Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of residents in nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) using Resource Utilization Groups Version III (RUG-III)

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Samples of nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) classify their residents and determine their case-mix according to the Resource Utilization Groups System, Version III (RUG-III). Methods: A large sample of nursing homes was selected, based on willingness to participate, representation of both public and private institutions, and wide geographic representation. Two registered nurses assessed all residents using the RUG questionnaire. The information collected was then used to group residents into 44 RUGs, and facility-specific case-mix indices were calculated using the RUG-specific weights previously validated in Italy. Results: A total of 3981 residents from 93 nursing homes were assessed. Most residents were over 75 years old (87.4%) and women (68.6%). A large percentage was classified into RUGs within the following primary categories: reduced physical function (33.6%), impaired cognition (17.6%) and clinically complex (17.6%). The resulting nursing home case-mix indices ranged from 0.627 to 1.108 (mean 0.807±0.110). No significant association was found between type of facility, level of fees, or extent of staff in the nursing homes and their case-mix indices. Conclusions: RUG-III can provide information on types of nursing home residents and their care needs. This is useful for monitoring and evaluating long-term care services for the elderly, and allows for more effective planning and allocation of staffing and financial resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Region of Tuscany, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, INRCA Florence, Local Health Unit of Florence [Planning of services for the elderly in Tuscany], Florence, 2002.

  2. Bernabei R, Landi F, Zuccala G. Health care for older persons in Italy. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002; 14: 247–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rozzini R, Sabatini T, Trabucchi M. The network for elderly care in Italy: only a correct use of acute wards allows an overall functioning of the health care system. J Gerontol 2003; 58: 190–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fries BE, Cooney LM Jr. Resource utilization groups. A patient classification system for long-term care. Med Care 1985; 23: 110–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneider DP, Fries BE, Foley WJ, Desmond M, Gormley WJ. Case mix for nursing home payment: resource utilization groups, version II. Health Care Financ Rev 1988; Spec No: 39-52.

  6. Fries BE, Schneider DP, Foley WJ, Gavazzi M, Burke R, Cornelius E. Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III). Med Care 1994; 32: 668–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikegami N, Fries BE, Takagi Y, Ikeda S, Ibe T. Applying RUG-III in Japanese long-term care facilities. Gerontologist 1994; 34: 628–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Topinkova E, Neuwirth J, Mellanova A, Stankova M, Haas T. Case-mix classification in post-acute and long-term care. Validation of Resource Utilization Groups III (RUG-III) in the Czech Republic. Cas Lek Cesk 2000; 139: 42–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bjorkgren MA, Hakkinen U, Finne-Soveri UH, Fries BE. Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities. Scand J Public Health 1999; 27: 228–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carpenter I, Perry M, Challis D, Hope K. Identification of registered nursing care of residents in English nursing homes using the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) and Resource Utilisation Groups version III (RUG-III). Age Ageing 2003; 32: 279–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brizioli E, Bernabei R, Grechi F, et al. Nursing home case-mix instruments: validation of the RUG-III system in Italy. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003; 15: 243–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cotterill PG, Gage BJ: Overview: Medicare post-acute care since the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Health Care Financ Rev 2002; 24: 1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris JN, Fiatarone M, Kiely DK, et al. Nursing rehabilitation and exercise strategies in the nursing home. J Gerontol 1999; 54: M494–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Ferrucci MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francesconi, P., Cantini, E., Bavazzano, E. et al. Classification of residents in nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) using Resource Utilization Groups Version III (RUG-III). Aging Clin Exp Res 18, 133–140 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327428

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327428

Keywords

Navigation