Skip to main content
Log in

Analog language teaching versus natural language teaching: Generalization and retention of language learning for adults with autism and mental retardation

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examined the effects of two instructional methods on language generalization and longterm retention in 23 adults with autism and severe to profound mental retardation. Analog language teaching employed discrete trials in a controlled setting concentrating on discrimination and identification of materials. Natural language teaching emphasized instruction through interactions that occurred incidentally to training students in the use of materials to perform functional tasks. Assessments were conducted under conditions favoring analog teaching to assure against partiality toward natural language teaching. Under such disadvantageous conditions, the methods of natural language teaching would be supported by results showing either no difference or an advantage in their favor. Both techniques increased initial and long-term generalization though the results suggest no relative superiority for either method under these assessment conditions. A significant interaction was found between prior functioning level and sequence of instruction. Because natural language teaching has many strengths, few drawbacks, and produces equal generalization and retention under disadvantageous conditions, it is strongly supported as preferable for people with autism and mental retardation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (1969).Bayley Scales of Infant Development: Birth to two years. New York: Psychological Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (1983). A module on functional curricula to prepare severely handicapped students for community environments: An overview of educational best practices. In L. M. Voeltz & R. Weatherman (Eds.),A series of professional training modules on the education of severely handicapped learners: An update of educational best practices (pp. 6–160). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1978, September). Learning the mother tongue.Human Nature, pp. 42–49.

  • Butterworth, J. R. (1989, December).A comparison of ratios of simulation to in vivo training in teaching grocery purchasing to students with severe handicaps. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, San Francisco.

  • Bzoch, K., & League, R. (1970).Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro, C. C., & Bambara, L. (1982). Two strategies for teaching language during free play.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrow, E., (1973).Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, K. N., & Dale, P. S. (1986). Direct language instruction and interactive language instruction with language delayed preschool children: A comparison study.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, J. M. (1983). Generalization across settings: Language intervention with children. In J. Miller, D. E. Yoder, & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.),Contemporary issues in language intervention (pp. 275–297). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolley, D., & Wheldall, K. (1988). Developing functional language with young children from English-speaking and Punjabi-speaking home backgrounds: Incidental teaching and contingent access to materials.Educational Psychology, 8, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, A. M., Mesaros, R. A., & Anderson, J. L. (1981).Teaching students with autism in natural environments: What educators need from researchers. Paper presented at International Symposium on Autism, National Society for Autistic Children, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, E. (1985). Teaching functional reading in context to severely retarded and severely retarded autistic adolescents of limited English proficiency.Adolescence, 20, 432–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egel, A. L. (1980). The effects of constant versus varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottesleben, R., Tyack, D., & Buschini, G. (1974). Three case studies in language training: Applied linguistics.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 39, 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullo, D. F., & Gullo, J. C. (1984). An ecological language intervention approach with mentally retarded adolescents.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 15, 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, J. W. (1984). Natural environment language assessment and intervention with severely impaired preschoolers.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 36–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. (1985). Naturalistic language training strategies. In S. F. Warren & A. Rogers-Warren (Eds.),Teaching functional language (pp. 63–85). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing the use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1974). Using preschool materials to modify the language of disadvantaged children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1980). In vivo language training: Unanticipated and general effects.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 407–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1982).How to use incidental teaching for elaborating language. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Rogers-Warren, A. (1978). A milieu approach to language teaching. In R. Schiefelbusch (Ed.),Language intervention strategies (pp. 193–235). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, R. P. (1989). Beyond cognition: A theory of autism. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 282–305). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1982). The language disordered child. In N. Lass, J. Northern, D. Yoder, & L. McReynolds (Eds.),Speech, language and hearing (Vol. 2, pp. 780–801). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., & Johnson, J. (1989). Motivating language use in autistic children. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 310–325). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., O'Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, K. E., Charlop, M. H., & Schreibman, L. (1988). Training parents to use the natural language paradigm to increase their autistic children's speech.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L. B. (1981). Facilitating linguistic skills in children with specific language impairment: A review.Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1977).The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, G. J. (1975). Ethological approach to delayed language acquisition.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J. D. (1985). Language through conversation. In S. F. Warren & A. K. Rogers-Warren (Eds.),Teaching functional language (pp. 89–122). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, L., & Schiefelbusch, R. L. (1984).Early language intervention. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclean, J. E., & Snyder-McLean, L. (1978).A transactional approach to early language training. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meline, T. J. (1980). The application of reinforcement in language intervention.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 11, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1983).The mother of Eve as a first language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A., & Tomlinson, C. (1977). Generalization of an operant remediation program for syntax with language-delayed children.Journal of Communication Disorders, 10, 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma, J. R. (1978).Language handbook: Concepts, assessments, and intervention. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1978). Public transportation training: In vivo versus classroom instruction.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. B., & Halle, J. W. (1982). Language training in the everyday environment: Teaching functional sign use to a retarded child.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlansky, M. D. (1979). “Sam's Day”: A simulated observation of a severely handicapped child's educational program.AAESPH Review, 4, 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prizant, B. M., & Wetherby, A. M. (1989). Enhancing language and communication in autism. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 282–309). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., & Keogh, W. J. (1985). Communication intervention: A selective review of what, when, and how to teach. In S. F. Warren & A. K. Rogers-Warren (Eds.),Teaching functional language. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. (1975). Setting generality and stimulus control in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 8, 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. G., Chapman, K., Terrell, B. Y., Prelock, P., & Rowan, L. (1985). Facilitating word combination in language-impaired children through discourse structure.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradlin, J., & Siegel, G. (1982). Language training in natural and clinical environments.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slosson, R. L. (1963).The Slosson Intelligence Test for children and adults. New York: Slosson Educational Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, B. B. (1983). The effect of context on language learning by severely retarded young adults.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 14, 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, T., & Baer, P. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., & Bambara, L. M. (1989). An experimental analysis of milieu language intervention: Teaching the action-object form.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 448–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., & Gazdag, G. (1990). Facilitating early language development with milieu intervention procedures.Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 62–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., & Kaiser, A. P. (1986a). Generalization of treatment effects by young language-delayed children: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., & Kaiser, A. P. (1986b). Incidental language teaching: A critical review.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., McQuarter, R. J., & Rogers-Warren, A. K. (1984). The effects of mands and models on the speech of unresponsive socially isolate children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., & Rogers-Warren, A. K. (1980). Current perspectives in language remediation.Education and Treatment of Children, 3, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehman, P., Abramson, M., & Norman, C. (1977). Transfer of training in behavior modification programs: An evaluative review.Journal of Special Education, 11, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehman, P., & Hill, J. (1980). Preparing severely and profoundly handicapped youth to enter less restrictive environments. In P. Wehman & J. Hill (Eds.),Instructional programming for severely handicapped youth: A community integration approach. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, C. (1979). Training approaches on syntactic skills of language-deviant children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B. (1980). Mastering prerequisite skills: The “readiness” logic. In B. Wilcox & A. Thompson (Eds.),Critical issues in educating autistic children and youth (pp. 28–31). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Division of Innovation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulz, S. V., Hall, M. K., & Klein, M. D. (1983). A home-centered instructional communication strategy for severely handicapped children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (1979).Preschool Language Scale. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors acknowledge the important assistance provided by the following people: the staff and management of the Behavior Development and Learning Center at CSH/DC directed by Israel Perel, Lisa Kramer, Steve Hafferkamp, James Lowdermilk, and, finally, and especially, to the participants themselves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliott, R.O., Hall, K. & Soper, H.V. Analog language teaching versus natural language teaching: Generalization and retention of language learning for adults with autism and mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord 21, 433–447 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02206869

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02206869

Keywords

Navigation