Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes of “Inadequate” antidepressant treatment

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes of primary care patients receiving low levels of antidepressant treatment.

DESIGN: Cohort study comparing patients receiving antidepressant treatment within and below the recommended dosing range.

SETTING: Primary care clinics of a staff-model health maintenance organization.

PATIENTS: Primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment for depression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 88 patients beginning antidepressant treatment, 49 (56%) used “adequate” doses for 30 days or more. Likelihood of “adequate” pharmacotherapy was not related to patient age, gender, medical comorbidity, or baseline depression severity. All the patients showed substantial clinical improvement after four months. Compared with those using “adequate” pharmacotherapy, the patients receiving low-intensity treatment had lower likelihood of clinical response (64% vs 84%; chi-square=4.44; df=1; p=0.035). At four months, however, those receiving low-intensity and those receiving higher-intensity treatment did not differ significantly in either the score on the 20-item Symptom Checklist depression scale (18.91 and 15.72, respectively; F=1.45; df=1, 86; p=0.23) or the proportion with persistence of major depression (10% and 4%, respectively; chi-square=1.30; df=1; p=0.25). A replication sample of 157 patients (assessed only at baseline and four months) yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS: While the patients receiving recommended levels of pharmacotherapy showed somewhat higher improvement rates, many of the patients receiving “inadequate” treatment experienced good short-term outcomes. Efforts to increase the intensity of depression treatment in primary care should focus on the subgroup of patients who fail to respond to initial treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wells K, Stewart A, Hays R, et al. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989;262:914–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. VonKorff M, Ormel J, Katon WJ, Lin EHB. Disability and depression among high utilizers of health care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:91–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Broadhead WE, Blazer DG. George LK, Tse CK. Depression, disability days and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiologic survey. JAMA. 1990;264:2524–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenberg P, Stiglin LE, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER. The economic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;54:405–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon G. Ormel J, VonKorff M, Barlow W. Health care costs associated with depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:352–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Regier D, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Mandersheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system: epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:85–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beardsley RS, Gardocki GJ, Larson DB, Hidalgo J. Prescribing of psychotropic medication by primary care physicians and psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:1117–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. VonKorff M, Shapiro S, Burke JD, et al. Anxiety and depression in a primary care clinic: comparison of Diagnostic Interview Schedule, General Health Questionnaire, and practitioner assessments. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:152–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Simon G, VonKorff M. Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 1995A;4:99–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care: Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1993.

  11. Johnson DAW. A study of the use of antidepressant medication in general practice. Br J Psychiatry. 1974;125:186–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Magruder-Habib K, Zung WWK, Feussner JR, Ailing WC, Saunders WB, Stevens HA. Management of general medical patients with symptoms of depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1989;11:201–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haggerty JJ, Evans DL, McCartney CF, Raft D. Psychotropic prescribing patterns of nonpsychiatric residents in a general hospital in 1973 and 1982. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1986;37:357–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rost K, Williams C, Wherry J, Smith GR. The process and outcomes of care for major depression in rural family practice settings. J Rural Health. 1995;11:114–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wells K, Katon W, Rogers B, Camp P. Use of minor tranquilizers and antidepressant medications by depressed outpatients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:694–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Katon W, VonKorff M, Lin E, Bush T, Ormel J. Adequacy and duration of antidepressant treatment in primary care. Med Care. 1992;30:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon G, VonKorff M, Wagner EH, Barlow W. Patterns of antidepressant use in community practice. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1993;15:399–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Katon W. Lin EHB, VonKorff M. et al. Predictors of persistence of affective symptoms in primary care. J Affect Disord. 1994;31:81–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Elkin I, Shea T, Watkins JT, et al. National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:971–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Paykel ES, Hollyman JA, Freeling P, Sedgwick P. Predictors of therapeutic benefit from amitriptyline in mild depression: a general practice placebo-controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 1988;14:83–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saunders K, Stergachis A, VonKorff M. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. In: Strom B (ed) Pharmacoepidemiology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Katon W, VonKorff M. Lin E, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines: impact on depression in primary care. JAMA. 1995;273:1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P. The CAGE Questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 1974;131:1121–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Derogatis L. SCL-90R: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Clinical Psychometrics Unit, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lin E, VonKorff M. Katon W, et al. The role of the primary care physician in patients’ adherence to antidepressant therapy. Med Care. 1995;33:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Simon G, VonKorff M, Revicki D. Telephone assessment of depression severity. J Psychiatr Res. 1993A:27:247–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Third Edition, Revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rush A, Giles DE, Schlesser MA, Fulton CL, Weissenburger J, Burns C. The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology: preliminary findings. Psychiatry Res. 1986;18.

  29. VonKorff M, Wagner EH, Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992A:45:197–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Costa P, McCrae RR. The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington

    Gregory E. Simon MD, MPH, Elizabeth H. B. Lin MD, MPH, Kathleen Saunders, Michael VonKorff ScD, Terry Bush PhD & Patricia Robinson PhD

  2. the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

    Gregory E. Simon MD, MPH, Wayne Katon MD, Michael VonKorff ScD & Edward Walker MD

Authors
  1. Gregory E. Simon MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth H. B. Lin MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wayne Katon MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kathleen Saunders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael VonKorff ScD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Edward Walker MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Terry Bush PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Patricia Robinson PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported by NIMH grants #MH41739 and #51338.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simon, G.E., Lin, E.H.B., Katon, W. et al. Outcomes of “Inadequate” antidepressant treatment. J Gen Intern Med 10, 663–670 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602759

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602759

Key words

Search

Navigation