Skip to main content
Log in

Patients’ perceived involvement in care scale:

Relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report describes the development of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS), a self-report questionnaire for patients, and its relation to primary care patients’ attitudes regarding their illnesses and the management of them. The questionnaire was administered to three independent samples of adult primary care patients. Patients’ satisfaction and their attitudes regarding their illnesses are evaluated after their medical visits. This instrument is designed to examine three relatively distinct factors: 1) doctor facilitation of patient involvement, 2) level of information exchange, and 3) patient participation in decision making. Of these factors, doctor facilitation and patient decision making were related significantly to patients’ satisfaction with care. Doctor facilitation and information exchange related consistently to patients’ perceptions of post-visit changes in their understanding, reassurance, perceived control over illness, and expectations for improvement in functioning. The role of physicians in enhancing patient involvement in care and the potential therapeutic benefits of physician facilitative behavior are addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barsky AJ III. Patient heal thyself: activating the ambulatory medical patient. J Chron Dis. 1976;29:585–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haug MR, Lavin B. Public challenge of physician authority. Med Care. 1979;17:844–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brody DS. The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:718–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegler M. Searching for moral certainty in medicine: a proposal for a new model of the doctor—patient encounter. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1981;57:56–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Blum MJ, Smith DG. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;4:506–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schulman AB. Active patient orientation and outcomes in hypertensive treatment. Med Care. 1979;17:267–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monographs 1977; Winter:281–315.

  8. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr., Yano EM, Frank HJL. Patients’ participation in medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:448–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Wasserman L. The customer approach to patienthood: attending to patient requests in a walk-in clinic.

  11. Slack WV. The patient’s right to decide. Lancet. 1977;2:240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiore N. Fighting cancer—one patient’s perspective. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:284–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Korsch BM, Gozzi EK, Francis V. Gaps in doctor—patient communication: doctor—patient interaction and satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968;42:855–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Svarstad B. Physician-patient communication and patient conformity with medical advice. In: Mechanic D. The growth of bureaucratic medicine. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hayes-Bautista DE. Modifying the treatment: patient compliance, patient control and medical care. Soc Sci Med. 1976;10:223–38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Langer EJ, Janis IL, Wolfer JA. Reduction of psychological stress in surgical patients. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1975;11:155–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Langer EJ, Rodin J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;34:191–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowers KS. Pain, anxiety and perceived control. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1968;32:596–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pennebaker JW, Burnam A, Schaeffer MA, Harper DC. Lack of control as a determinant of perceived physical symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;35:167–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor SE. Adjustment to threatening events: a theory of cognitive adaptation. Am Psychol. 1983; Nov:1161–72.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seeman M, Seeman T. Health behavior and personal autonomy: a longitudinal study of the sense of control in illness. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:144–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brody DS, Miller SM. Illness concerns and recovery from URI. Med Care. 1986;24:742–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR. Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with health care services. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976.

  24. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care, in press.

  25. Friedson E. Professional dominance. Chicago:Adline, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wasserman RC, Inui TS, Barriatua BS, Carter WB, Lippincott P. Pediatric clinicians’ support for parents makes a difference: an outcome-based analysis of clinician-parent interaction. Pediatrics. 1984;74:1047–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eisenthal S, Lazare A. Evaluation of the initial interview in a walk-in clinic: the patient’s perspective on a “customer approach”. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976;162:169–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eisenthal S, Emery R, Lazare A, Udin H. “Adherence” and the negotiated approach to patienthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36:393–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lerman, C.E., Brody, D.S., Caputo, G.C. et al. Patients’ perceived involvement in care scale:. J Gen Intern Med 5, 29–33 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602306

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602306

Key words

Navigation