Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lidocaine has been considered the gold standard for local analgesia agents in dentistry for years. Articaine is now widely used but there has been a reluctance to use it in children. REVIEW: Compared with lidocaine, articaine is 1.5 times as potent and only 0.6 times as toxic and has been shown to be superior in achieving successful anaesthesia following infiltration. The use of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) can be almost eliminated in children by using articaine due to its ability to effectively anaesthetise teeth up to the first permanent molar region. In addition, diffusion of the anaesthetic agent onto the palatal surface may also eliminate the discomfort of palatal infiltration. Soft tissue analgesia may be prolonged, but the risk of other adverse reactions is similar to other local anaesthetic agents. CONCLUSION: The use of articaine achieves successful pain control while reducing the volume administered and is advocated as a safe and effective alternative to lidocaine for use in children.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adewumi A, Hall M, Guelmann M, Riley J. The incidence of adverse reactions following 4% septocaine (articaine) in children. Pediatr Dent 2008; 30:424–428.
Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal analgesia efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142:493–504.
Brickhouse TH, Unkel JH, Webb MD, Best AM, Hollowell RL. Articaine use in children among dental practitioners. Pediatric Dentistry 2008; 30:516–521.
Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. Articaine infiltration for analgesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod 2008; 34:514–518.
Dudkiewicz A, Schwartz S, Laliberté R. Effectiveness of mandibular infiltration in children using the local anesthetic Ultracaine (articaine hydrochloride). J Can Dent Assoc 1987; 53:29–31.
Evans G, Nusstein J, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2008; 34:389–393..
Hass DA, Lennon D. A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration. J Can Dent Assoc 1995; 61:319–330.
Hasse A, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Drum M. Comparing analgesia efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar block. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139:1312.
Jakobs W, Ladwig B, Cichon P, Ortel P, Kirch W. Serum levels of articaine 2% and 4% in children. Anesth Prog 1995; 42: 113–115.
Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized doubleblind cross-over study. J Endod 2006;:296–298. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block. Int Endod J 2009; 42:238–246.
Katyal V. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lidocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis. J Dent 2010; 38:307–317.
Malamed SF. Handbook of local analgesia 4th ed. St Louis Mo. DV Mosby 1997.
Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of Articaine: a new amide local analgesia. J Am Dent Assoc 2000a; 131:635–642.
Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCL and lidocaine HCL in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent 2000b; 22:307–311.
Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:177–185.
Meecham JG. Local analgesia, risks and controversies. Dental Update 2009;36:278–283
Mikesell P, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J. A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Endod 2005; 31:265–270.
Odabas ME, Cinar C, Deveci C, Alaçam A. Comparison of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Mepivacaine in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind Study. Pediatr Dent 2012; 34:42–45.
Oertel R, Rahn R, Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997; 33:417–425.
Oertel R, Ebert U, Rahn R, Kirch W. The effect of age on pharmacokinetics of the local analgesia drug articaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24:524–528.
Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks— an update to include articaine. J Calif Dent Assoc 2007; 35:271–273.
Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, Indira R, Ramachandran S. Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod 2011; 37:1603–1607.
Ram D, Amir E. Comparison of articaine 4% and lidocaine 2% in paediatric dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16:252–256.
Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, McCartney M. The analgesia efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;:1104–1112.
Uckan S, Danangac E, Araz K. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:733–735.
Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Friedman CS, Plotzke OB. The use of articaine local anesthesia in children under 4 years of age: a retrospective report. Anaesth Prog 1989; 36:268–271.
Yilmaz Y, Eyuboglu O, Keles S. Comparison of the efficacy of articaine and prilocaine local analgesias for pulpotomy of maxillary and mandibular primary molars. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011; 12:117–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leith, R., Lynch, K. & O’Connell, A.C. Articaine use in children: A review. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 13, 293–296 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320829
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320829