Skip to main content
Log in

Normative data for the Dutch version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire

  • Article
  • Published:
Netherlands Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Worry is a common symptom in various psychiatric problems and the key symptom of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is the most widely used self-report scale for measuring worry. The present study provides normative data for the Dutch version of the PSWQ for a large community sample and a clinically referred sample of patients with GAD. Norms are not only provided for the original 16-item version, but also for an abbreviated 11-item version, which only consists of the positively worded items and has been shown to be a promising alternative to the full-length version. The percentile scores obtained for the community sample and the clinical GAD sample did not show much overlap, and this appeared true for the full-length as well as the abbreviated version of the PSWQ. These normative data seem suitable for differentiating between normal and abnormal manifestations of worrying and for evaluating the efficacy of treatments for GAD. (Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 69-75.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. Text Revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Beck, J. G., Stanley, M. A., & Zebb, B. J. (1995). Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in older adults. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 1, 33-42.

  • Behar, E., Alcaine, O., Zuellig, A. R., & Borkovec, T. D. (2003). Screening for generalized anxiety disorder using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 25-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.A. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1411-1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., Antony, M. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1992). Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 33-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. (1994). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Interview.

  • Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Mennin, D. S., & Turk, C. L. (2002). Confirmatory analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 313-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresco, D. M., Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2003). Using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire to identify individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 283-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, M. M., Haaga, D. A. F., & Ford, G. T. (1995). Normative values for the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Fear Questionnaire, Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 7, 450-455.

  • Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hazlett-Stevens, H., Ullman, J. B., & Craske, M. G. (2004). Factor structure of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Examination of a method factor. Assessment, 11, 361-370.

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Grove, W. M. (1988). Normative comparisons in therapy outcome. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 147-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Sheldrick, R. C. (2000). Normative data for normative comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 767-773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof, A., Hermans, D., Figee, A., Laeremans, I., Pieters, G., & Aardema, A. (2000). De Penn State Worry Questionnaire en de Worry Domains Questionnaire: Eerste resultaten bij Nederlandse en Vlaamse klinische en poliklinische populaties (The Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Worry Domains Questionnaire: First results in Dutch and Flemish clinical populations). Gedragstherapie, 33, 135-146.

  • Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487-495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabshin, M. (1989). Normality and the boundaries of psychopathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3, 259-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Startup, H. M., & Erickson, T. M. (2006). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). In: G. C. L. Davey, & A. Wells (Eds.), Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265-283). Chichester, England: Wiley.

  • Stöber, J. (1995). Worrying: A comparison of three questionnaires concerning everyday worries. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 16, 50-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heiden, C., Muris, P., Bos, A. E. R., & van der Molen, H. T. (submitted for publication). Factor structure of the Dutch version of the PSWQ in a community sample and in a sample of patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

  • Van Rijsoort, S., Vervaeke, G., & Emmelkamp, P. (1997). De Penn State Worry Questionnaire en de Worry Domains Questionnaire: Eerste resultaten bij een normale Nederlandse populatie (The Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Worry Domains Questionnaire: First results in a normal Dutch population). Gedragstherapie, 30, 121-128

  • Van Rijsoort, S., Emmelkamp, P., & Vervaeke, G. (1999). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Worry Domains Questionnaire: Structure, reliability and validity. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 297-307.

  • Woods, C. M. (2006). Careless responding to reverse-worded items: Implications for confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28, 189-194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin van der Heiden.

Additional information

Outpatient Treatment Centre PsyQ, Rotterdam and Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Correspondence to Colin van der Heiden, PsyQ, Van Vollenhovenstraat 3 (2nd floor), 3016 BE Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Submitted 11 February 2009: revision accepted 29 March 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Heiden, C., Muris, P., Bos, A.E.R. et al. Normative data for the Dutch version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. NEJP 65, 69–75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080129

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080129

Navigation