Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing a family literacy program: Challenges and successes

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Early Childhood Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper describes a family literacy project that involved parents whose children were attending a pre-school centre in a low socio-economic suburb of Perth, Western Australia. A formative experimental design was used to examine the home literacy practices of the families as described by the parents, and to construct a series of workshops. The parents described a range of literacy practices that took place in their homes; the workshop series aimed to value and build on these practices and the parents’ prior knowledge of children’s literacy development. After some initial difficulties, the parents and the teacher/researcher jointly constructed the workshop topics, which included early literacy development, viewing and computer practices, personal, reading and reading to children. At the end of the program the parents reported that they had gained new knowledge, had become more aware of the literacy practices of their homes and how these might influence their children’s literacy development, and had experienced some change of behaviour. Factors that appeared to facilitate the program and some of the difficulties encountered are identified and discussed.

Résumé

Cet article décrit un projet d’alphabétisation au sein de la famille concernant les parents d’élèves de maternelle d’un centre scolaire d’une banlieue ouvrière de Perth, Western Australia. Le projet démarra avec la mise en place d’un programme de formation expérimental afin d’analyser les pratiques d’alphabétisation au sein des familles, basé sur la description des parents, ainsi que d’organiser une série d’ateliers. Les parents décrirent toute une série de pratiques d’alphabétisation ayant lieu au sein de leurs familles, les ateliers ayant pour objectif d’analyser et d’améliorer ces pratiques en s’appuyant sur leurs connaissances préalables dans le domaine du développement de l’alphabétisation de l’enfant. Une fois surmontées quelques difficultés initiales, les parents et l’enseignant/chercheur développèrent ensemble le contenu des ateliers, avec des sujets comprenant le développement de l’alphabétisation dans la petite enfance, les heures passées devant la télé, l’utilisation de l’ordinateur, la lecture individuelle et la lecture aux enfants. A la fin du projet, les parents reconnurent avoir acquis plus de connaissances, être devenus plus conscients de leurs pratiques d’alphabétisation et la manière dont ces pratiques sont susceptibles d’influencer le développement de leurs enfants, et avoir modifié d’une certaine mesure leur comportement. Cet article identifie et décrit en détail les facteurs susceptibles d’avoir facilité le projet, ainsi que certaines des difficultś rencontrées.

Resumen

Este articulo describe un proyecto de alfabetización familiar centrado en los padres de alumnos de un centro preescolar de un barrio obrero de Perth, Western Australia. En primer lugar, se empleó un programa formativo experimental con el fin de analizar los hábitos de alfabetización en el hogar de las distintas familias, basándose en la información proporcionada por los padres, lo que permitió diseñar una serie de talleres. La información proporcionada por los padres incluyó todo un abanico de hábitos de alfabetización, siendo el objetivo de los talleres el de evaluar y trabajar sobre esos hábitos y sobre los conocimientos previos de los padres relativos al tema del desarrollo de la alfabetización infantil. Tras superar una serie de dificultades, los padres y el profesor/investigador diseñaron conjuntamente el contenido de los talleres, con temas como el desarrollo precoz de la alfabetización, horas pasadas frente al televisor, hábitos de uso del ordenador, lectura individual y lectura a los niños. Al finalizar el proyecto, los padres reconocieron haber adquirido neuvos conocimentos, ser más conscientes de sus hábitos de alfabetización en el hogar y el efecto potential de dichos hábitos en el desarrollo de sus hijos, y haber experimentado un cierto cambio en su comportamiento. Este articulo identifica y explica los factores que parecieron facilitar el programa y algunas de las dificultades encontradas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerbach, E.R. (1995). Which way for family literacy: Intervention or empowerment? In L. Morrow (Ed.),Family Literacy Connections in Schools and Communities (pp. 11–26. Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.S. (2001). Preschool education for economically disadvantaged children: Effects on reading achievement and related outcomes. In S.B. Neuman & D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 421–443). New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. (1995). Exploring family literacy.Reading.29(3), 2–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bus, A.G., van Ijzendoorn, M.H., & Pelligrini, A.D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy.Review of Educational Research, 65, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, T.H. (1994). Moving towards new partnerships in education.Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 17(4), 262–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, T.H. & Munsie, L. (1992).Beyond tokenism: Parents as partners in literacy. Carlton: Australian Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (1998).Literacy for All: The Challenge for Australian Schools. Australian Schooling Monograph Series No. 1/1998. Canberra, Australia: Department for Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, C.J., Arthur, L., Beecher, B., & McNaught, M. (2000). Multiple literacies in early childhood: What do families and communities think about their children’s early literacy learning?The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(3), 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (1995). Empowering low-income mothers and fathers to share books with young children.The Reading Teacher, 48(7), 558–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (1995). Empowering low-income mothers and fathers to share books with young children.The Reading Teacher, 48(7), 558–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadsden, V. L. (2000). Intergenerational literacy within families. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.),Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. III) (pp. 871–887). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (1996). Literacy and social minds In G. Bull & M. Anstey (Eds.),The literacy lexicon (pp. 5–16). Sydney: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, T. (1996). Pause, Prompt, Praise: Reading tutoring procedures for home and school partnership. In: S. Wolfendale & K. Topping (Eds.),Family involvement in literacy (pp. 33–44). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. (1991). The sense of being literate: Historical and cross-cultural features. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & D.P. Pearson, (Eds.),Handbook of reading research (pp. 3–25). New York: Longman Publishing Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, E. (1992). Culture, context and cognition. In M.D. Lecompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.),The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 293–335. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, R.T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low-literacy Latina/o readers in middle school.Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 224–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Bianco, J. & Freebody, P. (1997). Australian Literacies: Informing national policy on literacy education. Canberra: Language Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Comber, B., & O’Brien, J. (1996). Critical literacies and cultural studies. In G. Bull & M. Anstey (Eds.),The literacy lexicon (pp. 31–46). Prentice Hall: Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L.C. (1994). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer. (Eds.),Theoretical processes and models of reading (pp. 179–207). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, L. (1995). Family literacy — New perspectives, new practices. In L. Morrow (Ed.),Family Literacy Connections in Schools and Communities (pp. 5–10). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, L., & Paratore, J. (1993). Family literacy: Perspective and practices.The Reading Teacher, 47(3), 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, G. (2003, March). Improving oral reading fluency (and comprehension) through the creation of talking books.Reading Online 6(7). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=oakley/index.html

  • Paratore, J. (1995). Implementing an intergenerational literacy project: Lessons learned. In: L. Morrow (Ed.),Family literacy connections in schools and communities (pp. 37–53). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell-Gates, V., L’Allier, S., & Smith, D. (1995). Literacy at the Harts’ and the Larsons’: Diversity among poor, inner-city families.The Reading Teacher, 48(7), 572–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary studients’ independent reading.Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 384–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohl, M. (1994). Home and school literacy practices. In Breen, M., Louden, W., Barrat-Pugh, C. Rivalland, J., Rohl, M., Rhydwen, M., Lloyd, C., & Carr, T.,Literacy in its Place: Literacy practices in urban and rural communities (Vol. I) (pp. 123–124). Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998).Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, D.S. (2002). The importance of effective early intervention. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.)What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 69–86). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (1983).Family literacy. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D., & Dorsey-Gaines, C. (1988).Growing up literate: Learning from inner city families. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K.J. (1996). The effectiveness of family literacy. In S. Wolfendale & K. Topping (Eds.),Family Involvement in Litracy (pp. 149–163). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K.J. (1997). Family electronic literacy: Home-school links through computers.Reading, 31(2), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K.J. & Wolfendale, S. (1995). The effectiveness of family literacy programs.Reading, 29(3), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Rohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jay, J., Rohl, M. Constructing a family literacy program: Challenges and successes. IJEC 37, 57–78 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165832

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165832

Keywords

Navigation