Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Can Adolescents Learn Self-control? Delay of Gratification in the Development of Control over Risk Taking

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent findings from developmental neuroscience suggest that the adolescent brain is too immature to exert control over impulsive drives, such as sensation seeking, that increase during adolescence. Using a discounting of delayed reward paradigm, this research examines the ability to delay gratification as a potential source of control over risk-taking tendencies that increase during adolescence. In addition, it explores the role of experience resulting from risk taking as well as future time perspective as contributors to the development of this ability. In a nationally representative sample (n = 900) of young people aged 14–22, a structural equation analysis shows that risk taking as assessed by use of three popular drugs (tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol) is inversely related to the ability to delay gratification. The relation is robust across gender, age, and different levels of sensation seeking. In addition, high sensation seekers exhibit dramatic age-related increase in delay of gratification, lending support to the hypothesis that engaging in risky behavior provides experience that leads to greater patience for long-term rewards. The findings support the conclusion that a complete understanding of the development of self-control must consider individual differences not easily explained by universal trends in brain maturation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bembenutty, H. F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (2004). EQS 6 structural equation manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., & Nichols, T. D. (2006). Preventing youth violence and delinquency through a universal school-based prevention approach. Prevention Science, 7, 403–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. N., Keough, K. A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. A., Potenza, M. N., & Taylor, J. R. (2003). Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1041–1052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donohew, L., Hoyle, R. H., Lorch, E. P., Palmgreen, P., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., & Rosenbaum, J. (2008). Self-regulation and the income-achievement gap. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 504–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, G. T., & Hall, P. A. (2003). Time perspective: A potentially important construct for decreasing health risk behaviors among adolescents. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 106–112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., Myerson, J., Lichtman, D., Rosen, S., & Fry, A. (2008). Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: The role of age and income. Psychology and Aging, 11, 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2003). Impulsive decision-making and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch, D., & Taylor, J. R. (1999). Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: Implications for the control of behavior by rewardrelated stimuli. Psychopharmacology, 146, 373–390.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2008). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2007: Vol. 1. Secondary school students (NIH Publication N. 08-64-18A). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joireman, J., Sprott, D. E., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2005). Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1159–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingberg, T., Fernell, E., Olesen, P., Johnson, M., Gustafsson, P., Dahlstrom, K., et al. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 177–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartt, A. T., Shabanova, V. I., & Leaf, W. A. (2003). Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 311–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Peake, P. K., & Shoda, Y. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 687–696.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, M. A., Grabowski, D. C., Dee, T. S., & Campbell, C. (2006). The strength of graduated drivers license programs and fatalities among teens and passengers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. A., Bloom, F. E., Cameron, J. L., Amaral, D., Dahl, R. E., & Pine, D. (2002). An integrative, multidisciplinary approach to the study of brain-behavior relations in the context of typical and atypical development. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 499–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, J. (1991). How do adolescents see the future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11, 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattij, T., & Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J. (2008). The neuropharmacology of impulsive behavior. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 29, 192–199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (2002). Stimulation seeking and intelligence: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 663–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B. (2004). Do high rates of cigarette consumption increase delay discounting? A cross-sectional comparison of adolescent smokers and young-adult smokers and nonsmokers. Behavioural Processes, 67, 545–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B. (2006). A review of delay-discounting research with humans: Relations to drug use and gambling. Behavioural Pharmacology, 17, 651–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., & Schiffbauer, R. (2005). Delay of gratification and delay discounting: A unifying feedback model of delay-related impulsive behavior. Psychological Record, 55, 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., Penfold, R. B., & Patak, M. (2008). Dimensions of impulsive behavior in adolescents: Laboratory behavioral assessments. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16, 124–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, N. R., Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., & Pentz, M. A. (2006). The meditational role of neurogcognition in the behavioral outcomes of a social-emotional prevention program in elementary school students: Effects of the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science, 7, 91–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberti, J. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D., & Hennessy, M. (2007). A biosocial-affect model of adolescent sensation seeking: The role of affect evaluation and peer-group influence in adolescent drug use. Prevention Science, 8, 89–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccamanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 14931–14936.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye, & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Schultz, W. (2002). Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron, 36, 241–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shamosh, N. A., DeYoung, C. G., Green, A. E., Reis, D. L., Johnson, M. R., Conway, A. R. A., et al. (2008). Individual differences in delay discounting: Relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 19, 904–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shedler, J., & Block, J. (1990). Adolescent drug use and psychological health: A longitudinal inquiry. American Psychologist, 45, 612–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. T., Fischer, S., Cyders, M. A., Annus, A. M., Spillane, N. S., & McCarthy, D. M. (2007). On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits. Assessment, 14, 155–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spanagel, R., & Weiss, F. (1999). The dopamine hypothesis of reward: Past and current status. Trends in Neuroscience, 22, 521–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, L. P. (2000). Neurobehavioral changes in adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, L. P. (2007). The developing brain and adolescent-typical behavior patterns: An evolutionary approach. In D. Romer & E. Walker (Eds.), Adolescent psychopathology and the developing brain: Integrating brain and prevention science (pp. 9–30). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80, 28–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies (2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (NSDUH Series H-34, DHHS Publication No. SMA 08-4343). Rockville, MD.

  • Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Estimates of the population of the United States, by age, sex, and race: 1990 to 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdejo-Garcia, A., Lawrence, A. J., & Clark, L. (2008). Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: Review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers, and genetic association studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 777–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. M., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Cooper, S. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th and 12th grand students, 1976–2000. Addiction, 98, 225–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2006). Are juvenile offenders extreme future discounters? Psychological Science, 17(11), 989–994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, L. T., Taylor, T. J., He, N., & Esbensen, F.-A. (2006). Self-control and variability over time: Multivariate results using a 5-year multisite panel of youths. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 253–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zald, D. H., Cowan, R. L., Riccardi, P., Baldwin, R. M., Ansari, M. S., Li, R., et al. (2008). Midbrain dopamine receptor availability is inversely associated with novelty-seeking traits in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 14372–14378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1994). Biobehavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Daniel Romer & Sharon Sznitman

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Angela L. Duckworth

  3. College of Nursing Science, Kyunghee University, Seoul, Korea

    Sunhee Park

Authors
  1. Daniel Romer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angela L. Duckworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sharon Sznitman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sunhee Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Romer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romer, D., Duckworth, A.L., Sznitman, S. et al. Can Adolescents Learn Self-control? Delay of Gratification in the Development of Control over Risk Taking. Prev Sci 11, 319–330 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0171-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0171-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation