Abstract
The Stoplight Task, a procedure involving a computer analog of a stoplight, was evaluated for assessing risk taking in humans. Seventeen participants earned points later exchangeable for money by completing a response requirement before the red light appeared on a simulated traffic light. The green light signaled to start responding; it changed to yellow at different points into the response requirement. The yellow light, which varied unpredictably in duration, was eventually replaced with a red light. Participants could stop or continue responding when the yellow light appeared. Stopping protected earnings; completing the response requirement before the red light earned money; continuing but failing to complete the response requirement before the red light appeared could result in money loss with 12.5% or 100% probability. The probability of risk taking (running the yellow) was lower when the probability of monetary loss was 100% and when the yellow light appeared early in the completion of the response requirement. Participants scoring higher on risk-taking and impulsivity personality rating scales behaved ‘riskier’ in the stoplight task. Potential applications of the Stoplight Task are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARRATT, E. S. (1965). Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety. Psychological Reports, 16, 547–554.
BECHARA A., DAMASIO, H., TRANEL, D., & DAMASIO, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295.
BRADY, J. V., BRADFORD, D., & HEINZ, R. D. (1979). Behavioral assessment of risk-taking and psychophysical functions in the baboon. Neurobehavioral Toxicology, 1 (Suppl. 1), 73–84.
CARLTON, P. L., SIEGEL, J. L., MURPHREE, H. B., & COOK, L. (1981). Effects of diazepam on operant behavior in man. Psychopharmacology, 73, 314–317.
DESJARDINS, P. J., MOERSCHBAECHER, J. M., THOMPSON, D. M., & THOMAS, J. R. (1982). Intravenous diazepam in humans: Effects on acquisition and performance of response chains. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 17, 1055–1059.
EYSENCK, S. B. G., & EYSENCK, H. J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 57–68.
EYSENCK,, S. B. G., & EYSENCK, H. J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological Reports, 43, 1247–1255.
GASPER, K., & CLORE, G. L. (1998). The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1350–1363.
GELLER, I., & SEIFTER, J. (1960). The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia, 1, 482–492.
GREENWALD, M. K., JOHANSON, C. E., & SCHUSTER, C. R. (1999). A human laboratory model of risk-taking behaviour. Behavioural Pharmacology, 10(Suppl.), 41–42.
HINRICHS, J. V., MEWALDT, S. P., GHONEIM, M. M., & BERIE, J. L. (1982). Diazepam and learning: Assessment of acquisition deficits. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 17, 165–170.
KELLY, T. H., FOLTIN, R. W., KING, L., & FISCHMAN, M. W. (1992). Behavioral response to diazepam in a residential laboratory. Biological Psychiatry, 31, 808–822.
KIRBY, K. N., PETRY, N. M., & BICKEL, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78–87.
LANE, S. D., & CHEREK, D. R. (2000). Analysis of risk taking in adults with a history of high risk behavior. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 60, 179–187.
LANE, S. D., & CHEREK, D. R. (2001). Risk taking by adolescents with maladaptive behavior histories. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 74–82.
LEJUEZ, C. W., READ, J. P., KAHLER, C. W., RICHARDS, J. B., RAMSEY, S. E., STUART, G. L., STRONG, D. R., & BROWN, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84.
MADDEN, G. J., PETRY, N. M., BADGER, G. J., & BICKEL, W. K. (1997). Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: Drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5, 256–262.
MCMILLAN, D. E. (1975). Determinants of drug effects on punished responding. In B. Weiss & V. G. Laties (Eds.), Behavioral pharmacology: The current status (pp. 229–247). New York: Plenum.
MAZUR, J. E. (1989). Theories of probabilistic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 87–99.
MOBINI, S., BODY, S., HO, M.Y., BRADSHAW, C. M., SZABADI, E., DEAKIN, J. F., & ANDERSON, I. M. (2002). Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement. Psychopharmacology, 160, 290–298.
VUCHINICH, R. E., & SIMPSON, C. A. (1998). Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 292–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from NIH/NIDA DA10239 and DA00485. We thank Ed Bunker, who implemented the software code for the stoplight task, and Joseph Brady, whose work inspired this human experimental model.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reilly, M.P., Greenwald, M.K. & Johanson, CE. The Stoplight Task: A Procedure for Assessing Risk Taking in Humans. Psychol Rec 56, 191–203 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395544
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395544