Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental methods for studying “elementary motor mimicry”

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For over two hundred years, social psychologists have been puzzled by elementary motor mimicry—overt behavior by an observer that is appropriate to the situation of the other rather than to the observer's situation. This ubiquitous but fleeting behavior has not previously been amenable to experimental study, which might elucidate its meaning or meanings. The present article describes techniques for eliciting and videotaping such reactions in the lab. A wide variety of stimuli can be used to evoke smiling, wincing, leaning, and other motor mimicries. Recording is best done in split-screen, so that the relation between the behaviors of observer and observed can be analyzed. Several reliable scoring options are described (qualitative, quantitative, microanalysis, and self-report). Experimental controls can be introduced to rule out artifacts that might appear to be motor mimicry. These methods are introduced in the hope that the many different theories that have been offered to explain this phenomenon might finally begin to be tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W.Personality. A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W.Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.,) 1968, (Vol. 1, pp. 1–80). Reading, Mass: Adison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M.The psychology of interpersonal behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Pelican, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M.Mental development in the child and in the race. New York: Macmillan, 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M.Social and ethical interpretations in mental development. New York: Macmillan, 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, G. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981,40, 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. Evidence for microsynchrony of nonverbal behaviour to a video stimulus. Unpublished manuscript, University of Victoria, 1986a.

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. Form and function in motor mimicry. Unpublished manuscript, University of Victoria, 1986b.

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. “Ishow how you feel.” Motor mimicry as a communicative act.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,50, 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. Motor Mimicry as as primitive empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.),Empathy: A developmental perspective. New York: Academic Press, in press.

  • Bender, I. E., & Hastorf, A. H. On measuring generalized empathic ability (social sensitivity).Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953,48, 503–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. M. Conditioning through vicarious instigation.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 450–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. M., & Hadley, S. W. Some effects of a model's performance on an observer's electromyographic activity.American Journal of Psychology, 1975,88, 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. M., Irwin, D. S., & Frommer, G. P. Electromyographic activity during observational learning.American Journal of Psychology, 1970,83, 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, K. D., & Weinstein, M. S. Conditioning vicarious affective arousal.Psychological Reports, 1965,17, 955–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (originally published 1872), 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983,44, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaghy, W. C.Data collection and analysis approaches in nonverbal behavior research. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.),Nonverbal Behavior, Lewiston, New York: C.J. Hogrefe, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, R. F. A scale for the measurement of empathic ability.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 1949, 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. S. The measurement of static ataxia.American Journal of Psychology, 1942,55, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. S. Factors tending to decrease the steadiness of the body at rest.American Journal of Psychology, 1943,56, 599–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, N. D. Empathy in children: Some theoretical considerations.The Counseling Psychologist, 5, 1975, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, R., & Tepper, D. T. Nonverbal components of empathic communication.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1972,5, 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation.Developmental Psychology, 1975,11, 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, E. B.Animal drive and the learning process. New York: Holt, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L.Hypnosis and suggestibility. New York: Appleton-Century, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. A., & Speroff, B. J.The measurement of empathy. Chicago: Psychometric Affiliates, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W.The mentality of apes (2nd ed.) [translated from the 2nd revised edition by Ella Winter] New York: Harcourt, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. Empathy and altruism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,32, 1134–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupferer, H. J. K. Couvade: Ritual or real illness.American Antrhropologist, 1965,67, 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B., & Berger, S. M. Crowd noise and mimicry.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 1983, 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. B., & Clark, R. O. Distress crying in neonates: Species and peer specificity.Developmental Psychology, 1982,18, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W.Introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H.Mind, self, and society. (C. M. Morris, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R., & Steinberg, M.Between people. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J.Social learning and imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, R., & Dubin, R. Baby feeding and body sway: An experiment in George Herbert Mead's “taking the role of the other.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,10, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, T.The psychology of the emotions. London: W. Scott, 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. Empathic: An unappreciated way of being.The Counseling Psychologist, 1975,5, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M.The nature of sympathy (2nd ed., transl H. Heath). New Haven: Yale University Press, 1923/1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Miller, 1759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H.The principles of psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1). London: Williams and Norgate, 1870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotland, E. Exploratory investigations of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, O., Jr. Empathy: A review of theory and research.Psychological Newsletter, 1957,9, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemann, J. M. Explication and test of a model of communicative competence.Human Communication Research, 1977,3, 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are with the Department of Psychology at the University of Victoria.

Order of authors is alphabetical. Scott MacInnis is now with the Ministry of Post-Secondary Education, Province of British Columbia. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the University of Victoria, have provided financial support since the earliest phases of this project. David Rosenhan and Carol Sigelman made valuable comments on the manuscript. The experimenters in the studies on which this article is based included Geoffry Smith, Susan Cathro, and Brad Dishan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Lemery, C.R. et al. Experimental methods for studying “elementary motor mimicry”. J Nonverbal Behav 10, 102–119 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000007

Keywords

Navigation