Skip to main content
Log in

Welke vragenlijst bij welke patiënt?

  • Meetinstrumenten
  • Published:
Stimulus

Samenvatting

Dit artikel pretendeert niet alle problemen rond vragenlijsten op te lossen, maar geprobeerd wordt de problemen hieromtrent enigszins te structureren. Daarbij komt in het bijzonder de vraag aan de orde ‘wat is het doel van het meten?’ en ‘hoe kies ik het meest geschikte meetinstrument bij dat doel?’. In vervolgnummers van Stimulus zal met regelmaat een vragenlijst specifiek worden belicht, of een set van vragenlijsten worden toegelicht aan de hand van een casusbespreking. Daarin komen andere aspecten naar voren, zoals de methodologische kwaliteit, problemen bij de interpretatie van een score en dergelijke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figuur 1
Figuur 2
Figuur 3

Literatuur

  • Beekman CE, Axtell L, Nordland KS, West JY. Self-concept: an outcome of a program for spinal pain. Pain 1985;22:59-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subacute low back trouble. Spine 1995;20:722-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. The economics of spinal disorders. In: JW Frymoyer (ed). The adult spine: principles and practice. New York: Raven Press, 1991:85-105.

  • Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.

  • Fredrickson B, Trief PM, Beveren P van, Yuan HA, Baum G. Rehabilitation of the patient with chronic back pain: a search for outcome predictors. Spine 1988;13:351-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Mayer TG. The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability. Spine 1995;20:2702-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldorson EMH, Indahl A, Ursin H. Patients with low back pain not returning to work: a 12-mounth follow-up study. Spine 1998;23:1202-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A, Mellin G, Hurri H, Luoma J. Health locus of control beliefs and psychological distress as predictors for treatment outcome in low back pain patients: Results of a 3-mounth follow-up of a controlled intervention study. Pain 1991;46:35-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenbring M, Marienfield G, Kuhlendahl D, Soyka D. Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients. Spine 1994;19:2759-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe FJ, Kashikar-Zuck S. Pain in arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders: the role of coping skills training and exercise interventions. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1996;24:279-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenerman L, Slade PD, Stanley M, e.a. The prediction of chronicity in patients with an acute attack of low back pain in general practice setting. Spine 1995;20:473-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köke AJA, Heuts PHTG, Vlaeyen JWS, Weber WEJ. Meetinstrumenten Chronische Pijn. Deel 1 Functionele status. Maastricht: Pijn Kennis Centrum Maastricht, 1999.

  • Liebenson C, Yeomans S. Outcome assessment in musculoskeletal medicine. Manual Therapy 1997;2(2):67-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeser JD. Disability, pain and suffering. Clinical Neurosurgery 1989;35:398-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main CJ, Watson PJ. Psychological aspects of pain. Manual Therapy 1999;4:203-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stomp-van den Berg SGM, Vlaeyen JWS, Kuile MM ter, Spinhoven P, Breukelen G van, Kole-Snijders AMJ. Meetinstrumenten Chronische Pijn. Deel 2 Pijn Coping en Cognitie Lijst (PCCL). Maastricht: Pijn Kennis Centrum Maastricht, 2001.

  • Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment 1995;7(4):524-32.

  • Swinkels RAHM, Oostendorp RAB. The ICF-classification as a system for structuring outcome measurement. Aangeboden.

  • Triet EF van, Dekker J, Kerssens JJ, Curfs EC. Reliability of the assessment of impairments and disabilities in survey research in the field of physical therapy. International Disabilities Studies 1990;12:61-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JA, Jensen MP, Romano JM. Do beliefs, coping, and catastrophizing independently predict functioning in patients with chronic pain? Pain 2000;85(1-2):115-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G. Fear of movement/(re)injury, avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther 1999;4(4):187-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Genève: World Health Organization, 1980.

  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health Problems. Genève: World Health Organization, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

fysiotherapeut, bewegingswetenschapper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swinkels, R.A.H.M. Welke vragenlijst bij welke patiënt?. STIM 22, 156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03063013

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03063013

Navigation