Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in physicians’ decision-making thresholds in management of a sexually transmitted disease

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To gain insight into the variation in physicians’ clinical decisions and further understand the factors that influence physicians’ thresholds for testing and treating.

Design: Written clinical scenarios were mailed to two groups of physicians who were asked to provide probability estimates of syphilis, how these estimates might change with new information, and when a diagnostic test would be ordered or treatment begun. A model was then used to calculate the probabilities at which physicians ordered tests or initiated treatment.

Participants: Group 1 comprised 126 board-certified internists from metropolitan Philadelphia responding from a sample of 360 such physicians randomly selected from a directory. Group 2 consisted of 31 experts in sexually transmitted disease responding from a sample of 50 experts selected by the authors.

Measurements and main results: Experts were willing to obtain a serologic screening test at a lower likelihood of syphilis (0.013%) than were internists (0.034%), and they were willing to obtain a lumbar puncture at a lower likelihood of neurosyphilis (0.165%) than were internists (0.393%). The difference in the groups’ thresholds to begin neurosyphilis treatment was not significant. A multivariate model showed that group differences were created by individual characteristics (years in practice, subspecialty board certification, and full-time nonacademic practice) that were associated with higher thresholds for serologic screening.

Conclusions: There are differences in the diagnostic testing practices for syphilis between national experts and internists. Although status in one of these groups alone did not predict the threshold for obtaining syphilis tests, certain individual characteristics were predictive. Examination of physician characteristics helps to explain the variation observed in their practice patterns, and determination of physicians’ thresholds aids in analyzing these variations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982;246:120–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wennberg JE, McPherson K, Caper P. Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs? N Engl J Med. 1984;311:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenberg JM. Doctors’ decisions and the cost of medical care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:229–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:1109–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberg JM, Hershey JC. Derived thresholds: determining the diagnostic probabilities at which clinicians initiate testing and treatment. Med Decis Making. 1983;3:155–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberg JM, Schumacher HR, Davidson PIC, Kaufman L. Usefulness of synovial fluid analysis in the evaluation of joint effusions: use of threshold analysis and likelihood ratios to assess a diagnostic test. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:715–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Young MJ, Eisenberg JM, Williams SV, Hershey JC. Comparing aggregate estimates of derived thresholds for clinical decisions. Health Serv Res. 1986;20:763–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiesel J, Rose DN, Silver AL, Sacks HS, Bernstein RH. Lumbar puncture in asymptomatic late syphilis: an analysis of the benefits and risks. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145:465–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dans PE, Cafferty L, Otter SE, Johnson RJ. Inappropriate use of the cerebrospinal fluid venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test to exclude neurosyphilis. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:86–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lukehart SA, Hook EW, Baker-Zander SA, Collier AC, Critchlow CW, Hansfield HH. Invasion of the central nervous system byTreponema pallidum: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:855–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eisenberg JM, Nicklin D. Use of diagnostic services by physicians in community practice. Med Care. 1981;19:297–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wallsten TS. Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information. Med Decis Making. 1981;1:145–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tversky A. Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science. 1985;1:1124–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Section of General Internal Medicine (Department of Medicine), Department of Decision Sciences and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the Section of General Medicine (Department of Medicine), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Dr. Winkenwerder is currently with the The Prudential/PruCare Southern Group Operations, Atlanta, Georgia.

Supported in part by the National Center for Health Services Research (Grant#HS 04953) and the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkenwerder, W., Levy, B.D., Elsenberg, J.M. et al. Variation in physicians’ decision-making thresholds in management of a sexually transmitted disease. J Gen Intern Med 8, 369–373 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600075

Key words

Navigation