Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Association between generic and disease-specific quality of life questionnaires and mobility and balance among women with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: The aims of this study were to assess correlations between two health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements, the Quality of Life Questionnaire issued by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO- 41) and the total score of The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-20) in a population of women living at home with well-established osteoporosis and at least one vertebral fracture, as well as the internal consistency and floor and ceiling effects of these measurements. Also examined were the mean values of these measurements, to ascertain whether they were significantly different for the group consisting of 75% of the women with the best performance on mobility and balance, compared with the other participants. Methods: Across-sectional study of 89 women aged 60 years or more, evaluated by QUALEFFO-41 (consisting of one total score and five section scores), GHQ-20 (one total score), maximum speed and Functional Reach (FR). Results: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for measurements of HRQOL ranged from 0.61 to 0.92. Significant correlations between ‘QUALEFFO- 41: total score’ and ‘GHQ-20: total score’ were 0.49, and between ‘GHQ-20: total score’ and section scores of ‘QUALEFFO-41’ 0.28-0.63. Those in the 75% group with the highest maximum walking speed or longest distance on FR reported significantly better disease-specific HRQOL than the others, with poorer results on these tests. Conclusions: Disease-specific and generic HRQOL instruments are not redundant when applied together, and the disease-specific ‘QUALEFFO-41’ and generic GHQ-20 measure different aspects of HRQOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abourazzak FE, Allali F, Rostom S et al. Factors influencing quality of life in Moroccan postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fracture assessed by ECOS 16 questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7: 23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meeks SM. The role of the physical therapist in the recognition, assessment, and exercise intervention in persons with, or at risk for, osteoporosis. Top Geriatric Rehabil 2005; 21: 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shea B, Bonaiuti D, Iovine R et al. Cochrane review on exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Euro Medicophys 2004; 40: 199–209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Papaioannou A, Adachi J, Winegard K et al. Efficacy of homebased exercise for improving quality of life among elderly women with symptomatic osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: 677–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ et al. Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 113–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergner M. Quality of life, health status, and clinical research. Med Care 1989: 27: 148–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patrick D, Bergner M. Measurement of health status in the 1990s. Annu Rev Public Health 1990; 11: 165–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Badia X, Diez-Perez A, Alvarez-Sanz C et al. Measuring quality of life in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis: A comparison of the OQLQ and QUALEFFO. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 307–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberto KA, McGraw S. Self-perceptions of older women with osteoporosis. J Women Aging 1991; 3: 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gold D. The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: Quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Bone 1996; 18: 185–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gold DT, Shipp KM, Lyles KW. Managing patients with complications of osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1998; 27: 485–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bayles CM, Cochran K, Anderson C. The psychosocial aspects of osteoporosis in women. Nurs Clin North Am 2000; 35: 279–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Werner P. Self-reported prevalence and correlates of osteoporosis: Results from a representative study in Israel. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2003; 37: 277–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Romagnoli E, Carnevale V, Nofroni I et al. Quality of life in ambulatory postmenopausal women: The impact of reduced bone mineral density and subclinical vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 975–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kocyigit H, Gulseren S, Erol A, Hizli N, Memis A. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Clin Rheumatol 2003; 22: 18–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bianchi ML, Orsini MR, Saraifoger S, Ortolani S, Radaelli G, Betti S. Quality of life in post-menopausal osteoporosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 78.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsauo J, Chien M, Yang R. Spinal performance and functional impairment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and osteopenia without vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 456–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schweitzer R, Kelly B, Foran A, Terry D, Whiting J. Quality of life in chronic fatigue syndrome. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ager A. ‘Quality of life’ assessment in a critical context. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2002; 15: 369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lips P, van Schoor NM. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 447–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999; 10: 150–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A et al. Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 1384–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scane A, Sutcliffe A, Francis R. The sequelae of vertebral crush fractures in men. Osteoporos Int 1994; 4: 89–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall S, Criddle R, Comito T, Prince R. A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9: 508–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reginster JY, Deroisy R, Paul I, Hansenne M, Ansseau M. Depressive vulnerability is not an independent risk factor for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 1999; 33: 133–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson F, Francis R, Faulkner K. Androgen supplementation in eugonadal men with osteoporosis — effects of 6 months of treatment on bone mineral density and cardiovascular risk factors. Bone 1996; 18: 171–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cook D, Guyatt G, Adachi J et al. Development and validation of the Mini-Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) in osteoporotic women with back pain due to vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1999; 10: 207–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Borchers M, Cieza A, Sigl T, Kollerits B, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Content comparison of osteoporosis-targeted health status measures in relation to the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health (ICF). Clin Rheumatol 2005; 24: 139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tosteson AN, Hammond CS. Quality-of-life assessment in osteoporosis: health-status and preference-based measures. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20: 289–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg DP. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph no.21, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Naughton M, Wiklund I. Dimension-specific instruments that may be used across cultures. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996: 633–58.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goldberg DP, Williams P (Eds.) Users’ guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spilker B. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ramírez Pérez E, Clark P, Wacher NH, Cardiel MH, del PilarDiez Garcáa M. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) in a Mexican population. Clin Rheumatol 2008; 27: 151–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Altman D. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McHorney C, Tarlov A. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 293–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Connelly D, Stevenson TJ, Vandervoort AA. Between- and within-rater reliability of walking tests in a frail elderly population. Physiother Canada 1996; 48: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 1990; 45: M192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Weiner DK, Bongiorni DR, Studenski SA, Duncan PW, Kochersberger GG. Does functional reach improve with rehabilitation? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 796–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46. de Oliveira Ferreira N, Arthuso M, da Silva R, Pedro AO, Neto AMP, Costa-Paiva L. Quality of life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: correlation between QUALEFFO 41 and SF-36. Maturitas 2009; 62: 85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Falch JA, Bentzen H, Dahl AA. Smerter, funksjonsnivå og emosjonelle forhold hos kvinner med osteoporose og vertebrale brudd. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 2003; 123: 3355–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Oleksik AM, Ewing S, Shen W, van Schoor NM, Lips P. Impact of incident vertebral fractures on health related quality of life (HRQOL) in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 861–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jakob F, Marin F, Martin-Mola E et al. Characterization of patients with an inadequate clinical outcome from osteoporosis therapy: The observational study of severe osteoporosis (OSSO). QJM 2006; 99: 531–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ozgocmen S, Kaya H, Fadillioglu E, Yilmaz Z. Effects of calcitonin, risedronate, and raloxifene on erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activity, lipid peroxidation, and nitric oxide in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Arch Med Res 2007; 38: 196–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lai PSM, Siew Siang C, Siew Pheng C, Low WY. Validation of the English version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) in Malaysia. Int J Rheum Dis 2008; 11: 421–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Murrell P, Todd C, Martin A, Walton J, Lips P, Reeve J. Postal administration compared with nurse-supported administration of the QUALEFFO-41 in a population sample: comparison of results and assessment of psychometric properties. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12: 672–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ferrucci L, Baldasseroni S, Bandinelli S et al. Disease severity and health-related quality of life across different chronic conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1490.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. O’Brien K, Culham E, Pickles B. Balance and skeletal alignment in a group of elderly female fallers and nonfallers. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci 1997; 52: 221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chow SB, Moffat M. Relationship of thoracic kyphosis to functional reach and lower-extremity joint range of motion and muscle length in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia: A pilot study. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2004; 20: 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway

    Astrid Bergland (Professor in Physiotherapy)

  2. Department of Physiotherapy, Hospital of Fredrikstad and Sarpsborg, Norway

    Hilde Thorsen & Rannveig Kåresen

Authors
  1. Astrid Bergland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hilde Thorsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rannveig Kåresen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid Bergland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergland, A., Thorsen, H. & Kåresen, R. Association between generic and disease-specific quality of life questionnaires and mobility and balance among women with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. Aging Clin Exp Res 23, 296–303 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324967

Key words

Search

Navigation