Samenvatting
Within the Netherlands, there is a controversy regarding the question to what extent the SCL-90 can be considered an eight-dimensional self-assessment scale for psychopathology. Recently, the Dutch group who introduced the SCL-90 in the Netherlands again defended the premise that the SCL-90 has a structure of eight dimensions, on the basis of LISREL analyses on the SCL-90 scores of a large group of pain patients. In our study, also using the confirmatory factor analytic LISREL model, we investigated to what extent an eight-dimensional structure for the SCL-90 could be found in a large group of psychiatric patients (n = 1219). A parsimonious dimensional structure sufficiently explained our SCL-90 data. A reduced dimensionality was found for the Dutch SCL-90. The differences between the results of our study and the earlier findings of the Dutch promoters of the SCL-90 are mainly due to their accommodating application of the fit criteria. (Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 63, 29-35.)
References
Arrindell, W.A. & Ettema, J.H.M. (1986). Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Arrindell, W.A. & Ettema, J.H.M. (2003). Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers.
Arrindell, W.A., Boomsma, A., Ettema, H., Stewart, R. (2004a). Verdere steun voor het multidimensionale karakter of the SCL-90-R. De Psycholoog, 39, 195-201.
Arrindell, W.A., Boomsma, A., Ettema, H., Stewart, R. (2004b). Nog meer steun voor het multidimensionale karakter of the SCL-90-R. De Psycholoog, 39, 368-371.
Bonynge, E.R. (1993). Unidimensionality of SCL-90-R scales in adult and adolescent crisis sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 212-215.
Carpenter, K.M. & Hittner, J.B. (1995). Dimensional characteristics of the SCL-90-R: evaluation of gender differences in dually diagnosed inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 383-390.
Derogatis, L.R. Lipman, R.S. & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90, an outpatient psychiatric rating scale –preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13-28.
Derogatis, L.R. & Cleary, P.A. (1977). Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: a study in construct validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 981-989.
Hafkenscheid, A. (1993). Psychometric evaluation of the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) in psychiatric inpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 751-756.
Hafkenscheid, A. J. P. M. (1994). Rating scales in treatment efficacy studies: individualized and normative use. Groningen (unpublished thesis).
Hafkenscheid, A., Kuipers, A., Marinkelle, A. (1998). De vragenlijst als effectmaat bij ‘N = 1’: hoe bruikbaar zijn statistische definities van ‘klinische significantie’ en ‘betrouwbare verandering’? Gedragstherapie, 31, 221-239.
Hafkenscheid, A. (2004a). Hoe multidimensionaal is de SCL-90 nu eigenlijk? De Psycholoog, 39, 191-194.
Hafkenscheid, A (2004b) Verdere steun voor het multidimensionale karakter of the SCL-90? Antwoord aan Arrindell, Boomsma, Ettema & Stewart (2004) De Psycholoog, 39, 366-368.
Hessel, A., Schumeighter, J. Geyer, M. & Brähler, E. (2001). Symptom Checkliste SCL-90 R. Testtheoretische Uberprufing und Normierumg an einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Stichprobe. Diagnostica, 47, 27-39.
Holi, M.M., Sammallahti, P.R. & Aalberg, V.A. (1998). A Finnish validation study of the SCL-90. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 97, 42-46.
Lipman, R.S., Covi, L. & Shapiro, A.K. (1979). The Hopkins symptom checklist; factors derived from the HSCL-90. Journal of Affective Disorders, 1, 9-24.
Schmitz, N., Hartkamp, N, Kiuse, J., Franke, G.H., Reister, G. & Tress, W. (2000). The Symptom Checklist: A German validation study. Quality of Life Research, 9, 185-193.
Vassend, O. & Skrondal, A. (1999). The problem of structural indeterminacy in multidimensional symptom report instruments. The case of SCL-90-R. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 685-701.
Veeninga, A.T. & Hafkenscheid, A. (2002). Patiëntgerichte kwaliteit van zorg. Een methode om te evalueren of patiënten bereiken wat ze wensen. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 28, 38-53.
Veeninga, A.T. & Hafkenscheid, A. (2004a). Verwachtingen van patiënten bij aanvang van psychotherapie: voorspellers van drop-out? Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 30, 187-195.
Veeninga, A.T. & Hafkenscheid, A (2004b). De Patiënten Behoeften Vragenlijst (PBV). Gedragstherapie, 37, 197-203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
* Sinai Centre, Jewish Mental Health Services, Amersfoort
** Methodology and Statistics Capacity Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht
Correspondence to: Anton Hafkenscheid, Sinai Centre, Jewish Mental Health Services, PO Box 66, NL 3800 AB Amersfoort. E-mail: a.hafkenscheid@sinaicentrum.nl
Submitted 8 December 2005; revision accepted 25 October 2006.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hafkenscheid, A.J., Maassen, G.H. & Veeninga, A.T. The dimensions of the Dutch SCL-90: more than one, but how many?. NEJP 63, 25–30 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03061059
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03061059