Abstract
The authors conducted an observational study of attending rounds to determine the current status of this form of clinical teaching in a university-based internal medicine department. Using two forms of measurement, questionnaires and timed observations, we found that 63% of attending physician time was spent in the conference room, 26% in hallways, and only 11% at the bedside. Significant differences were found between estimated and actual times, particularly in discussing previously admitted patients, patient interactions, data reviews, topic presentations, and the category of “other” activities. These results provide a framework for appraising attending rounds and identifying areas that may be improved with a teaching workshop intervention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Shankel SW, Mazzaferri, EL. Teaching the resident in internal medicine—present practices and suggestions for the future. JAMA. 1986;256:725–9.
Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988;211–3.
Kroenke K, Simmons JO, Copley, JB, Smith C. Attending rounds: a survey of physician attitudes. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:229–33.
Engel GL. The deficiencies of the case presentation as a method of clinical teaching—another approach. N Engl J Med. 1971;284:20–4.
Linfors EW, Neelon FA. The case for bedside rounds. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:1230–3.
Reichsmann F, Browning FE, Hinshaw JR. Observations of undergraduate clinical teaching in action. J Med Educ. 1964;39:147–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the Biomedical Research Support Grant Committee, Grant No.BRSG (2S07 RR05675-22).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, M., Johnson, B., Greene, H.L. et al. An observational study of attending rounds. J Gen Intern Med 7, 646–648 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599208
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599208