Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Preferences of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: A Survey of Current Practices

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although professionals working with individuals with developmental disabilities have much to gain from using systematic methods of reinforcer identification, practitioner knowledge and use of stimulus preference assessments (SPA) has rarely been examined. The purpose of this survey was to assess awareness and implementation of SPAs among professionals who serve people with developmental disabilities within and outside the field of applied behavior analysis. A total of 406 individuals responded to the survey; 246 respondents were recruited via direct email, and 160 respondents were recruited from Internet postings. Fewer than 60% of respondents across all disciplines (i.e., applied behavior analysis, psychology, and special education) reported knowledge of the term stimulus preference assessment. While nearly 90% of behavior analysts reported using at least one direct method of SPA (i.e., an assessment involving direct observation and measurement of behavior), many reported personal lack of knowledge (18.6%) and lack of time (81.4%) as barriers to conducting these assessments on a regular basis. Survey results are discussed in terms of (1) the need for greater awareness and acceptance of reinforcer identification methods among behavior analysts, educators, and other service providers and (2) barrier-specific solutions to potentially increase the regularity of SPA usage in the education and treatment of individuals with developmental disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., MacDonald, R. P. F., & Chung, B. I. (2007). Assessing and treating vocal stereotypy in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 263–275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Behavior Analysis Certification Board. (2005). BCBA® and BCaBA® Behavior Analyst Task List (3rd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.bacb.com/index.php?page=100248

  • Bourret, J., Vollmer, T. R., & Rapp, J. T. (2004). Evaluation of a vocal mand assessment and vocal mand training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 129–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353–357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, C. A., Thompson, R. H., Hanley, G. P., & McKerchar, P. M. (2007). Teacher report and direct assessment of preferences for identifying reinforcers for young children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 157–166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., Fisher, W. W., Herman, K. M., & Crosland, K. C. (2000). Assessment of a response bias for aggression over functionally equivalent appropriate behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 73–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., Fisher, W. W., Rodriguez-Catter, V., Maglieri, K., Herman, K., & Marhefka, J. M. (2001). Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 463–473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, D. L., & Cautela, J. R. (1980). A proposed reinforcement survey schedule for special needs children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 11, 109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Adelinis, J. D., Thompson, R. H., Worsdell, A. S., & Zarcone, J. R. (1998). Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of “don’t” (and symmetrical “do”) requests. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 339–356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 15–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J., Jr. (1984). Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, R. B., & Karsten, A. M. (2012). Evaluation of a self-instruction package for conducting stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 69–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., White, L. K., Halford, R. C., Brittain, D. P., & Gardner, S. M. (1988). Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: Staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 31–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and ronresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulotta, C. S., Piazza, C. C., Patel, M. R., & Layer, S. A. (2005). Using food redistribution to reduce packing in children with severe food refusal. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 39–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, L. P., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2004). Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28, 668–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, D., Rodriguez, R., Levine, H. D., & Kloeckl, J. (1990). Brief report: Validation of a reinforcer survey for use with geriatric patients. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 5, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982.)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. N., Mandler-Provin, D., Latkowski, M. E., & McMahon, W. M. (1988). Development of a reinforcement survey for inpatient psychiatric children. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 9, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, A. M., Carr, J. E., & Lepper, T. L. (2011). Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Behavior Modification, 35, 347–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keehn, J. D., Bloomfield, F. F., & Hug, M. A. (1980). Use of the Reinforcement Survey Schedule with alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 3, 602–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1998). Social interaction skills for children with autism: A script-fading procedure for beginning readers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 191–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, L. P., Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H. (2006). Enhancing job-site training of supported workers with autism: A reemphasis on simulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 91–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte T., Liberman R. P., & Wallace, C. J. (2000). Identifying and using reinforcers to enhance the treatment of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 51, 1312–1314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. R., Carr, J. E., Almason, S. M., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). Early and intensive behavioral intervention for autism: A survey of clinical practices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R., Sacramone, S., Mansfield, R., Wiltz, K., & Ahearn, W. H. (2009). Using video modeling to teach reciprocal pretend play to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 43–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martella, R. C., Nelson, R., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (1999). Research methods: Learning to become a critical research consumer. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249–255.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Page, T. J., Iwata, B. A., & Neef, N. A. (1976). Teaching pedestrian skills to retarded persons: Generalization from the classroom to the natural environment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 433–444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605–620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, L. J. (2009). How do applied behavior analysis (ABA) therapists motivate children with autism? Retrieved from http://autism.about.com/od/alllaboutaba/f/abareinforcer.htm

  • Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(2). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html

  • Sulzer-Aaroff, B., Fleming, R., Tupa, M., Bass, R., & Hamad, C. (2008). Choosing objectives for a distance learning behavioral intervention in autism curriculum. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J. J., Allard, G. B., & Holborn, S. W. (1982). The good toothbrushers game: A school-based dental hygiene program for increasing the toothbrushing effectiveness of children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 171–176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tullis, C. A., Cannella-Malone, H. I., Basbigill, A. R., Yeager, A., Fleming, C. V., Payne, D., & Wu, P. (2011). Review of the choice and preference assessment literature for individuals with severe to profound disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 576–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L., Iwata, B. A., Goff, G. A., & Shore, B. A. (2001). Longitudinal analysis of leisure-item preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 179–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New England Center for Children, 33 Turnpike Rd., Southborough, MA, 01772, USA

    Richard B. Graff

  2. Western New England University, Springfield, USA

    Amanda M. Karsten

Authors
  1. Richard B. Graff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda M. Karsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard B. Graff.

Additional information

This study was completed by the first author in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree in Behavior Analysis at Western New England University. The authors express appreciation to Gregory Hanley, Rachel Thompson, and Eileen Roscoe for their helpful comments on the dissertation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graff, R.B., Karsten, A.M. Assessing Preferences of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: A Survey of Current Practices. Behav Analysis Practice 5, 37–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391822

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391822

Keywords

Search

Navigation