Abstract
This study was undertaken to assess tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use and to monitor changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first 6 mo after a switch to fixed combination latanoprost/timolol. In Germany, 271 general ophthalmology practices enrolled patients who were switched from previous ocular hypotensive therapies to latanoprost/timolol for medical reasons. Usual care routines were followed, and IOP was measured at baseline and approximately 6 mo later. Adverse events were recorded throughout. Immediately before switching and at follow-up, patients completed a 29-item quality-of-life questionnaire. Of 1052 patients who met analysis criteria, 748 (71%) switched from combination therapy and 304 (29%) from monotherapy. An insufficient IOP reduction with the previous therapy was a reason for switching in 71% of patients; the desire to simplify to once-daily administration was cited in 66%. Ocular adverse events were reported in 19 patients after the switch, and 97% remained on therapy throughout the follow-up period. After switching, patients were less likely to forget to instill their eyedrops or to feel that their drops had adverse effects; they found it easier to include eyedrop administration in their routine; they were more satisfied with the frequency of instillation; and they were more likely to want to continue with the drops. Across all previous therapies, mean IOP decreased from 20.6±3.7 mm Hg to 17.2±2.8 mm Hg after the switch (P < .001)—a 14.8% difference. Fixed combination latanoprost/timolol is well tolerated and effective in patients who are switched from other monotherapies or combination therapies for medical reasons. Such a switch may be associated with improved quality of life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Diestelhorst M, Almegard B. Comparison of two fixed combinations of latanoprost and timolol in open-angle glaucoma.Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998; 236: 577–581.
Higginbotham EJ, Feldman R, Stiles M, Dubiner H, for the Fixed Combination Investigative Group. Latanoprost and timolol combination therapy versus monotherapy: one-year randomized trial.Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 915–922.
Pfeiffer N, for the European Latanoprost Fixed Combination Study Group. A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with its individual components.Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 240: 893–899.
Shin DH, Feldman RM, Sheu WP, for the Fixed Combination Latanoprost/Timolol Study Group. Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/ timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 276–282.
Garcia-Sanchez J, Rouland JF, Spiegel D, et al. A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a six month, evaluator masked, multicentre study in Europe.Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88: 877–883.
Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Day D, Sharpe ED. Efficacy and safety of timolol maleate/latanoprost fixed combination versus timolol maleate and brimonidine given twice daily.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003; 81: 242–246.
Hamacher T, Schinzel M, Schölzel-Klatt A, et al. Short term efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients changed to the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination from monotherapies and adjunctive therapies.Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88: 1295–1298.
Diestelhorst M, Larsson L-I, for the European-Canadian Latanoprost Fixed Combination Study Group. A 12-week, randomized, double-masked multicenter study of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in the evening versus the individual components.Ophthalmology. 2006; 113: 70–76.
Haverkamp F, Wuensch S, Fuchs M, Stewart WC. Intraocular pressure, safety and quality of life in glaucoma patients switching to latanoprost from adjunctive and monotherapy treatments.Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004; 14: 407–415.
Zimmerman TJ, Stewart WC, for the Latanoprost Axis Study Group. Intraocular pressure, safety, and quality of life in glaucoma patients switching to latanoprost from monotherapy treatments.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 19: 405–415.
Johnson ES, Mozaffari E. Measuring patient persistency with drug therapy using methods for the design and analysis of natural history studies.Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(suppl 10): S249-S254.
Reardon G, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Patient persistency with topical ocular hypotensive therapy in a managed care population.Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137(suppl 1): S3-S12.
Schwartz GF, Reardon G, Mozaffari E. Persistency with latanoprost or timolol in primary openangle glaucoma suspects.Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137(suppl 1): S13-S16.
Reardon G, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Patient persistency with ocular prostaglandin therapy: a population-based, retrospective study.Clin Ther. 2003; 25: 1172–1185.
Dasgupta S, Oates V, Bookhart BK, Vaziri B, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Population-based persistency rates for topical glaucoma medications measured with pharmacy claims data.Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(suppl 10): S255-S261.
Spooner JJ, Bullano MF, Ikeda LI, et al. Rates of discontinuation and change of glaucoma therapy in a managed care setting.Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(suppl 10): S262-S270.
Gurwitz JH, Glynn RJ, Monane M, et al. Treatment for glaucoma: adherence by the elderly.Am J Public Health. 1993; 83: 711–716.
Patel SC, Spaeth GL. Compliance in patients prescribed eyedrops for glaucoma.Ophthalmic Surg. 1995; 26: 233–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunker, S., Schmucker, A., Maier, H. et al. Tolerability, quality of life, and persistency of use in patients with glaucoma who are switched to the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol. Adv Therapy 24, 376–386 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849907
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849907