Abstract
The present article reviews studies which have examined the question of observer reactivity in adult-child interactions. Seventeen studies were located. Studies were classified according to the paradigm used to examine reactivity, the setting in which the study was conducted, the identification of the child as a behavior problem, and the occurrence and direction (i.e., increases or decreases in the observed behavior) of reactivity. The results indicated that the awareness paradigm has been employed most frequently, the laboratory has been the primary setting utilized, and problem and nonproblem children have been employed with approximately equal frequency. Reactivity was reported in about three-fourths of the studies. For adults positive and neutral verbal and physical behaviors were more reactive than negative behaviors. The positive and neutral behaviors typically increased in the observer's presence. For children conclusions are not warranted at this time as too few studies have examined children's behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernal, M. E., Gibson, D. M., Williams, D. E., & Pesses, D. I. A device for automatic audio tape recording.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971,4, 151–156.
Dubey, D. R., Kent, R. N., O'Leary, S. G., Broderick, J. E., & O'Leary, K. D. Reactions of children and teachers to classroom observers: A series of controlled investigations.Behavior Therapy, 1977,8, 887–897.
Gordon, D. A., Kleemeier, C. P., & Lee, C. Effects of observer presence on mother-child interaction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, Ga., 1975.
Green, K. D., Forehand, R., & McMahon, R. J. Parental manipulation of compliance and noncompliance in normal and deviant children.Behavior Modification, 1979,3, 245–266.
Hursh, H. B., Baer, D. M., & Rowbury, T. A pilot project to examine whether teachers “turn on” only when observers are present. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, La., 1974.
Jason, L. A. Observer reactivity in an educational setting. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta, Ga., 1977.
Johnson, S. M., & Bolstad, O. D. Methodological issues in naturalistic observation: Some problems and solutions for field research. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. C. Handy, & E. J. Mash (Eds.),Behavior Change: Methodology, Concepts, and Practice. Champaign, Ill.: Research Press, 1973.
Johnson, S. M., & Bolstad, O. D. Reactivity to home observation: A comparison of audio recorded behavior with observers present or absent.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975,8, 181–185.
Johnson, S. M., & Lobitz, G. K. Parental manipulation of child behavior in home observations.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974,7, 23–31.
Johnson, S. M., Christensen, A., & Bellamy, G. T. Evaluation of family intervention through unobtrusive audio recordings: Experiences in “bugging” children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976,9, 213–219.
Kanfer, R., Zegiob, L., & Forehand R. Habituation in parent-child interactions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia, 1978.
Kent, R. N., & Foster, S. L. Direct observational procedures: Methodological issues in naturalistic settings. In A. Ciminero, K. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of Behavioral Assessment. New York: Wiley, 1977.
Lipinski, D., & Nelson, R. Problems in the use of naturalistic observation as a means of behavioral assessment.Behavior Therapy, 1974,5, 341–351.
Lobitz, W. C., & Johnson, S. M. Parental manipulation of the behavior of normal and deviant children.Child Development, 1975,46, 719–726.
Mash, E. J., & Hedley, J. Effect of observer as a function of prior history of social interaction.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975,46, 659–669.
Nelson, R. O., Kapust, J. A., & Dorsey, B. L. Minimal reactivity of overt classroom observations on student and teacher behaviors.Behavior Therapy, 1978,9, 695–702.
Sattler, H. E., & Swoope, K. F. Teacher as token dispenser: Effect of an observer.Psychology in the Schools, 1976,13, 97–100.
Surratt, P. R., Ulrich, R. E., & Hawkins, R. P. An elementary student as a behavioral engineer.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969,2, 85–92.
Weinrott, M. R., & Jones, R. R. Differential effects of demand characteristics on teacher and pupil behavior.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977,69, 724–729.
Weinrott, M. R., Garrett, B., & Todd, N. The influence of observer presence on classroom behavior.Behavior Therapy, 1978,9, 900–911.
White, G. D. The effects of observer presence on the activity level of families.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977,10, 734. Full text of the manuscript available from NAPS Document No. 03025, ASIS/NAPS Co., % Microfiche Publications, 305 East 46th Street, New York, New York 10017.
Zegiob, L. E., & Forehand, R. Parent-child interactions: Observer effects and social class differences.Behavior Therapy, 1978,9, 118–123.
Zegiob, L. E., Arnold, S., & Forehand, R. An examination of observer effects in parent-child interactions.Child Development, 1975,46, 507–512.
Zegiob, L. E., Forehand, R., & Resick, P. A. Parent-child interactions: Habituation and resensitization effects.Journal of Child Clinical Psychology, 1979,7, 69–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported in part by NIMH Grant MH28859-01.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baum, C.G., Forehand, R. & Zegiob, L.E. A review of observer reactivity in adult-child interactions. Journal of Behavioral Assessment 1, 167–178 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322022
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322022