Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing client satisfaction in a psychology training clinic

  • Articles
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Client satisfaction with services obtained at a clinical psychology training center was assessed. A modified version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed to obtain information about levels of satisfaction in such a setting and to evaluate training clinic-specific questions of interest, such as the impact of therapists’ experience on satisfaction. Results indicated that client satisfaction is multidimensional. Consistent with other studies, satisfaction was greater among clients who were in therapy for longer periods of time, who completed treatment, and who sought therapy rather than an evaluation. Reasons for dissatisfaction included a wish for more directiveness or advice in therapy and concerns over videotaping procedures. Implications of these results for clinic administrators are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lebow J: Research assessing consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment: A review of findings.Evaluation and Program Planning 1983; 6:211–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen D, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves W, et al.: Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale.Evaluation and Program Planning 1979; 2:197–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Serafica FC, Harway NI: The psychology department clinic: Its organization and development.Professional Psychology 1980; 11:741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Messer SB, Boals GF: Psychotherapy outcome in a university-based psychology training clinic.Professional Psychology 1981; 12:785–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harway NI, Serafica FC: Issues in the evaluation of the psychology department clinic.Professional Psychology 1977; 8:650–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halgin RP: Problems of service and research in psychology department clinics.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1986; 17:131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sabourin S, Bourgeois L, Gendreau P, et al.: Self-deception, impression management, and consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment.Psychological Assessment 1989; 1:126–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lebow J: Client satisfaction with mental health treatment: Methodological considerations in assessment.Evaluation Review 1983; 7:729–752.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lebow J: Acceptability as a simple measure in mental health program evaluation.Evaluation and Program Planning 1987; 10:191–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pascoe GC, Attkisson CC: The evaluation ranking scale: A new methodology for assessing satisfaction.Evaluation and Program Planning 1983; 6:335–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Essex D, Fox J, Groom J: The development, factor analysis, and revision of a client satisfaction form.Community Mental Health Journal 1981; 17:226–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. LeVois M, Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC: Artifact in client satisfaction assessment: Experience in community mental health settings.Evaluation and Program Planning 1981; 4:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenfield, TK: The role of client satisfaction in evaluating university counseling services.Evaluation and Program Planning 1983; 6:315–327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nunnally JC:Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones EE, Zupell CL: Impact of client and therapist gender on psychotherapy, process, and outcomes.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1982; 50:259–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Denner B, Halprin F: Clients and therapists evaluate clinical services.American Journal of Community Psychology 1974; 2:373–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baum OE, Felzer SB, D’Zmura TL, et al.: Psychotherapy, dropouts, and lower socioeconomic patients.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1996; 36:629–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meier RM: Consumer benefits and satisfaction at a day treatment center.Comprehensive Psychiatry 1981; 22:490–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Conte HR, Buckley P, Picard S, et al.: Relations between satisfaction with therapists and psychotherapy outcome.Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 1994; 3:215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perreault M, Leichner P, Sabourin S, et al.: Patient satisfaction with outpatient psychiatric services: Qualitative and quantitative assessments.Evaluation and Program Planning 1993; 16:109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin P, Sterne A, Hunter M: Share and share alike: Mutuality of expectations and satisfaction with therapy.Journal of Clinical Psychology 1976; 32:677–683.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Garfield S: Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In: Garfield S, Bergin A (Eds.):Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, New York: Wiley, 1978, pp. 213–256.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Strupp HH, Bloxom AL: Preparing lower class patients for group psychotherapy: Development and evaluation of a role induction film.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1973; 41:373–384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Slater V, Linn MW, Harris A: Asatisfaction with mental health treatment scale.Comprehensive Psychiatry 1982; 23:68–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, K.E., Kenning, M. Assessing client satisfaction in a psychology training clinic. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 23, 180–189 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519109

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519109

Keywords

Navigation