Skip to main content
Log in

Residential treatment and its alternatives: A review of the literature

  • Special Feature Residential Treatment And Its Alternatives
  • Published:
Child and Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review summarizes the literature for residential treatment, family preservation services, treatment foster care, and individualized services and evaluates characteristics of each model, methodological limitations of outcome studies, and treatment effectiveness with children. Although residential care is often viewed negatively, empirical evidence does not suggest differential levels of effectiveness compared to nonresidential alternatives. The results of some nonresidential outcome studies are promising, but efficacy claims should be viewed critically due to the absence of methodologically rigorous evaluations for both residential and nonresidential approaches. Future research should focus on establishing empirically grounded placement criteria, identifying what presenting problems are most amenable to each form of treatment, and maximizing the maintenance of treatment gains in the postdischarge environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, P. (1988). The future of residential treatment for children. In C. Schaefer & A. Swanson (Eds.),Children in residential care: Critical issues in treatment (pp. 1–16). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R.P., Courtney, M., Berrick, J.D., & Albert, V. (1994).From child abuse to permanency planning: Child welfare services pathways and placements. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bath, H.I., & Haapala, D.A. (1993). Intensive family preservation services with abused and neglected children: An examination of group differences.Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 213–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bath, H.I., Richey, C.A., & Haapala, D.A. (1992). Child age and outcomes correlates in intensive family preservation services.Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beker, J. (1991). Back to the future: Effective residential group care and treatment for children and the Fritz Redl legacy.Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 8(4), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beker, J. (1994). Does institutional care do more harm than good? No. In E. Gambrill & T. J. Stein (Eds.),Controversial issues in child welfare (pp. 279–288). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereika, G.M., & Mikkelsen, E.J. (1992). Individualized residential treatment as an alternative to acute psychiatric hospitalization for children and adolescents.Community Alternatives: International Journal of Family Care, 4, 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrick, J.D., Courtney, M., & Barth, R.P. (1993). Specialized foster care and group home care: Similarities and differences in characteristics of children in care.Children and Youth Services Review, 15, 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. (1991). The assessment of imminence of risk of placements: Lessons from a family preservation program.Children and Youth Services Review, 13, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. (1992). An evaluation of family preservation services: Fitting agency services to family needs.Social Work, 37, 314–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettelheim, B. (1950).Love is not enough. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettelheim, B. (1974).A home for the heart. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braukmann, C.J., Bedlington, M.M., Belden, B.D., Braukmann, P.D., Husted, J.J., Ramp, K.K., & Wolf, M.M. (1985). Effects of community-based group-home treatment programs on male juvenile offenders’ use and abuse of drugs and alcohol.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 11, 249–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B. (1981). Special foster care: A history and rationale.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 10, 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B., Simmens, F., & McKee, M. (1989). Doing it in public: A review of foster family treatment program development in Missouri.Children and Youth Services Review, 12, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B., & Snodgrass, R.D. (1990). Therapeutic foster care: Past and present. In P. Meadowcroft & B. Trout (Eds.),Troubled homes: A handbook of therapeutic foster care (pp. 1–20). Washington D.C.: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J.D., Burchard, S.N., Sewell, R., & VanDenBerg, J. (1993).One kid at a time: Evaluative case studies and description of the Alaska Youth Initiative demonstration project. Washington D.C.: CASSP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J.D., & Clarke, R.T. (1989). Individualized approaches to treatment: Project Wraparound. In A. Algarin, R. Friedman, A. Duchnowski, K. Kutash, S. Silver, & M. Johnson (Eds.),Second Annual Conference Proceedings from the Children’s Mental Health Services and Policy Conference: Building a Research Base. (pp. 51–57). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J.D., & Clarke, R.T. (1990). The role of individualized care in a service delivery system for children and adolescents with severely maladjusted behavior.The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17, 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J.D., Clarke, R.T., & Hamilton, R.I. (1990). Project Wraparound: A state-university partnership in training clinical psychologists to serve severely emotionally disturbed children. In P. Magrab & P. Wolford (Eds.),Improving psychological services for children and adolescents with severe mental disorders: Clinical training in psychology (pp. 179–184). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B.M. (1990). Mental health service use by adolescents in the 1970’s and 1980’s. In A. Algarin & R. Friedman (Eds.),Third Annual Conference Proceedings: A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Building A Research Base (pp. 3–19). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R.F., Hawkins, J.D., Wells, E.A., Miller, J., & Brewer, D. (1991). Evaluation of the effectiveness of adolescent drug abuse treatment, assessment of risks for relapse, and promising approaches for relapse prevention.The International Journal of the Addictions, 25, 1085–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, P., Moreland, S., & Reid, K. (1992). Enhanced services for foster parents: Effects on retention rates and outcomes for children.Child Welfare, 71, 387–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J.B. (1991). Using a specialized foster care community treatment model for children and adolescents leaving the state mental hospital.Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 266–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.B., Prange, M.E., Lee, B., Boyd, L.A., McDonald, B.A., & Stewart, E.S. (1994). Improving adjustment outcomes for foster children with emotional and behavioral disorders: Early findings from a controlled study on individualized services.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.T., Schaefer, M., Burchard, J.D., & Welkowitz, J.W. (1992). Wrapping community-based services around children with severe behavioral disorder: An evaluation of Project Wraparound.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colton, M.J. (1988).Dimensions of substitute child care. A comparative study of foster and residential care practices. Brookfield, VT: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J.F. (1991). Outcome research on residential treatment: Implications and suggested directions.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 348–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D.M., Pal, A., & Goldberg, K. (1994). Assessing the post-residential functioning of latency-aged conduct disordered children.Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 11, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, N., Evans, M.E., Lubrecht, J., & Schaeffer, D. (1994). The use of flexible service dollars in rural community-based programs for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick, P.W. (1988). Alaska Youth Initiative. In P. Greenbaum, R. Friedman, A. Duchnowski, K. Kutash, & S. Silver (Eds.),Conference Proceedings, Children’s Mental Health Services and Policy: Building a Research Base (pp. 59–61). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchnowski, A.J., Johnson, M.K., Hall, K.S., Kutash, K., & Friedman, R.M. (1993). The Alternatives to Residential Treatment study: Initial findings.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, R.P., & Durkin, A.B. (1975). Evaluating residential treatment programs for disturbed children. In M. Guttenberg & E.L. Struening (Eds.),Handbook of evaluation research: Vol. 2 (pp. 275–339). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensign, K. (1991).Prevention services in child welfare: An exploratory paper on the evaluation of family preservation and family support programs. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.E., Armstrong, M.I., Dollard, N., Kuppinger, A.D., Huz, S., & Wood, V.M. (1994). Development and evaluation of treatment foster care and family-centered intensive case management in New York.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 228–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L.H. (1991). Evaluating the impact of intensive family preservation services in New Jersey. In K. Wells & D. Biegel (Eds.),Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 47–71). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, P.W. (1989). Family preservation in foster care: Fit or fiction?Child and Youth Services, 12, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, H. (1988). Family-centered, home-based services in child protection: A review of the research.Social Service Review, 62, 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, P.M., Fraser, M.W., & Haapala, D.A. (1992). Intensive home-based family preservation services: An update from the FIT project.Child Welfare, 71, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M., Pecora, P., & Haapala, D. (1991).Families in crisis: The impact of family preservation services. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S.K., & Stroul, B.A. (1991). Descriptive research: One approach to the study of community-based services for children and adolescents who have serious emotional disturbances. In A. Algarin & R. Friedman (Eds.),Third Annual Conference Proceedings; A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Building a Research Base (pp. 197–211). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, N.B., Hodges, V.G., Blyth, B.J. & Bronson, D.E. (1989). Aftercare service development for children in residential treatment.Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 18, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, E., Bellew, J., & Penwell, L. (1978). Project Aftercare: Follow-up to residential treatment.Behavioral Disorders, 4, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R.P. (1989). The nature and potential of therapeutic foster family care programs. In R. Hawkins & J. Breiling (Eds.),Therapeutic foster care: Critical issues (pp. 5–36). Washington D.C.: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R.P., Almeida, M.C., & Samet, M. (1989). Comparative evaluation of foster-family-based treatment and five other placement choices: A preliminary report. A. Algarin, R. Friedman, A. Duchnowski, K. Kutash, S. Silver, & M. Johnson (Eds.),Second Annual Conference Proceedings, Children’s Mental Health Services and Policy: Building a Research Base (pp. 91–111). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R.P., Meadowcroft, P., Trout, B A., & Luster, W.C. (1985). Foster family-based treatment.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 3, 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, A. (1990). Residential treatment: Beyond time and space.Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 7, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, V., Guterman, N., Blythe, B., & Bronson, D. (1989). Intensive aftercare services for children.Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, (September, 1989), 397–404.

  • Hudson, J., Galaway, B., & Harmon, P. (1989). Providing competence building and normalizing environments: The specialist family placement program of human service associates.Child and Youth Services, 12, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J.M., Hawkins, J.D., & Catalano, R.F. (1986). Social support in aftercare services for troubled youth.Children and Youth Services Review, 8, 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J.M., & Whittaker, J.K. (1987). Parental involvement in children’s residential treatment: From preplacement to aftercare.Children and Youth Services Review, 9, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.A. (1991). Measuring outcomes. In K. Wells & D. Biegel (Eds.),Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 33–46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, B. (1984). The state of the art. In T. Philpot (Ed.),Group care practice: The challenge of the next decade (pp. 15–19). Surrey: Business Press International Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P.C., & Carruth, J.B. (1989). The community as advocate for youth: The programs and services of the National Youth Advocate Program, Inc.Child and Youth Services, 12, 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, J., Haapala, D., & Booth, C. (1991).Keeping families together: The Homebuilders model. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, J., Haapala, D., Booth, C., & Leavitt, S. (1990). The Homebuilders model. In J.K. Whittaker, J. Kinney, E.M. Tracy, & C. Booth (Eds.),Reaching high risk families: Intensive family preservation services (pp. 31–64). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, J., Madsen, B, Fleming, T., & Haapala, D. (1977). Homebuilders: Keeping families together.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W.W. (1982). Ecological factors in successful residential treatment.Behavioral Disorders, 7, 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourie, I.S., & Katz-Leavy, J. (1991). New directions for mental health services for families and children.Families in Society, 15, 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.D., Prentice-Dunn, S., Wilson, D.R., & Taylor, G.E. (1989). Issues in residential and inpatient treatment. In R. Lyman, S. Prentice-Dunn, & S. Gabel (Eds.),Residential and inpatient treatment of children and adolescents (pp. 3–22). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.D., & Wilson, D.R. (1992). Residential and inpatient treatment of emotionally disturbed children and adolescents. In C. Walker & M. Roberts (Eds.),Handbook of clinical child psychology (pp. 829–843). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura, S. (1981). Are services to prevent foster care effective?Children and Youth Services Review, 3, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio, A.N., & Marlow, W.D. (1972). Residential treatment of emotionally disturbed children: A review of the literature.Social Service Review, 46, 230–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcorft, P. (1989). Treating emotionally disturbed children and adolescents in foster homes.Children and Youth Services Review, 12, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, P., Thomlison, B., & Chamberlain, P. (1994). Treatment foster care services: A research agenda for child welfare.Child Welfare, 73, 565–581.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millham, S. (1984). The lessons of research. In T. Philpot (Ed.),Group care practice: The challenge of the next decade (pp. 87–97). Surrey: Business Press International Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K.J., & Chamberlain, P. (1994). Treatment foster care: Toward development of community-based models for adolescents with severe emotional and behavioral disorders.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1988).Factors contributing to success and failure in family based child welfare services: Executive summary. Iowa City: The University of Iowa, School of Social Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1990). How do we know that family-based services are effective?The Prevention Report, (Fall 1990). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, National Resource Center on Family Based Services, School of Social Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1991). Populations and outcomes in five family preservation programs. In K. Wells & D. Biegel (Eds.),Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 72–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, R. (1989). The New Brunswick therapeutic home program.Child and Youth Services, 12, 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt, G.L., Daly, D.L., & Richter, M.D. (1991). A longitudinal follow-up study of Boys’ Town residents: Implications for treating “at risk” youth. In A. Algarin and R. Friedman (Eds.),Fourth Annual Research Conference Proceedings; A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base (pp. 155–161). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecora, P.J., Whittaker, J.K., Maluccio, A.N., Barth, R.P., & Plotnick, R.D. (1992).The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. (1989). PATH: Putting foster parents in charge.Child and Youth Services, 12, 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S.I., & Strzelecki, S.C. (1990). Inpatient psychiatric treatment of children and adolescents: A review of outcome studies.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 847–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, D.E., & Jo, H.S. (1991). Substance abuse and psychiatric disorders: The dilemma of increasing incidence of dual diagnosis in residential treatment centers.Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 8, 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redl, F. (1966).When we deal with children. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L.D., Heckman, T., Carro, M.G., & Burchard, J.D. (1994). Satisfaction, involvement, and unconditional care: The perceptions of children and adolescents receiving wraparound services.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. (1992). Assessing family preservation programs.Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. (1994). [Review of the bookFamilies in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services].Children and Youth Services Review, 16, 461–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, J.S., Armentrout, J.A., Levin, S., & Herald, D. (1978). The Parent-Therapist program: Alternate care for emotionally disturbed children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 654–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, E.M. (1992). Prevention and treatment of juvenile problem behavior. A proposal for a socio-ecological approach.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 247–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuerman, J.R., Rzepnicki, T.L., Littell, J.H. & Budde, S. (1992). Implementation Issues.Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuerman, J.R., Rzepnicki, T.L., Littell, J.H. & Chak, A. (1993).Evaluation of the Illinois Family First placement prevention program: Final report. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I.M. (1994). Does institutional care do more harm than good? Yes. In E. Gambrill & T. J. Stein (Eds.),Controversial issues in child welfare (pp. 276–279; 288–289). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I.M., AuClaire, P., & Harris, L.J. (1991). Family preservation services as an alternative to out-of-home placement of adolescents: The Hennepin County experience. In K. Wells & D. Biegel (Eds.),Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 33–46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, R., Kennedy, K., & Bender, B. (1991). Critical issues for practice in residential treatment: The view from within.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 327–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L.A. (1979). Residential treatment. In J.D. Noshpitz (Ed.),Basic handbook of child psychiatry: Vol. 3 (pp. 231–262). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, E.M. (1991). Defining the target population for family preservation services. In K. Wells & D. Biegel (Eds.),Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 138–158). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, J.M. (1989). Mental health services for children: The state of the art.American Psychologist, 44, 188–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J.E. (1989). The Alaska Youth Initiative: An experiment in individualized treatment and education. In A. Algarin, R. Friedman, A. Duchnowski, K. Kutash, S. Silver, & M. Johnson (Eds.),Second Annual Conference Proceedings from the Children’s Mental Health Services and Policy Conference: Building a Research Base. (pp. 64–78). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J.E. (1993). Integration of individualized mental health services into the system of care for children and adolescents.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 20, 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hagen, J. (1988). Family work in residential treatment. In C. Schaefer & A. Swanson (Eds.),Children in residential care: Critical issues in treatment (pp. 134–144). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (1995). An evaluation of worker referral practices and perceptions of intensive family preservation services in Washington. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Webb, D.B. (1988). Specialized foster care as an alternative therapeutic out-of-home placement model.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 17, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. (1988). Approaches to description of children and families in need of mental health services. In P. Greenbaum, R. Friedman, A. Duchnowski, K. Kutash, & S. Silver (Eds.),Conference Proceedings: Children’s Mental Health Services and Policy: Building a Research Base (pp. 44–46). Tampa: Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. (1991a). Long-term residential treatment for children: Introduction.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 324–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. (1991b). Placement of emotionally disturbed children in residential treatment: A review of placement criteria.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 339–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K., & Biegel, D. (1992). Intensive family preservation services research: Current status and future agenda.Social Work Research and Abstracts, 28, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K., & Whittington, D. (1990). Prior services used by youths referred to mental health facilities: A closer look.Children and Youth Services Review, 12, 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K., & Whittington, D. (1993a). Characteristics of youths referred to residential treatment: Implications for program design.Children and Youth Services Review, 15, 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K., & Whittington, D. (1993b). Child and family functioning after intensive family preservation services.Social Services Review, 67, 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K., Wyatt, E., & Hobfoll, S. (1991). Factors associated with adaptation of youths discharged from residential treatment.Children and Youth Services Review, 13, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, C.E., Reuter, G., Struckman-Johnson, D., Yuan, Y.Y. (1992).Evaluation of State of Connecticut intensive family preservation services: Phase V annual report. Sacramento, CA: Walter R. McDonald & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K. (1979).Caring for troubled children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K., & Maluccio, A N. (1989). Changing paradigms in residential services for disturbed/disturbing children and youth: Retrospect and prospect. In R. Hawkins & J. Breiling (Eds.),Therapeutic foster care: Critical issues (pp. 81–102). Washington D.C.: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K., Overstreet, E.J., Grasso, A., Tripodi, T., & Boylan, F. (1988). Multiple indicators of success in residential youth care and treatment.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 143–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K., & Pecora, P. (1984). A research agenda for residential care. In T. Philpot (Ed.),Group care practice: The challenge of the next decade (pp. 87–97). Surrey: Business Press International Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K., & Pfeiffer, S.I. (1994). Research priorities for residential group child care.Child Welfare, 73, 583–601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y.Y., McDonald, W.R., Wheeler, C.E., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Rivest, M. (1990).Evaluation of AB 1562 In-Home Care Demonstration Projects: Volume I Final Report. Sacramento, CA: Walter R. McDonald & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.P. (1990). Notes on the history of adolescent inpatient and residential treatment.Adolescence, 25, 9–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.P. (1993). The little turtle’s progress: A reconsideration of the short versus long-term residential treatment controversy.Children and Youth Services Review, 15, 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, B.C., English, D.J. & Kouidou-Giles, S. Residential treatment and its alternatives: A review of the literature. Child Youth Care Forum 26, 7–51 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589364

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589364

Keywords

Navigation