Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to assess the cross-cultural generality of monetary decision-making processes, American, Chinese, and Japanese graduate students were studied on two tasks: In the delay discounting task, participants made choices between immediate and delayed hypothetical monetary rewards; in the probability discounting task, participants made choices between certain and probabilistic rewards. Some notable cross-cultural similarities were observed. Two-parameter hyperbola-like functions described both delay and probability discounting for all three groups. Moreover, for all three groups the rate at which delayed rewards were discounted was higher for the smaller amount whereas the rate at which probabilistic rewards were discounted was lower for the smaller amount. Some group differences were also observed. As measured by the area under the empirical discounting curve, the Americans and Chinese discounted delayed rewards more steeply than the Japanese. In addition, the Americans discounted probabilistic rewards the most, whereas the Chinese discounted probabilistic rewards the least. Despite these differences, the similarities in the form of the discounting functions and in the effects of amount suggest that there are fundamental commonalities among the three groups with respect to the processes underlying their evaluation of delayed and probabilistic rewards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • GELL, A. (1992). The anthropology of time: Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Berg: Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., FRY, A. E., & MYERSON, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., & MYERSON, J. (1993). Alternative frameworks for the analysis of self control. Behavior and Philosophy, 21, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., & MCFADDEN, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition, 25, 715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., & OSTASZEWSKI, P. (1999a). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 418–427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., & OSTASZEWSKI, P. (1999b). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behavioural Processes, 46, 89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HELFRICH, H. (Ed.). (1996). Time and mind. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEYMAN, G. M. (1996). Resolving the contradictions of addiction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOFSTEDE, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSEE, C. K., & WEBER, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KIRBY, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KIRBY, K. N., & MARAKOVIC, N. N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KIRBY, K. N., & MARAKOVIC, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LOEWENSTEIN, G., & ELSTER, J. (Eds.). (1992). Choice over time. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOEWENSTEIN, G., & PRELEC, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARKUS, H. R., & KITAYAMA, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MYERSON, J., & GREEN, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 263–276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MYERSON, J., GREEN, L., & WARUSAWITHARANA, M. (2001). Area-under-the-curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ORPEN, C. (1983). Risk-taking attitudes among Indian, United States, and Japanese managers. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 283–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSTASZEWSKI, P., GREEN, L., & MYERSON, J. (1998). Effects of inflation on the subjective value of delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 324–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRELEC, D., & LOEWENSTEIN, G. (1991). Decision making overtime and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37, 770–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H. (1990). Why do people gamble and keep gambling despite repeated losses? Psychological Science, 1, 294–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H. (1995). Self-control: Beyond commitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H., LOGUE, A.W., GIBBON, J., & FRANKEL, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice. Psychological Review, 93, 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H., RAINERI, A., & CROSS, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RAINERI, A., & RACHLIN, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RODRIGUEZ, M. L., & LOGUE, A. W. (1988). Adjusting delay to reinforcement: Comparing choice in pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 105–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SEGALL, M. H., LONNER, W. J., & BERRY, J. W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1952). A note on functional relations obtained from group data. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 263–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIMPSON, C. A., & VUCHINICH, R. E. (2000). Reliability of a measure of temporal discounting. The Psychological Record, 50, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • SINHA, T. (1996). Pecuniary aspect of risk taking: Are Singaporeans more risk averse than Americans? In W. H. LOKE (Ed.), Perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 139–143). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEVENS, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TAKANO, Y., & OSAKA, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the U. S. on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TAN, C. T, & JOHNSON, R. D. (1996). To wait or not to wait: The influence of culture on discounting behavior. In W. H. LOKE (Ed.), Perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 97–106). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEBER, E. U., & HSEE, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes toward perceived risk. Management Science, 44, 1205–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEBER, E. U., & HSEE, C. K. (2000). Culture and individual judgment and decision making. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 32–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard Green.

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant Mh55308 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, W., Green, L. & Myerson, J. Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards. Psychol Rec 52, 479–492 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395199

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395199

Navigation