Abstract
Examined the effects of two instructional methods on language generalization and longterm retention in 23 adults with autism and severe to profound mental retardation. Analog language teaching employed discrete trials in a controlled setting concentrating on discrimination and identification of materials. Natural language teaching emphasized instruction through interactions that occurred incidentally to training students in the use of materials to perform functional tasks. Assessments were conducted under conditions favoring analog teaching to assure against partiality toward natural language teaching. Under such disadvantageous conditions, the methods of natural language teaching would be supported by results showing either no difference or an advantage in their favor. Both techniques increased initial and long-term generalization though the results suggest no relative superiority for either method under these assessment conditions. A significant interaction was found between prior functioning level and sequence of instruction. Because natural language teaching has many strengths, few drawbacks, and produces equal generalization and retention under disadvantageous conditions, it is strongly supported as preferable for people with autism and mental retardation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Bayley, N. (1969).Bayley Scales of Infant Development: Birth to two years. New York: Psychological Corp.
Brown, L. (1983). A module on functional curricula to prepare severely handicapped students for community environments: An overview of educational best practices. In L. M. Voeltz & R. Weatherman (Eds.),A series of professional training modules on the education of severely handicapped learners: An update of educational best practices (pp. 6–160). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Bruner, J. S. (1978, September). Learning the mother tongue.Human Nature, pp. 42–49.
Butterworth, J. R. (1989, December).A comparison of ratios of simulation to in vivo training in teaching grocery purchasing to students with severe handicaps. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, San Francisco.
Bzoch, K., & League, R. (1970).Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Cavallaro, C. C., & Bambara, L. (1982). Two strategies for teaching language during free play.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 80–93.
Carrow, E., (1973).Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources Corp.
Cole, K. N., & Dale, P. S. (1986). Direct language instruction and interactive language instruction with language delayed preschool children: A comparison study.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 206–217.
Costello, J. M. (1983). Generalization across settings: Language intervention with children. In J. Miller, D. E. Yoder, & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.),Contemporary issues in language intervention (pp. 275–297). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Dolley, D., & Wheldall, K. (1988). Developing functional language with young children from English-speaking and Punjabi-speaking home backgrounds: Incidental teaching and contingent access to materials.Educational Psychology, 8, 101–116.
Donnellan, A. M., Mesaros, R. A., & Anderson, J. L. (1981).Teaching students with autism in natural environments: What educators need from researchers. Paper presented at International Symposium on Autism, National Society for Autistic Children, Boston.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Duran, E. (1985). Teaching functional reading in context to severely retarded and severely retarded autistic adolescents of limited English proficiency.Adolescence, 20, 432–445.
Egel, A. L. (1980). The effects of constant versus varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 455–463.
Gottesleben, R., Tyack, D., & Buschini, G. (1974). Three case studies in language training: Applied linguistics.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 39, 213–224.
Gullo, D. F., & Gullo, J. C. (1984). An ecological language intervention approach with mentally retarded adolescents.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 15, 182–191.
Halle, J. W. (1984). Natural environment language assessment and intervention with severely impaired preschoolers.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 36–56.
Hart, B. (1985). Naturalistic language training strategies. In S. F. Warren & A. Rogers-Warren (Eds.),Teaching functional language (pp. 63–85). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing the use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 109–120.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1974). Using preschool materials to modify the language of disadvantaged children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 243–256.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1980). In vivo language training: Unanticipated and general effects.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 407–432.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1982).How to use incidental teaching for elaborating language. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.
Hart, B., & Rogers-Warren, A. (1978). A milieu approach to language teaching. In R. Schiefelbusch (Ed.),Language intervention strategies (pp. 193–235). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Hobson, R. P. (1989). Beyond cognition: A theory of autism. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 282–305). New York: Guilford.
Johnston, J. (1982). The language disordered child. In N. Lass, J. Northern, D. Yoder, & L. McReynolds (Eds.),Speech, language and hearing (Vol. 2, pp. 780–801). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Koegel, R. L., & Johnson, J. (1989). Motivating language use in autistic children. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 310–325). New York: Guilford.
Koegel, R. L., O'Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187–200.
Laski, K. E., Charlop, M. H., & Schreibman, L. (1988). Training parents to use the natural language paradigm to increase their autistic children's speech.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 391–400.
Leonard, L. B. (1981). Facilitating linguistic skills in children with specific language impairment: A review.Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 89–118.
Lovaas, O. I. (1977).The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York: Plenum Press.
Mahoney, G. J. (1975). Ethological approach to delayed language acquisition.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 139–148.
MacDonald, J. D. (1985). Language through conversation. In S. F. Warren & A. K. Rogers-Warren (Eds.),Teaching functional language (pp. 89–122). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
McCormick, L., & Schiefelbusch, R. L. (1984).Early language intervention. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17–31.
Mclean, J. E., & Snyder-McLean, L. (1978).A transactional approach to early language training. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Meline, T. J. (1980). The application of reinforcement in language intervention.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 11, 95–102.
Moerk, E. L. (1983).The mother of Eve as a first language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Mulac, A., & Tomlinson, C. (1977). Generalization of an operant remediation program for syntax with language-delayed children.Journal of Communication Disorders, 10, 231–244.
Muma, J. R. (1978).Language handbook: Concepts, assessments, and intervention. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1978). Public transportation training: In vivo versus classroom instruction.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 331–344.
Oliver, C. B., & Halle, J. W. (1982). Language training in the everyday environment: Teaching functional sign use to a retarded child.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 50–62.
Orlansky, M. D. (1979). “Sam's Day”: A simulated observation of a severely handicapped child's educational program.AAESPH Review, 4, 251–258.
Prizant, B. M., & Wetherby, A. M. (1989). Enhancing language and communication in autism. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 282–309). New York: Guilford.
Reichle, J., & Keogh, W. J. (1985). Communication intervention: A selective review of what, when, and how to teach. In S. F. Warren & A. K. Rogers-Warren (Eds.),Teaching functional language. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. (1975). Setting generality and stimulus control in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 8, 235–246.
Schwartz, R. G., Chapman, K., Terrell, B. Y., Prelock, P., & Rowan, L. (1985). Facilitating word combination in language-impaired children through discourse structure.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 31–39.
Spradlin, J., & Siegel, G. (1982). Language training in natural and clinical environments.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 2–6.
Slosson, R. L. (1963).The Slosson Intelligence Test for children and adults. New York: Slosson Educational Publications.
Spiegel, B. B. (1983). The effect of context on language learning by severely retarded young adults.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 14, 252–259.
Stokes, T., & Baer, P. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
Warren, S. F., & Bambara, L. M. (1989). An experimental analysis of milieu language intervention: Teaching the action-object form.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 448–461.
Warren, S. F., & Gazdag, G. (1990). Facilitating early language development with milieu intervention procedures.Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 62–86.
Warren, S. F., & Kaiser, A. P. (1986a). Generalization of treatment effects by young language-delayed children: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 239–251.
Warren, S. F., & Kaiser, A. P. (1986b). Incidental language teaching: A critical review.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 291–299.
Warren, S. F., McQuarter, R. J., & Rogers-Warren, A. K. (1984). The effects of mands and models on the speech of unresponsive socially isolate children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 42–52.
Warren, S. F., & Rogers-Warren, A. K. (1980). Current perspectives in language remediation.Education and Treatment of Children, 3, 133–153.
Wehman, P., Abramson, M., & Norman, C. (1977). Transfer of training in behavior modification programs: An evaluative review.Journal of Special Education, 11, 217–232.
Wehman, P., & Hill, J. (1980). Preparing severely and profoundly handicapped youth to enter less restrictive environments. In P. Wehman & J. Hill (Eds.),Instructional programming for severely handicapped youth: A community integration approach. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.
Weller, C. (1979). Training approaches on syntactic skills of language-deviant children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 46–55.
Wilcox, B. (1980). Mastering prerequisite skills: The “readiness” logic. In B. Wilcox & A. Thompson (Eds.),Critical issues in educating autistic children and youth (pp. 28–31). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Division of Innovation and Development.
Wulz, S. V., Hall, M. K., & Klein, M. D. (1983). A home-centered instructional communication strategy for severely handicapped children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 2–10.
Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (1979).Preschool Language Scale. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors acknowledge the important assistance provided by the following people: the staff and management of the Behavior Development and Learning Center at CSH/DC directed by Israel Perel, Lisa Kramer, Steve Hafferkamp, James Lowdermilk, and, finally, and especially, to the participants themselves.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, R.O., Hall, K. & Soper, H.V. Analog language teaching versus natural language teaching: Generalization and retention of language learning for adults with autism and mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord 21, 433–447 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02206869
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02206869