Skip to main content

Effects of perceptual organization and musical form on melodic expectancies

  • III. From Rhythm to Expectation
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Music, Gestalt, and Computing (JIC 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1317))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The experiment reported in this chapter examines two aspects of music perception: the role of perceptual organization in generating melodic expectancies, and attentional processing directed at different levels of hierarchical structure in music. The implication-realization model (Narmour, 1990) provides a framework for approaching these questions. It holds that principles of perceptual organization define coherent units within which expectancies operate. The model describes melodic expectancies with five bottom-up principles. The principles are hypothesized to apply not only on the lowest, tone-to-tone level, but also on higher levels between noncontiguous tones. Musical form is described as units at multiple, hierarchically-organized levels. The model holds that when music has similar form, that is, when some characteristics of a pattern are repeated, it draws attention to higher levels. This has the effect of strengthening expectancies operating on higher levels. Thus, musical form is hypothesized to modify the relative strengths of the proposed principles on different levels. An experiment tests these predictions with melodic sequences that contain implications on two levels and exhibit either similar form, AA', or dissimilar form, AB. The sequences are followed by continuation tones that listeners judge as to whether they are good continuations. These judgments are tested against a numerical coding of the bottom-up principles of the model. The results support the model's principles at both the low and high levels, and confirm the predicted effects of form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartlett, J., & Dowling, W. (1980). The recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltz, M., & Jones, M. (1986). Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does? Cognitive Psychology, 18, 389–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltz, M., Marshburn, E., Jones, M., & Johnson, W. (1985). Serial-pattern structure and temporal-order recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, A. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, J. (1981). Some factors which influence melodic expectancy. Psychomusicology, 1, 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, J., Divenyi, P., & Taylor, J. (1970). A preliminary study of perceptual expectancy in melodic configurations. Council for Research in Music Education Bulletin, 22, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, L., & Badertscher, B. (1987). Recovery of the tonal hierarchy: Some comparisons across age and levels of musical experience. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 609–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, L., Cohen, A., & Miller, J. (1979). Melody recognition: The experimental application of rules. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 148–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, L., & Lunney, C. (1995). Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Perceptual judgments of melodic continuity. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1980). The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 381–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D., & Feroe, J. (1981). The internal representation of pitch sequences in tonal music. Psychological Review, 88, 503–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, W. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, W., & Bartlett, J. (1981). The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies. Psychomusicology, 1, 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. (1990). Tonal hierarchies and rare intervals in music cognition. Music Perception, 7, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. (1991). Melodic structure: Theoretical and empirical descriptions. In J. Sundberg, L. Nord, & R. Carlson (Eds.), Music, language, speech, and brain. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. (1995a). Effects of musical context on similarity and expectancy. Systematische Musikwissenschaft, 3, 211–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. (1995b). Music psychology and music theory: Problems and prospects. Music Theory Spectrum, 17, 53–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C., & Kessler, E. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. (1973). Explaining music. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, C., & Carterette, E. (1985). Pitch and durations as determinants of musical space. Music Perception, 8, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard-Gott, L. (1983). Emergence of thematic concepts in repeated listening to music. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 66–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, B., & Meyer, L. (1982). Melodic processes and the perception of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, B., & Meyer, L. (1986). The perceptual roles of melodic process, contour, and form. Music Perception, 4, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmuckler, M. (1989). Expectation in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic processes. Music Perception, 7, 109–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmuckler, M. (1990). The performance of global expectations. Psychomusicology, 9, 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., & Sumner, R. (1968). Pattern in music. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Formal representation of human judgement. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Cuddy, L. (1989). Effects of metric and harmonic rhythm on the detection of pitch alterations in melodic sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unyk, A., & Carlsen, J. (1987). The influence of expectancy on melodic perception. Psychomusicology, 7, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marc Leman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krumhansl, C. (1997). Effects of perceptual organization and musical form on melodic expectancies. In: Leman, M. (eds) Music, Gestalt, and Computing. JIC 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034122

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034122

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63526-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69591-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics