Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Working memory, control of interference and everyday experience of thought interference: when age makes the difference

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: A number of studies suggest that age differences in working memory may be attributed to age-related differences in inhibitory efficacy. Nevertheless, little is known about the impact of intrusive thoughts, which occurs in everyday situations on working memory performance. This study investigates the role of cognitive and everyday inhibition mechanisms in working memory performance. Methods: Young, young-old and old-old adults performed a working memory task and the White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI). Results: Results showed a decrease in working memory, and in inhibitory efficacy with age. In addition, old-old adults obtained higher scores in the three factors of the WBSI. Working memory performance was related to working memory control of interfering information in all age groups, and also to the tendency to suppress thoughts in old-old adults. The latter result was in the opposite direction with respect to observations collected with younger adults. Conclusions: Taken together, our results suggest the crucial role of intrusive thoughts in the functional capacity of working memory in late adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasher L, Zacks RT. Working memory, comprehension and aging: a review and new view. In Bower GH, Ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1988: 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman NP, Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 2004; 133: 101–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nigg JT. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 220–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasher L, Quig MB, May CP. Inhibitory control over no-longer-relevant information: adult age differences. Mem Cognit 1997; 25: 286–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewin CR, Beaton A. Thought suppression, intelligence and working memory capacity. Behav Res Ther 2002; 40: 923–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wegner DM, Schneider DJ, Carter SRIII, White L. Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 53: 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wegner DM, Zanakos, S. Chronic thought suppression. J Pers 1994; 62: 615–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumberg SJ. The white bear suppression inventory: revisiting its factor structure. Pers Individ Dif 2000; 29: 943–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Persad CC, Abeles N, Zacks RT, Denburg NL. Inhibitory changes after age 60 and their relationship to measures of attention and memory. J Gerontol 2002; 57: 223–32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hedden T, Park D. Aging and interference in verbal working memory. Psychology and Aging 2001; 16: 666–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Powers CB, Wisocki PA, Whitbourne SK. Age differences and correlates of worrying in young and elderly adults. Gerontologist 1992; 32: 82–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hess TM. Memory and aging in context. Psychol Bull 2005; 131: 383–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt S, Wisocki P, Yanko J. Worry and use of coping strategies among older and younger adults. J Anxiety Disord 2003; 17: 547–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Beni R, Palladino P, Pazzaglia F, Cornoldi C. Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. Q J Exp Psychol 1998; 51A: 305–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carretti B, Cornoldi C, De Beni R, Palladino P. What happens to information to be suppressed in working memory tasks? Short and long term effects. Q J Exp Psychol 2004; 57A: 1059–84.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Beni R, Palladino P. Intrusion errors in working memory task: are they related to reading comprehension ability? Learn Individ Differ 2000; 12: 131–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Beni R, Palladino P. Decline in working memory updating through ageing: intrusion error analyses. Memory 2004; 12: 75–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Osaka M, Nishizaki Y, Komori M, Osaka N. Effect of focus on verbal working memory: critical role of the focus word in reading. Mem Cognit 2002; 30: 562–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kane MJ, Engle RW. The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychon Bull Rev 2002; 9: 637–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kogan JL, Edelstein BA. Modification and psychometric examination of a self-report measure of fear in older adults. Anxiety Disord 2004; 18: 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crook T, Bartus RT, Ferris SH, Whitehouse P, Cohen GD, Gershon S. Age-associated memory impairment: proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change. Report of a National Institute of Mental Health work group. Dev Neuropsychol 1986; 2: 261–76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lindenberger U, Baltes PB. Intellectual functioning in old and very old age: cross-sectional results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol Aging 1997; 12: 410–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gamboz N, Russo R, Fox E. Age differences and the identity negative priming effect: an updated meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 2002; 17: 525–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Borella E, Carretti B, Mammarella IC. The relationship between working memory, proactive interference and fluid intelligence in young adults and elderly. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2006; 18: 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Smith AD, et al. Mediators of long-term memory performance across the lifespan. Psychol Aging 1996; 11: 621–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. de Ribaupierre A, Borella E, Delaloye C. Inhibition et variabilité individuelle: généralité ou spécificité des processus inhibiteurs. In Moutier S, Ed. Inhibition neurale et cognitive. Paris: Hermès, 2003: 103–24.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baltes PB, Smith J. New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology 2003; 49: 123–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells A, Davies MI. The thought control questionnaire: a measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behav Res Ther 1994; 32: 871–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wegner DM. White bears and other unwanted thoughts: suppression, obsession, and the psychology of mental control. New York: Viking/Penguin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baltes PB. Theoretical propositions of lifespan developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Dev Psychol 1987; 23: 611–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Conway ARA, Kane MJ, Bunting MF, Hambrick DZ, Wilhelm O, Engle RW. Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user’s guide. Psychon Bull Rev 2005; 12: 769–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Erika Borella PhD, Barbara Carretti, Cesare Cornoldi & Rossana De Beni

Authors
  1. Erika Borella PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Carretti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cesare Cornoldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rossana De Beni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borella, E., Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C. et al. Working memory, control of interference and everyday experience of thought interference: when age makes the difference. Aging Clin Exp Res 19, 200–206 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324690

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324690

Keywords

Search

Navigation