey.American Journal of Psychiatry. January 1999;156:115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Beinecke RH, Goodman M, Lockhart A. The impact of managed care on Massachusetts mental health and substance abuse provider.Administration in Social Work. 1996;21:41–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albizu-García, C.E., Ríos, R., Juarbe, D. et al. Provider turnover in public sector managed mental health care. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 31, 255–265 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287289

Keywords

Navigation