Abstract
The effect of task demands on the detection of semantic illusions was investigated. In Exp. 1, subjects were given a detection task with different instructions for accuracy. Less illusions occurred under instructions that stressed accuracy, indicating strategic control of detection rates. In Exp. 2, sentences with dissimilar distorted terms resulted in shorter latencies than sentences with similar distorted terms in a detection task, but in longer response times in a question-answering task. In Exp. 3, the similarity effect was found to vary with the position of the distorted term in combination with task demands. In a verification task, the similarity effect did not differ for the beginning or the end of sentences. In a question-answering task, a significant similarity effect was observed only for distorted terms at the beginning of sentences. We argue that the results indicate minimal depth of semantic processing with respect to different task requirements. Implications for different theoretical accounts of semantic illusions are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnan, & T. G., Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance. Vol. 1. Theoretical perspectives. (pp. 155–205). New York: Academic Press.
Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477–487.
Bredart, S., & Modolo, K. (1988). Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 67, 135–144.
Epstein, W., Glenberg, A. M., & Bradley, M. M. (1984). Coactivation and comprehension: Contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing. Memory and Cognition, 12, 355–360.
Erickson, T. D. & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540–551.
Foertsch, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1994). In search of complete comprehension: Getting “Minimalists”, to work. Discourse Processes, 18, 271–296.
Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702–718.
Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597–602.
Graesser, A. C., McMahen, C. L., & Johnson, B. K. (1994). Question asking and answering. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 517–538). Academic Press, New York.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.
Oostendorp, H. van, & Kok, I. (1990). Failing to notice errors in sentences. Language and Cognitive processes, 5, 105–113.
Oostendorp, H. van, & Mul, S. de. (1990). Moses beats Adam: A semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 74, 35–46.
Reder, L.M., & Cleeremans, A. (1990). The role of partial matches in comprehension: The Moses illusion revisited. In A.C. Graesser & G.H. Bower (Eds.) The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol 25. Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 233–258). London: Academic Press.
Reder, L. M., & Kusbit, G. W. (1991). Locus of the Moses illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 385–406.
Robertson, S. P., Ullman, J., & Mehta, A. (1992). Simultaneous question comprehension and answer retrieval. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robertson, S. P., Weber, K., Ullman, J., & Mehta, A. (1993). Parallel question parsing and memory retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 155–168.
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1994). Selective processing in text understanding. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 699–719). New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, S. G., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P., Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some Qualifications. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 141–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Jaarsveld, H.J., Dijkstra, T. & Hermans, D. The detection of semantic illusions: Task-specific effects for similarity and position of distorted terms. Psychol. Res 59, 219–230 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439299
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439299