Skip to main content
Log in

The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structure of coping was examined in three studies by means of Wherry's approach to hierarchical factor analysis. A hierarchical model with three levels was identified that included eight primary factors, four secondary factors, and two tertiary factors. The eight primary factors (problem solving, cognitive restructuring, emotional expression, social support, problem avoidance, wishful thinking, self-criticism, and social withdrawal) identified dimensions of coping found in previous empirical research and theoretical writing. The emergence of the four secondary and two tertiary factors provided empirical support for two theoretical hypotheses concerning the structure of coping. Support for the constructs of problem- and emotion-focused coping hypothesized by Lazarus was obtained at the secondary level, and support for the constructs of approach and avoidance coping hypothesized by many theorists was obtained at the tertiary level. These findings suggest that both formulations may describe the structure of coping, albeit at different levels of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldwin, C. M., Folkman, S., Schaefer, C., Coyne, J., & Lazarus, R. (1980).Ways of coping: A process measure. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.

  • Aldwin, C. M., & Revenson, T. A. (1987). does coping help? A reexamination of the relation of coping and mental health.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 337–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckam, E., & Adams, R. (1984). Coping behavior in depression: A new scale.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 22 71–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 3 245–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiriboga, D., Jenkins, G., & Bailey, J. (1983). Stress and coping among hospice nurses: A test of an analytic model.Nursing Research, 32 294–299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56 754–761.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ergood, J., Frank, E., Holroyd, K., & Pilkonis, P. (1986).The relationship between anger, coping, and post-rape adjustment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Houston.

  • Ergood, J., Holroyd, K., Frank, E., Pilkonis, P., & Anderson, B. (1984).Coping with the aftermath of rape. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Philadelphia.

  • Felton, B. J., Revenson, T. A., & Hirichsen, G. A. (1984). Stress and coping in the explanation of psychological adjustment among chronically ill adults.Social Science and Medicine, 18 889–898.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle aged community sample.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21 219–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). It it changes it must be process: A stude of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 150–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 466–475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outsomes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 992–1003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 571–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1957). Instincts and their vicissitudes. In J. Strachey (Ed.),Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (pp. 111–142). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1915)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. (1983).Facor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Elrbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, J., Holroyd, K. A., Hursey, K. G., & Penzien, D. B. (1986). The role of stress in recurrent tension headache.Headache, 26 160–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd, K. A., Tobin, D. L., Rogers, L., Hursey, K. G., Penzien, D. B., & Holm, J. E. (1983).Psychological coping strategies and recurrent tension headache. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Baltimore.

  • Hovanitz, C. A. (1986). Life event stress and coping style as contributers to psychopathology.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42 34–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, K. I., & Gordon, R. A. (1963). Empirical note on the “number of factors” problem in factor analysis.Psychological Reports, 12 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C. L. (1982). Some reflections on general performance dimensions on halo rating error.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselman, G. A., Hagen, E. L., & Wherry, R. J. (1974). A factor analytic test of the Porter-Lawler expectancy model of work motivation.Personnel Psychology, 27 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Price, R. H., & Wortman, C. B. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping process.Annual Review of Psychology, 36 531–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobasa, S. C. (1982). Commitment and coping in stress resistance among lawyers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 168–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobasa, S. C., Maddi, S. R., & Kahn, S. (1982). Hardiness and health: A prospective study.Personality and Social Psychology, 42 168–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, s. (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littman, G., Stapelton, J., Oppenheim, A., & Peleg, M. (1983). An instrument for measuring coping behaviors in hospitalized alcoholics: Implications for relapse prevention treatment.British Journal of Addiction, 78 269–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maddi, S. R. (1980).Personality as a resource in stress resistance. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.

  • Maddi, S. R. (1986).The great stress-illness controversy. Presidential address to Division 1 (General Psychology) at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

  • Malloy, K. A., Appel, M. A., & Pukish, M. M. (1988).Psychological and demographic variables that differentiate women who return to abusive relationships and those who do not. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Women in Psychology, Bethesda, MD.

  • Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.),Personality and behavior disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 431–465). New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. (1975). Confirmatory factor analysis. In D. J. Amick & H. J. Walberg (Eds.),Introductory multivariate analysis (pp. 170–207). Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., & Suls, J. (1982). The effectiveness of attention and rejection as coping styles: A meta-analysis of temporal differences.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 26 43–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. M., Theofanous, A. G., Pingel, J. D., Holroyd, K. A., Leard, L., Tobin, D. L., Holm, J. E., Penzien, D. B., & Hursey, K. G. (1988).Are chronic headache disorders associated with high levels of stress or ineffective coping. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Boston.

  • Parkes, K. R. (1984). Locus of control, cognitive appraisal, and coping in stressful episodes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 655–668.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, K. R. (1986). Coping in stressful episodes: The role of individual differences, environmental factors, and situational characteristics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 1277–1292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C. K., & Hulin, C. L. (1982). An empirical comparison of item response theory and hierarchical factor analysis in applications to the measurement of job satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 826–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quayhagen, M. P., & Quayhagen, M. (1982). Coping with conflict: Measurement of age-related patterns.Research on Aging, 4 364–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, D. E., & Wherry, R. J. (1970). Performance dimensions of multi-line insurance agents.Personnel Psychology, 23 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J., (1986). Appraisal, avoidance, and coping with stress.American Psychologist, 7 813–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M., Weintraub, J., & Carver, C. (1986). Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 1257–1264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions.Psychometrika, 22 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A., & Neale, J. (1984). New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 892–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1985). The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis.Health Psychology, 4 249–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983).Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. H. (1951).The factorial analysis of human ability (5th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D., Holroyd, K., & Reynolds, R. (1982).The assessment of coping: The psychometric development of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advacement of Behavior Therapy, Los Angeles.

  • Tobin, D. L., Reynolds, R., Garske, J. P., Holroyd, K. A., & Wigal, J. (1984).Collecting test-retest reliability data on a measure of coping process: The problem of situational effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, New Orleans.

  • Tucker, L. R. (1951).A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report, No. 984). Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaliano, P. P., Russo, J., Carr, J. E., Maiuro, R. D., & Becker, J. (1985). The ways of Coping Checklist: Revision and psychometric properties.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbrown, F. H., Blaha, J., & Wherry, R. J. (1973). The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbrown, F. H., Blaha, J., Wherry, R. J., & Counts, D. H. (1974). An empirical test of Myklebust's cognitive structure hypothesis for 70 reading disabled children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 211–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wherry, R. (1959). Hierarchical factor solutions without rotation.Psychometrika, 24 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry, R. J., Jr. (1984).Contributions to correlational analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry, R. J., & Waters, L. K. (1968). Motivational constructs: A factorial analysis of feelings.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28 1035–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, S. (1980). Assessing coping behavior.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50 139–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The scale and a test manual are available upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tobin, D.L., Holroyd, K.A., Reynolds, R.V. et al. The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. Cogn Ther Res 13, 343–361 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173478

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173478

Key words

Navigation