Skip to main content
Log in

Tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use in patients with glaucoma who are switched to the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use and to monitor changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first 6 mo after a switch to fixed combination latanoprost/timolol. In Germany, 271 general ophthalmology practices enrolled patients who were switched from previous ocular hypotensive therapies to latanoprost/timolol for medical reasons. Usual care routines were followed, and IOP was measured at baseline and approximately 6 mo later. Adverse events were recorded throughout. Immediately before switching and at follow-up, patients completed a 29-item quality-of-life questionnaire. Of 1052 patients who met analysis criteria, 748 (71%) switched from combination therapy and 304 (29%) from monotherapy. An insufficient IOP reduction with the previous therapy was a reason for switching in 71% of patients; the desire to simplify to once-daily administration was cited in 66%. Ocular adverse events were reported in 19 patients after the switch, and 97% remained on therapy throughout the follow-up period. After switching, patients were less likely to forget to instill their eyedrops or to feel that their drops had adverse effects; they found it easier to include eyedrop administration in their routine; they were more satisfied with the frequency of instillation; and they were more likely to want to continue with the drops. Across all previous therapies, mean IOP decreased from 20.6±3.7 mm Hg to 17.2±2.8 mm Hg after the switch (P < .001)—a 14.8% difference. Fixed combination latanoprost/timolol is well tolerated and effective in patients who are switched from other monotherapies or combination therapies for medical reasons. Such a switch may be associated with improved quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diestelhorst M, Almegard B. Comparison of two fixed combinations of latanoprost and timolol in open-angle glaucoma.Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998; 236: 577–581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Higginbotham EJ, Feldman R, Stiles M, Dubiner H, for the Fixed Combination Investigative Group. Latanoprost and timolol combination therapy versus monotherapy: one-year randomized trial.Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 915–922.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pfeiffer N, for the European Latanoprost Fixed Combination Study Group. A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with its individual components.Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 240: 893–899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shin DH, Feldman RM, Sheu WP, for the Fixed Combination Latanoprost/Timolol Study Group. Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/ timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 276–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Sanchez J, Rouland JF, Spiegel D, et al. A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a six month, evaluator masked, multicentre study in Europe.Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88: 877–883.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Day D, Sharpe ED. Efficacy and safety of timolol maleate/latanoprost fixed combination versus timolol maleate and brimonidine given twice daily.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003; 81: 242–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamacher T, Schinzel M, Schölzel-Klatt A, et al. Short term efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients changed to the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination from monotherapies and adjunctive therapies.Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88: 1295–1298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Diestelhorst M, Larsson L-I, for the European-Canadian Latanoprost Fixed Combination Study Group. A 12-week, randomized, double-masked multicenter study of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in the evening versus the individual components.Ophthalmology. 2006; 113: 70–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haverkamp F, Wuensch S, Fuchs M, Stewart WC. Intraocular pressure, safety and quality of life in glaucoma patients switching to latanoprost from adjunctive and monotherapy treatments.Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004; 14: 407–415.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmerman TJ, Stewart WC, for the Latanoprost Axis Study Group. Intraocular pressure, safety, and quality of life in glaucoma patients switching to latanoprost from monotherapy treatments.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 19: 405–415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson ES, Mozaffari E. Measuring patient persistency with drug therapy using methods for the design and analysis of natural history studies.Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(suppl 10): S249-S254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reardon G, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Patient persistency with topical ocular hypotensive therapy in a managed care population.Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137(suppl 1): S3-S12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz GF, Reardon G, Mozaffari E. Persistency with latanoprost or timolol in primary openangle glaucoma suspects.Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137(suppl 1): S13-S16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reardon G, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Patient persistency with ocular prostaglandin therapy: a population-based, retrospective study.Clin Ther. 2003; 25: 1172–1185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dasgupta S, Oates V, Bookhart BK, Vaziri B, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Population-based persistency rates for topical glaucoma medications measured with pharmacy claims data.Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(suppl 10): S255-S261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spooner JJ, Bullano MF, Ikeda LI, et al. Rates of discontinuation and change of glaucoma therapy in a managed care setting.Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(suppl 10): S262-S270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gurwitz JH, Glynn RJ, Monane M, et al. Treatment for glaucoma: adherence by the elderly.Am J Public Health. 1993; 83: 711–716.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel SC, Spaeth GL. Compliance in patients prescribed eyedrops for glaucoma.Ophthalmic Surg. 1995; 26: 233–236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Dunker MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunker, S., Schmucker, A., Maier, H. et al. Tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use in patients with glaucoma who are switched to the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol. Adv Therapy 24, 376–386 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849907

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849907

Keywords

Navigation