Skip to main content
Log in

Attachment, mating, and parenting

An evolutionary interpretation

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modern evolutionary perspective emphasizing life history theory and behavioral ecology is brought to bear on the three core patterns of attachment that are identified in studies of infants and young children in the Strange Situation and adults using the Adult Attachment Interview. Mating and parenting correlates of secure/autonomous, avoidant/dismissing, and resistant/preoccupied attachment patterns are reviewed, and the argument is advanced that security evolved to promote mutually beneficial interpersonal relations and high investment parenting; that avoidant/dismissing attachment evolved to promote opportunistic interpersonal relations and low-investment parenting; and that resistant/preoccupied attachment evolved to foster “helper-at-the-nest” behavior and indirect reproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, M. 1973 The Development of Infant-Mother Attachment. InReview of Child Development Research, Vol. 3, B. M. Caldwell and H. N. Ricciuti, eds. Pp. 1–94. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R., and M. Bellis 1995Human Sperm Competition. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. 1997 Variation in Susceptibility to Environmental Influence: An Evolutionary Argument.Psychological Inquiry 8:182–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., and J. Cassidy 1994 Attachment: Theory and Evidence. InDevelopment Through Life: A Handbook for Clinicians, M. Rutter and D. Hay, eds. Pp. 373–402. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., L. Steinberg, and P. Draper 1991 Childhood Experience, Interpersonal Development and Reproductive Strategy: An Evolutionary Theory of Socialization.Child Development 62:647–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1992 Reproductive Decisions. InEvolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, E. A. Smith and B. Winterholder, eds. Pp. 147–179. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. 1969Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1. Attachment. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K., and P. Shaver 1991 Dimensions of Attachment and the Dynamics of Romantic Relationships. Unpublished ms., Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo.

  • Buss, D. 1995 Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science.Psychological Inquiry 6:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., and L. Berlin 1995 The Insecure/Ambivalent Pattern of Attachment: Theory and Research.Child Development 65:971–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. 1993Life History Invariants. New York: Oxford.

  • Chisholm, J. 1996 The Evolutionary Ecology of Attachment Organization.Human Nature 7:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, D., P. Cowan, C. Cowan, and J. Pearson 1992a Mothers’ and Fathers’ Working Models of Childhood Attachment Relationships, Parenting Style, and Child Behavior.Development and Psychopathology 4:417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1992b Working Models of Childhood Attachment and Couples Relationships.Journal of Family Issues 13:432–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby 1987 From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link. InThe Latest and the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, J. Dupre, ed. Pp. 277–306. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, J., and S. Feldman 1988 Mothers’ Internal Models of Relationships and Children’s Behavioral and Developmental Status: A Study of Mother-Child Interaction.Child Development 59:1273–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1991 Mothers’ Working Models of Attachment Relationships and Mother and Child Behavior During Separation and Reunion.Developmental Psychology 27:597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S., P. Wrege, and N. Demong 1995 Making Decisions in the Family: An Evolutionary Perspective.American Scientist 83:148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, K., and M. Pratt 1995 The Role of Adult Romantic Attachment in Marital Communication and Parenting Stress. Poster presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis.

  • Feeney, J., and P. Noller 1990 Attachment Style as a Predictor of Adult Romantic Relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58:281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Attachment Style and Romantic Love: Relationship Dissolution.Australian Journal of Psychology 44:69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., H. Steele, and M. Steele 1991 Maternal Representations of Attachment during Pregnancy Predict the Organization of Infant-Mother Attachment at One Year of Age.Child Development 62:891–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. 1995 Of the Way We Were: Adult Memories about Attachment Experiences and Their Role in Determining Infant-Parent Relationships.Psychological Bulletin 117:404–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, K., E. Fremer-Bombik, J. Rudolph, and K. E. Grossmann 1988 Maternal Attachment Representation as Related to Patterns of Infant-Mother Attachment and Maternal Care during the First Year. InRelationships within Families, R. Hinde and J. Stevenson-Hinde, eds. Pp. 241–262. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haft, W., and A. Slade 1989 Affect Attunement and Maternal Attachment: A Pilot Study.Infant Mental Health Journal 10:157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. E. 1994Continuity and Discontinuity of Attachment from Infancy through Adolescence. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., and P. Shaver 1987 Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E., J. Young, and J. Nord 1994 Childhood Adversity, Attachment Security, and Adult Relationships.Ethology and Sociobiology 15:323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. 1982 Attachment: Some Conceptual and Biological Issues. InThe Place of Attachment in Human Behavior, C. Murray Parker and J. Stevenson-Hinde, eds. Pp. 213–256. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R., and J. Stevenson-Hinde 1990 Attachment: Biological, Cultural and Individual Desiderata.Human Development 33:62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A., and K. Davis 1994 Attachment Style, Gender and Relationship Stability: A Longitudinal Analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:502–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L., and C. Hazan 1994 Attachment Styles and Close Relationships: A Four Year Prospective Study.Personal Relationships 1:123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobak, R., and C. Hazan 1992 Parents and Spouses: Attachment Strategies and Marital Functioning. Unpublished ms. in the authors’ possession, University of Delaware.

  • Kobak, R., R. Ferenz-Gillies, E. Everhart, and L. Seabrook 1994 Maternal Attachment Strategies and Emotion Regulation with Adolescent Offspring.Journal of Research on Adolescence 4:553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J., and N. Davies, eds. 1991Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, third ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunce, L., and P. Shaver 1994 An Attachment-Theoretical Approach to Caregiving in Romantic Relationships. InAdvances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 5, K. Bartholomew and D. Perlman, eds. Pp. 205–237. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M., R. Thompson, E. Charnov, and D. Estes 1985Infant-Mother Attachment. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M., R. Thompson, W. Gardner, and E. Charnov 1984 Security of Infantile Attachment as Assessed in the “Strange Situation”: Its Study and Biological Interpretation.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:127–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M. 1990 Cross-Cultural Strategies of Attachment and Attachment Organization: Recent Studies, Changing Methodologies, and the Concept of Conditional Strategies.Human Development 33:48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E., H. Pan, D. Treboux, E. Waters, J. Crowell, D. Teti, and G. Posada 1995 Women’s Adult Attachment Security and Quality of Marriage. Unpublished ms. in the authors’ possession, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Owens, G. 1993 An Interview-Based Approach to the Study of Adult Romantic Relationships. Unpublished ms. in the author’s possession, State University of New York, Stony Brook.

  • Pistole, M. 1989 Attachment in Adult Romantic Relationships: Styles of Conflict Resolution and Relationship Satisfaction.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 6:505–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciuti, A. 1992Child-Mother Attachment: A Twin Study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senchak, M., and K. Leonard 1992 Attachment Style and Marital Adjustment among Newlywed Couples.Journal of Social and Personality Development 9:51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P., and C. Hazan 1993 Adult Romantic Attachment: Theory and Evidence.Advances in Personal Relationships 4:29–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. 1990 Influences of Attachment Styles on Romantic Relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:971–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J., W. Rholes, and J. Nelligan 1992 Support Seeking and Support Giving Within Couples in an Anxiety-Provoking Situation: The Role of Attachment Styles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62:434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A. 1988 The Role of Infant-Caregiver Attachment in Development. InClinical Implications of Attachment, J. Belsky and T. Nezworski, eds. Pp. 18–40. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. 1993 The Role of Development in the Evolution of Life Histories. InEvolution and Development, J. Bonner, ed. Pp. 13–40. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Boom, D. 1995 The Influence of Temperament and Mothering on Attachment and Exploration.Child Development 65:1449–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ijzendoorn, M. 1995 Adult Attachment Representations, Parental Responsiveness, and Infant Attachment: a Meta-Analysis on the Predictive Validity of the Adult Attachment Interview.Psychological Bulletin 117:387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ijzendoorn, M., and M. Brakermans-Kranenburg 1996 Attachment Representations in Mothers, Fathers, Adolescents and Clinical Groups: A Meta-Analytic Search for Normative Data.Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology 64:8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ijzendoorn, M., M. Kranenburg, H. Zwart-Woudstra, A. van Busschbach, and M. Lambermon 1992 Parental Attachment and Children’s Socio-Emotional Development: Some Findings on the Validity of the Adult Attachment Interview in The Netherlands.International Journal of Behavioral Development 14:375–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. J., and E. Carlson 1995 Associations among Adult Attachment Representations, Maternal Sensitivity, and Infant-Mother Attachment in a Sample of Adolescent Mothers.Child Development 66:69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, E., S. Merrick, L. Albersheim, and D. Treboux 1995 Attachment Security from Infancy to Early Adulthood: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study. Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis.

  • Zimmerman, P. 1994Bindung im Jugendalter: Entwicklung und Umgang mit aktuellen Andorderungen [Attachment in Adolescence: Development and Interaction with Present Circumstances]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Regensburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Belsky.

Additional information

Work on this paper was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH44604) and the Sara Scaife Family Foundation.

Jay Belsky is Distinguished Professor of Human Development, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Penn State University. Trained in the traditions of main-stream developmental psychology and family sociology, he has broadened his research interests to include the determinants and consequences of family relations in infancy and early childhood, the effects of day care, the etiology of child maltreatment, and the ecology of human development more generally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belsky, J. Attachment, mating, and parenting. Hum Nat 8, 361–381 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02913039

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02913039

Key words

Navigation