Skip to main content
Log in

Income differentials in functional disability in old age: Relative risks of onset, recovery, decline, attrition and mortality

  • New Section on Longitudinal Studies
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in health decline in late life may be underestimated, because the relatively higher risks of attrition of lower-SES persons are seldom taken into account. This longitudinal study aimed at comparing income differences in the course of disability, non-mortality attrition and mortality in older adults. Methods: A sample population of 3107 older adults who participated in the 1992/1993 baseline of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam was examined regarding changes in functional disability in 1998/1999. SES was indicated by household income. Results: Multinomial regression analyses revealed that, for men without disability at baseline, the relative rate for attrition was four times higher and the mortality rate was twice as high for low-income vs high-income persons. For non-disabled women, the relative risk for the onset of disability was nearly twice as high for low-income vs high-income persons. For both men and women, these risks decreased only slightly when behavioral and psychosocial risk factors were taken into account. Among persons with disability at baseline, the relative risks for attrition (for women) and mortality (for men) were twice as high for low-income persons, but no income differences were found with respect to recovery and decline. Adjustment for risk factors decreased the relative risks for attrition and mortality to a non-significant level. Conclusions: Income inequality in health in late life is to a large degree explained by the higher incidence of disability among lower-status women and by the higher attrition and mortality risks among lower-status men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berkman CS, Gurland BJ. The relationship among income, other socioeconomic factors and functional level in older persons. J Aging Health 1998; 101: 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer KU, Wagner M. Socioeconomic resources and differential aging. Ageing Soc 1993; 13: 517–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cairney J, Arnold R. Social class, health and aging. Socioeconomic determinants of self-reported morbidity among the non-institutionalized elderly in Canada. Can J Public Health 1996; 87: 199–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Salive ME. Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population. Ann Rev Public Health 1996; 17: 25–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Rossum CTM, Van de Mheen HD, Witteman JC, Mackenbach JP, Grobbee DE. Socioeconomic status and aortic atherosclerosis in Dutch elderly people: The Rotterdam Study. Am. J. Epidemiol 1999; 150: 142–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan GA, Seeman TE, Cohen RD, Knudsen LP, Guralnik J. Mortality among the elderly in the Alameda County Study: Behavioral and demographic risk factors. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 307–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shahtahmasebi S, Davies R, Wenger CG. A longitudinal analysis of factors related to survival in old age. Gerontologist 1992; 32: 404–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martelin T. Mortality by indicators of socioeconomic status among the Finnish elderly. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1257–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Amaducci L, Maggi S, Langlois J, et al. Education and the risk of physical disability and mortality among men and women aged 65 to 84: the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. J Gerontol 1998; 53: M484–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang J, McCarthy JF, Jain A, Krause N, Bennett JM, Shengzu G. Socio-economic gradient in old age mortality in Wuhan, China. J Gerontol 2000; 55: S222–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Melzer D, Izmirlian G, Leveille SM, Guralnik J. Educational differences in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age: The dynamics of incidence, mortality, and recovery. J Gerontol 2001; 56B: S294–301.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark DO, Stump TE, Wolinsky FD. Predictors of onset of and recovery from mobility difficulty among adults aged 51–61 years. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 63–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Strawbridge WJ, Cohen RD, Shema SJ, Kaplan GA. Successful aging: Predictors and associated activities. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144: 135–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martikainen P, Stansfeld S, Hemingway H, Marmot M. Determinants of socio-economic differences in change in physical and mental functioning. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 499–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Rourke N, MacLennan R, Hadjistavropoulos T, Tuokko H. Longitudinal examination of the functional status of older adults: Successful aging within a representative Canadian sample. Can J Aging 2000; 19: 441–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Unger JB, McAvay G, Bruce ML, Berkman L, Seeman T. Variation in the impact of social network characteristics on physical functioning in elderly persons: MacArthur studies on successful aging. J Gerontol 1999; 54: S245–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendes de Leon CF, Seeman TE, Baker DI, Richardson ED, Tinetti ME. Self-efficacy, physical decline, and change in functioning in community-living elders: A prospective study. J Gerontol 1996; 51B: S183–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grundy E, Glaser K. Socio-demographic differences in the onset and progression of disability in early old age: results from a British longitudinal study. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 149–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Deeg DJH. Attrition in longitudinal population studies: Does it affect the generalizability of the findings? An introduction to the series. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 213–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. House JS, Lepkowski JM, Kinney AM, Mero RP, Kessler RC, Herzog AR. The social stratification of aging and health. J Health Soc Behav 1994; 35: 213–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackenbach JP, Van de Mheen DH, Stronks K. A prospective cohort study investigating the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 299–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lynch J, Kaplan G. Socioeconomic position. In Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press 2000: 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lantz PM, House JS, Lepkowski JM, Williams DR, Mero RP, Chen J. Socio-economic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA 1998; 279: 1703–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schrijvers CT, Stronks K, Van de Mheen HD, Mackenbach JP. Explaining educational differences in mortality: the role of behavioral and material factors. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 535–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support and health. In Berkman, LF, Kawachi I, Eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000: 137–73.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kubzansky LD, Berkman LF, Glass TA, Seeman TE. Is educational attainment associated with shared determinants of health in the elderly? Findings from the MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 578–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bosma H, Schrijvers C, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and importance of perceived control: cohort study. BMJ 1999; 319: 1469–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaw BA, Krause N. Exploring race variations in aging and personal control. J Gerontol 2001; 56: S119–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Davey Smith G, Hart C, Blane D, Gillis C, Hawthorne V. Lifetime socio-economic position and mortality: a prospective observational study. BMJ 1997; 314: 547–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds JR, Ross CE. Social stratification and health: Education’s benefit beyond economics and social origins. Soc Probl 1998; 45: 221–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rios DA, Abdulah DR, Wei JY, Hausdorff JM. Disparate effects of socioeconomic status on physical function and emotional well-being in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2001; 13: 30–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Grundy E, Holt G. The socioeconomic status of older adults: How should we measure it in studies of health inequalities? J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55: 895–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Deeg DJH, Westendorp-de Serière M, Eds. Autonomy and well-being in the aging population II. Report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, 1992–1996. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Knipscheer CPM, De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA, Eds. Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Smit JH, Comijs HC. Longitudinaal onderzoek bij oudere respondenten: participatie en de kwaliteit van gegevens [Longitudinal research in elderly populations: participation and quality of data collected with questionnaires]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2000; 31: 184–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kriegsman DMW, Deeg DJH, Van Eijk JThM, Penninx BWJH, Boeke AJP. Do disease specific characteristics add to the explanation of mobility limitations in patients with different chronic diseases? A study in the Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 676–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Speer DC, Greenbaum PE. Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: Support for an individual growth curve approach. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995; 63: 1044–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schiepers JMP. Huishoudensequivalentiefactoren volgens de budgetverdelingsmethode [Family equivalence scales using the budget distribution method]. Suppl Sociaal-Economische Maand-statistiek 1988; 2: 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measurement 1977; 3: 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bedard M, Molloy DW, Bell R, Lever JA. Determinants and detection of low body mass index in community-dwelling adults with Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr 2000; 12: 87–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Heiat A, Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM. An evidence-based assessment of Federal guidelines for overweight and obesity as they apply to older persons. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 1194–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Van Tilburg TG. Delineation of the social network and differences in network size. In Knipscheer CPM, De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA, Eds. Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995: 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 1978; 19: 2–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Twisk J, De Vente W. Attrition in longitudinal studies: How to deal with missing data. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 329–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hoeymans N, Smit HA, Verkleij H, Kromhout D. Cardiovascular risk factors in relation to educational level in 36,000 men and women in the Netherlands. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 518–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Van der Meer JBW, Van den Bos J, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic differences in the utilization of health services in a Dutch population: The contribution of health status. Health Policy 1996; 37: 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Markides KS. Minority aging. In Riley MW, Hess BB, Bond K, Eds. Aging in society: Selected reviews of recent research. Hills-dale, NJ: Earlbaum, 1983: 115–37.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stronks K, Van de Mheen HD, Mackenbach JP. A higher prevalence of health problems in low income groups: does it reflect relative deprivation? J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 52: 548–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjolein I. Broese van Groenou Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Groenou, M.I.B., Deeg, D.J.H. & Penninx, B.W.J.H. Income differentials in functional disability in old age: Relative risks of onset, recovery, decline, attrition and mortality. Aging Clin Exp Res 15, 174–183 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324497

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324497

Key words

Navigation