Skip to main content
Log in

A controlled trial to increase office visits and reduce hospitalizations of diabetic patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An intervention package was examined to determine its effectiveness in increasing office visits and in reducing the incidence of nonelective hospitalizations (those for urgent or emergent reasons). The intervention included mailings of information, appointment reminders, and intense follow-up by telephone of visit failures for rescheduling. Eight hundred fifty-four patients receiving drug therapy for diabetes mellitus were stratified by risk of nonelective hospitalization and randomly assigned to the control group or the intervention group. After two years, the intervention group averaged 9.1 per cent more kept scheduled visits per month than the control group (0.371 vs. 0.340, p=0.02). However, the mean incidence of nonelective hospitalizations per month was not significantly different between intervention and control groups (0.040 vs. 0.041, p=0.9), nor was there a difference in nonelective hospital days per month (0.443 vs. 0.425, p=0.7). The authors conclude that while mailings and telephone calls can increase office visits, the intervention is not sufficient to reduce morbidity necessitating nonelective hospitalizations of diabetic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller LV, Goldstein J. More efficient care of diabetic patients in a county-hospital setting. N Engl J Med 1972;286:1388–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Runyan JW, Vander Zwaag R, Joyner B, Miller ST. The Memphis diabetes continuing care program. Diabetes Care 1980;3:382–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schroeder SA. Lowering broken appointment rates at a medical clinic. Med Care 1973;11:75–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gates SJ, Colborn DK. Lowering appointment failures in a neighborhood health center. Med Care 1976;14:263–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shepard DS, Moseley TAE. Mailed versus telephoned appointment reminders to reduce broken appointments in a hospital outpatient department. Med Care 1976;14:268–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bigby JA, Giblin J, Pappius EM, Goldman L. Appointment reminders to reduce no show rates. JAMA 1983;250:1742–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith DM, Norton JA, Roberts SD, Maxey WA, McDonald CJ. Unexpected hospital admissions among patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1983;143:41–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith DM, Norton JA, Weinberger M, McDonald CJ, Katz BP. Increasing prescribed office visits. A controlled trial in patients with diabetes mellitus. Med Care 1986;24:189–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith DM, Weinberger M, Katz BP. Nonelective hospitalizations: predictable events in diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med 1987;2:168–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1984;100:130–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Commission of Professional and Hospital Activities. The international classification of diseases, 9th revision. Clinical modification. Ann Arbor: Edwards Brothers, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grizzle JE, Starmer CF, Koch GG. Analysis of categorical data by linear model. Biometrics 1969;25:489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller RG. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Center for Health Statistics. Haupt BJ. Utilization of short-study hospitals: annual summary for the United States, 1980. Series 13, No. 64. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-1725. Public Health Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 1982

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Center for Health Statistics. Collins JG. Physician visits: volume and interval since last visit, United States, 1980. Series 10, No. 144, DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 83-1572. Public Health Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, June 1983

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sechrest L. Experiments and demonstrations in health services research. Med Care 1985;23:677–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazzuca SA, Moorman NH, Wheeler ML, et al. The diabetes education study: a controlled trial of the effects of diabetes patient education. Diabetes Care 1986;9:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen SJ. Potential barriers to diabetes care. Diabetes Care 1983;6:499–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, the Divisions of General Medicine and Biostatistics of the Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Supported in part by Public Health Services Research Grant P60 20542 from the National Institutes of Health and by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D.M., Weinberger, M. & Katz, B.P. A controlled trial to increase office visits and reduce hospitalizations of diabetic patients. J Gen Intern Med 2, 232–238 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596446

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596446

Key words

Navigation