Skip to main content
Log in

Patients’ interpretations of probability terms

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study objectives:To assess the meanings ascribed by patients to qualitative expressions of probability commonly used in medical care and to determine patient preferences for obtaining information when communicating with their physicians about medical risk numerically and/or qualitatively.

Design:Cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients.

Setting:A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs medical center.

Participants:133 patients sequentially seen in a general medicine clinic.

Measurements and results:Subjects were given a randomly ordered list of 12 common terms, each a qualitative expression of probability. They were asked to indicate what they understood to be the numerical meaning of each word. The patients’ probability estimates were found to comprise two groups of five terms each, with high intercorrelations among the probabilities assigned to the terms in each group. Mean probabilities assigned to terms in the first group all were greater than 60%, and mean probabilities assigned to terms in the second group all were below 50%. When asked whether they wanted chance information to be provided in numerical or qualitative terms, 32% reported that they wanted it only numerically; 35.3% wanted it only qualitatively; 21.8% wanted the information either way; and 8.3% wanted the information both ways.

Conclusions:The numerical meanings that patients ascribe to probability terms fall into identifiable patterns. While patients vary in the actual values they assign to terms, the relative meanings of terms show consistent trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Newell GR, Vogel VG. Personal risk factors: what do they mean? Cancer. 1988;62:1695–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential. CA. 1987;37:33–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kong A, Barnett GO, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:740–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrison DF. Multivariate statistical methods. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mazur DJ. Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: treatise on informed consent for primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:370–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shmerling RH, Bedell SE, Lilienfeld A, Delbanco TL. Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a study of elderly outpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:317–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toogood JH. What do we mean by “usually” [letter]? Lancet. 1980;1:1094.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kenney RM. Between never and always [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:1097–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bryant GD, Norman GR. Expressions of probability: words and numbers [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakao MA, Axlerod S. Numbers are better than words: verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine. Am J Med. 1983;74:1061–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mosteller F and Youtz C. Quantifying probability expressions. Stat Sci. 1990;5:2–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazur, D.J., Hickam, D.H. Patients’ interpretations of probability terms. J Gen Intern Med 6, 237–240 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598968

Key words

Navigation