Skip to main content
Log in

The role of parenting self-efficacy in childrenś social and academic behavior

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A latent variable structural model was constructed to test the relations among mothers’ and fathers’ parenting self-efficacy (PSE), their loneliness, and their child’s peer-evaluated social competence, self-evaluated loneliness, teacher-evaluated motivational orientation, and academic skills. In order to do this, first the Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index (Coleman & Karraker, 2000) was applied to a sample of mothers (n=876) and fathers (n=696) to test the relevance of these parenting task categories to Finnish mothers and fathers. The results of the latent variable structural model indicated a strong relationship between both mothers’ and fathers’ loneliness and their PSE, consisting of Nurturance, Discipline, Recreation, and Participation factors. Moreover, there was a modest relationship between parents’ PSE and their child’s social competence and consequently between social competence and child’s loneliness. The relationship between PSE and child’s academic achievement were mediated via child’s social competence.

Résumé

Dans la présente étude, nous avons construit un modèle structural de variables latentes afin d’étudier les relations entre des variables observées telles que le sentiment d’auto-efficacité des parents (père et mère), leur solitude, ainsi que l’évaluation par pairs de la compétence sociale de l’enfant, l’évaluation de la solitude par les enfants eux-mêmes, et finalement l’évaluation par les enseignants de l’orientation motivationnelle et les habiletés académiques de l’enfant. A cette fin, nous avons d’abord appliqué l’indice de tâc he pour mesurer la perception d’auto-efficacité parentale (the Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index; Coleman & Karraker, 2000) auprès d’un certain nombre de mères (n=876) et pères (n=696). Sur la base de ces résultats, nous en avons jugé la pertinence pour exploiter ces catégories de tâches parentales chez les mères finlandais. Il ressort des analyses effectuées par l’intermédiaire du modèle structural des variables latentes qu’il y a une corrélation étroite entre la solitude et le sentiment d’auto-efficacité par l’intermédiaire du modèle structural des variables latentes qu’il y a une corrélation étroite entre la solitude et le sentiment d’auto-efficacité parental et ceci aussi bien chez des mères que des pères. Les facteurs qui ont été pris en compte sont: la Nutrition et les Soins de santé, la Discipline, les Loisirs et la Participation. En outre, il y avait une corrélation modèrée entre le sentiment d’auto-efficacité parental et la compétence sociale de leur enfant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardelt, M., & Eccles, J.S. (2001). Effects of mothers’ parental efficacy beliefs and promotive parenting strategies on inner-city youth.Journal of Family issues, 22, 944–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S.R., & Wheeler, V.A. (1985). Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 500–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S.R., Parkhurst, J.T., Hymel, S., & Williams, G.A. (1990). Peer rejection and loneliness in childhood. In S.R. Asher & J.D. Coie (Eds.),Peer Rejection in Childhood (pp. 253–273). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R.A., & Nietzel, M.T. (1991). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of impulsivity in children: A meta-analytic review of the outcome literature,Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 400–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, L.J., Cassidy, J., & Belsky, J. (1995). Loneliness in young children and infant-mother attachment: A longitudinal study,Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier, A., Larose, S., Boivin, M., & Soucy, N. (2004). Attachment state of mind: Implications for adjustment to college,Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 783–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K., Small, S.A., & Tsay, J.C. (1997). Child, parent, and contextual influences on perceived parenting competence among parents of adolescents,Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, M., & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experiences and social self-perception: A sequential model.Developmentalk Psychology, 33, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyom, L.A., & Parke, R.D. (1995). The role of family emotional expressiveness in the development of children’s social competence.Journal of Marriage & Family, 57, 593–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, E.S., & Catton, R. (1999). Adolescents’ perceptions of aloneness and loneliness.Adolescence, 34, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W.M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1993). Popularity, friendship, and emotional adjustment during early adolescence. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & B. Laurson (Vol. Ed.),New Directions for Child Development (vol. 60, pp. 23–37). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, J. (1993). General interest. Children’s loneliness and their relationships with family and peers.Family Relations 42, 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, M., & Anderson, L.R. (1999). Social and emotional loneliness: Gender differences and relationships with self-monitoring and perceived control.Journal of Black Psychology, 25, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Kupersmidt, J.B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S.R. Asher & J.D. Coie (Eds.),Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59), New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P.K., & Karraker, K.H. (1998). Self-efficacy and parenting quality: Findings and future applications.Developmental Review, 18, 47–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P.K., & Karraker, K.H. (2000). Parenting self-efficacy among mothers of school-age children: Conceptualization, measurement and correlates.Family Relations, 49, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P.K., & Karraker, K.H. (2003). Maternal self-efficacy beliefs, competence in parenting, and toddlers’ behavior and developmental status.Infant Mental Health Journal, 24, 126–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, P.M., & DiLalla, D.L. (1988). Compulsive compliance: The development of an inhibitory coping strategy in infancy.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 585–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P.J., West, S.G., & Finch, J.F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C.E., & Troutman, B.R. (1986). Social support, infant temperament, and parenting self-efficacy: A mediational model of postpartum depression.Child Development, 57, 1507–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, P.L. (1991). The parent-child relationships of withdrawn, aggressive, and sociable children: Child and parent perspectives.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 425–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G.H. (1995). Life trajectories in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.),Self-efficacy in chancing societies (pp. 46–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T.W. (2000). The social dynamics of aggressive and disruptive behavior in school: Implications for behavior consultation.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11, 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, F.E. (1989). Inconsistent parenting: Is there evidence for a link between children’s conduct problems?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 17, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W.S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C.O., & Apostoleris, N.H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 538–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D., Conrad, B., Fogg, L., & Wothke, W. (1994). A longitudinal model of maternal self-efficacy, depression, and difficult temperament during toddlerhood.Research in Nursing & Health, 17, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, C., & Lewko, J.H. (1994). Gender differences in factors related to parenting style: A study of high performing science students.Journal of Adolescent Research, 9, 262–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henwood, P.G., & Solano, C.H. (1994). Loneliness in young children and their parents.The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M. (1982). Psychometric characteristics of the UCLA loneliness scale: A study with Iranian college students.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 917–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education?Review of Educational Research, 67, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., Battiato, A.C., Walker, J.M.T., Reed, R.P., DeJong, J.M., & Jones, K.P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework.Educational Psychologist, 36, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoza, B., Bukowski, W.M., & Beery, S. (2000). Assessing peer network and dyadic loneliness.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1984).Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised (WRAT-R). Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.L., & Prinz, R.J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review.Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2004).Interactive LISREL, version 8.7. Scientific Software International, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junttila, N., & Vauras, M. (2005). The social and emotional loneliness of fourth to fifth graders. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.

  • Junttila, N., Voeten, M., Kaukiainen, A., & Vauras, M. (2006). Multisource assessment of children’s social competence.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 874–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, S., & Bloomfield, L. (2005). Developing and validating a tool to measure parenting self-efficacy.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, V., & Elder, G.H. (1998). Perceived self-efficacy and grandparenting.Journal of Gerontology. Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53, 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G.W. (1992). Themes and theories: Perspectives on processes in family-peer relationships. In R.D. Parke & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Family-peer Relationships: Modes of Linkage (pp. 1–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G.W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood.Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S., & Kong, C.-K. (1999). The acceptance of lonely others: Effects of loneliness and gender of the target person and loneliness of the perceiver.The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawhon, T. (1997). Encouraging friendships among children.Childhood Education, 73, 228–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepola, J., Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2004). Understanding the development of subnormal performance in children from a motivational-interactionist perspective. In H.N. Switzky (Ed.),Personality and motivation systems in persons with mental retardation, international review of research in mental retardation (vol. 28, pp. 145–189). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, J. (1998).Ala-asteen lukutesti [Comprehensive school reading test]. University of Turku. Centre for Learning Research.

  • Lutz, W.J., & Hock, E. (2002). Parental emotions following the birth of the first child: Gender differences in depresive symptoms.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E.E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children.Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S., & Clifford, J. (2000). Genetic and environmental contributions to loneliness in children.Psychological Science, 11, 487–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, B.T. (1990). Factor analysis of the revised UCLA loneliness scale.Current Psychology, 9, 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, B.T., Besett-Alesh, T.M., Horibata, J., & Gat, I. (2002). Loneliness in high risk adolescents: The role of coping, self-esteem, and empathy.Journal of Youth Studies, 5, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melby, J.N., & Conger, R.D. (1996). Parental behaviors and adolescent academic performance: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsom, J., Beech, A.R., & Webster, S. (2003). Emotional loneliness in sexual murderers: A qualitative analysis.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus version 4.1. Statistical analysis with latent variables.

  • Nurmi, J.-E., Toivonen, S., Salmela-Aro, K., & Eronen, S. (1997). Social strategies and loneliness.The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 764–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olkinuora, E., & Salonen, P. (1992). Adaptation, motivational orientation, and cognition in a subnormally-performing child: A systemic perspective for training. In B. Wong (Ed.),Intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp. 190–213). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, R.M., & Scanlan, A. (1994). Childhood loneliness: Implications and strategies for childhood educators.Child Study Journal, 24, 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavri, S. (2001). Loneliness in children with disabilities.Teaching Exceptional Children, 33, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L.A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L.A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness. A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1–20). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretorius, T.B. (1993). The metric equivalence of the UCLA loneliness scale for a sample of South African students.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putallaz, M., & Heflin, A.H. (1990). Parent-child interaction. In S.R. Asher & J.D. Coie (Eds.),Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 189–216). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen, P. (1993). Consistency between two mathematical screening tests and teacher evaluations. Paper presented at the III European Congress of Psychology, Tampere, Finland.

  • Räsänen, P. (2004).RMAT — matematiikan suoritustesti 9–12 — vuotiaille.[RMAT — a test for mathematical achievement for ages 9 to 12]. Finland, Jyväskylä: Niilo Mäki Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen, P., & Koponen, T. (2005). NMART.Laskutaidon ja lukukäsitteen hallinnan tehtävistö. [Evaluation of the student’s arithmetical skills and number concept]. NMI. University of Jyväskylä.

  • Rotenberg, K.J. (1999). Childhood and adolescent loneliness: An introduction. In K.J. Rotenberg & H. Shelley (Eds.),Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 3–8). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K.H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J.G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 619–700). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, P. (1988). Learning disabled children’s situational orientations and coping strategies.Nordisk Pedagogik. 8, 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., & Olkinuora, E. (1998). Expectations and beyond: The development of motivation and learning in a classroom context. In J. Brophy (Ed.),Advances in research on teaching. Vol. 7: Expectations in the classroom (pp. 111–150). Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, P., Lyytinen, P., Kajamies, A., & Vauras, M. (2003).MOSU — Motivationaalisen suuntautumisen arviointi. [Evaluation of the student’s motivational orientation]. University of Turku, Centre for Learning Research.

  • Schoenrock, C.J., Bell, N.J., Sun, S.-W., & Avery, A.W. (1999). Family correlates of adolescent self-monitoring and social competence.Journal of Psychology, 33, 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumow, L., & Lomax, R. (2002). Parental efficacy: Predictor of parenting behavior and adolescent outcomes.Parenting Science and Practice, 2, 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E., & Edge, K. (2002). Parenting, motivation, and the development of children’s coping.Nebraska Symposium in Motivation, 48, 77–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S.M. (2000). Childhood loneliness: Implications and intervention considerations for family therapists.The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 8, 161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement.Educational Psychology Review, 17, 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach.Multivariate Behavior Research, 25, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swick, K.J., & Hassell, T. (1990). Parental efficacy and the development of social competence in young children.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 17, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teti, D.M., & Gelfand, D.M. (1991). Behavioral competence among mothers of infants in the first year: The mediational role of maternal self-efficacy.Child Development, 62, 918–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vauras, M., & Junttila, N. (in press). Children’s loneliness, social competence, and school success: The role of the family.Scientific Annals of the Psychological Society of Northern Greece.

  • Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., & Lepola, J. (2001). Long-term development of motivation and cognition in family and school contexts. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.),Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical and methodological implications (pp. 285–305). Advances in Learning and Instruction, 11. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R.S. (1973).Loneliness. The experience of emotional and social isolation. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K.R. (1998). Parents’ aspirations for children’s educational attainments: Relations to parental beliefs and social address variables.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niina Junttila.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Junttila, N., Vauras, M. & Laakkonen, E. The role of parenting self-efficacy in childrenś social and academic behavior. Eur J Psychol Educ 22, 41–61 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173688

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173688

Keys word

Navigation