Abstract
Thesis: Macro-level social phenomena are implemented through the (social) actions and minds of the individuals. Without an explicit theory of the agents' minds that founds, agents' behavior we cannot understand macro-level social phenomena, and in particular how they work. AntiThesis: Mind is not enough: the theory of individual (social) mind and action is not enough to explain several macro-level social phenomena. First, there are pre-cognitive, objective social structures that constrain the actions of the agents; second, there are emergent, unaware or non-contractual forms of cooperation, organisation, and intelligence. Synthesis: The real challenge is how to reconcile, cognition with emergence, intention and deliberation with unknown or unplanned social functions and “social order”. Both objective structures and unplanned self-organising complex forms of social order and social function emerge from the interactions of agents and from their individual mental states; both these structures and self-organising systems feedback on agents' behaviors through the agents' individual minds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, H. (1968) Value, in D.L. Sills (Ed.),International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 16 (New York, The Macmillian Company & The Free Press), pp. 743–745.
Bicchieri, C. (1990) Norms of cooperation,Ethics, 100, pp. 838–861.
Bond, A.H. (1989) Commitments. Some DAI insights from Symbolic Interactionist Sociology, inAAAI Workshop on DAI. (Menlo Park, AAAI Inc).
Bond, A.H. & Gasser L. (Eds.) (1988)Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (San Mateo, Kaufmann).
Castelfranchi, C. (1982) Scopi esterni,Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, XXIII, pp.329–381.
Castelfranchi, C. (1990) Social power: A missed point in DAI, MA and HCI, in Y. Demazeau & J.P. Mueller (Eds.),Decentralized AI (Elsevier, North-Holland).
Castelfranchi, C. (1995) Guaranties for Autonomy in Cognitive Agent Architecture, in M.J. Woolridge & N.R. Jennings (Eds.),Intelligent Agents I, (Berlin, LANI-Springer).
Castelfranchi, C. (1997) Challenges for agent-based social simulation. The theory of social functions,Invited talk at SimSoc'97, Cortona, IP-CNR.
Castelfranchi, C. (1999) Prescribed Mental Attitudes in Goal-Adoption and Norm-Adoption,AI & Law, 1999, 7, pp. 37–50.
Castellfranchi, C. (1998) Modelling Social Action for AI Agents,Artificial, Intelligence, 6, pp. 157–182.
Castelfranchi, C. (forthcoming), Simulating with cognitive agents: the importance of Cognitive Emergence, in R. Conte, N. Gilbert, J. Sichman (Eds.),Multi Agent Systems and Agent Based Social Simulation—Proceedings of MABS (Berlin, Springer-Verlag).
Castelfranchi, C. & Conte R. (1992) Emergent functionality among intelligent systems: Cooperation within and without mindsAI & Society, 6, pp. 78–93.
Castelfranchi, C. & Conte, R. (1996) The Dynamics of Dependence Networks and Power Relations, inOpen Multiagent Systems.Proceedings of COOP'96 (Juan-les-Pins, INRIA).
Castelfranchi, C. & Conte, R. (1998) Limits of Economic and Strategic Rationality for Agents and MA Systems, in Magnus Boman (Ed.),Robotics and Autonomous Systems. Special Issue on “Multi-Agent Rationality”, 24, pp. 127–139.
Castelfranchi, C. & Falcone, R. (1998) Towards a Theory of Delegation for Agent-based Systems, in Magnus Boman (Ed.),Robotics, and Autonomous Systems. Special Issue on “Multi-Agent Rationality”, 24, pp. 141–145.
Castelfranchi, C., Miceli, M. & Cesta, A. (1992) Dependence relations, among autonomous agents, in Y. Demazeau, E. Werner (Eds),Decentralized AI-3 (Amsterdam, Elsevier).
Castelfranchi, C. & Parisi, D. (1984) Mente e scambio sociale,Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, XXV, pp. 45–72.
Cohen, P. & Levesque, H. (1991)Teamwork (Menlo Park, SRI-International, Technical Report).
Conte, R. & Castelfranchi, C. (1993) Norms as mental objects. From normative beliefs to normative goals, inProceedings of the 5th European Workshop on MAAMAW. Neuchatel—LNAI 957 (Springer, Berlin), pp. 186–98.
Conte, R. & Castelfranchi, C. (1994) Mind is not enough. Precognitive bases of social action, in J. Doran, N. Gilbert (Eds.),Simulating societies: The computer simulation of social processes (London, UCL Press).
Conte, R. & Castelfranchi, C. (1995)Cognitive and Social Action (London, UCL Press).
Cranach, M., von Kalbermatten, V., Indermuhle, K. & Gugler, B. (1982)Goal-directed action (London, Academic Press).
Elster, J. (1982) Marxism, functionalism and game-theory: the case for methological individualism,Theory and Society 11, pp. 453–81.
Gasser, L. (1991) ‘Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics,Artificial Intelligence, 47, pp. 107–38.
Gilbert, G.N. (1995) “Emergence” in social simulation, in G.N. Gilbert & R. Conte (Eds),Artificial societies: The computer simulation of social life (London, UCL Press).
Grosz, B. (1996) Collaborative, Systems,AI Magazine, summer 1996, pp. 67–85.
Grosz, B. & Kraus, S. (1996) Collaborative plans for complex group action,Artificial Intelligence, 86, pp. 269–357.
Jennings, N.R. (1993) Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems,The Knowledge Engineering Review, 3, pp. 223–50.
Kluckhohn, C. (1951)Values and value orientations in the theory of action (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Koehler, W. (1938)The place of value in a world of facts (New York, Liveright).
Krech, D., Crutchfield, R.S. & Ballachey, E.L. (1968)Individual in society: A textbook of social psychology (New York, McGraw-Hill).
Levesque, H.J., Cohen, P.R. & Nunes, J.H.T. (1990) On acting together, inProceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI-90 (AAAI Association-MIT Press, Boston). http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/JASSS.html
Malone, T.W. (1987) Modelling coordination in organizations and markets,Management Science, 33, pp. 1317–32.
Malone, T.W. (1988) Organizing information-processing systems: Parallels between human organizations and computer systems, in W. Zachary, S. Robertson, J. Black (Eds.),Gognition, Cooperation, and Computation (Norwood, Ablex).
MacIntyre, A. (1981)After virtue: A study in moral theory (Notre Dame, Univ. of Notre Dame Press).
Macy, R. (1998) Social Order in Artificial Worlds, inJASSS, 1,
Maslow, A.H. (Ed.) (1959)New knowledge in human values (New York: Harper & Bros).
Mataric, M. (1992) Designing Emergent Behaviors: From Local Interactions to Collective Intelligence, inSimulation of Adaptive Behavior 2 (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Mayr, E. (1982) Learning, development and culture, in H.C. Plotkin (Ed.),Essays in evolutionary epistemology (New York, John Wiley).
McFarland, D. (1983) Intentions as goals, open commentary to Dennet D.C. Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: the “Panglossian paradigm” defended,The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, pp. 343–90.
Miceli, M. & Castelfranchi C. (1989) A Cognitive Approach to Values,Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 2, pp. 169–94.
Miceli, M. & Castelfranchi, C. (1992)La cognizione del valore (Milano, Franco Angeli).
Miceli, M. & Castelfranchi, C. (forthcoming) The role of evaluation in cognition and social interaction, in K. Dautenhahn (Ed.),Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology (John Benjamins).
Miller, G., Galanter, E., Pribram, K.H. (1960)Plans and the structure of behavior (New York, Rinehart & Winston).
Parson, T. (1951)The social system (Glencoe, The Free Press).
Pepper, S.C. (1958)The sources of value (Berkeley, University of California Press).
Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P. & Sonenmerg E.A. (1992) Social plans: A preliminary report, in E. Werner & Y. Demazeau (Eds.),Decentralized AI-3, (Amsterdam, Elsevier).
Rokeach, M. (1974)The nature of human values, (New York, The Free Press).
Rosenblueth, A. Wiener, N. & J. Bigelow (1968) Behavior, Purpose, and Teleology, in W. Buckley (Ed.),Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist (Chicago, Aldine).
Rosenblueth, A. & Wiener N. (1968) Purposeful and Non-Purposeful Behavior, in W. Buckley (Ed.),Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist (Chicago, Aldine).
Sichman, J. (1995)Du Raisonnement Social Chez les Agents, Phd Thesis, Polytechnique-Laforia, Grenoble.
Shapira, Z. (1997)Organizational Decision Making, (Cambridge, CUP).
Steels, L. (1990) Cooperation between distributed agents through self-organisation, in Y. Demazeau & J.P. Muller (Eds),Decentralized AI (Amsterdam, Elsevier).
Tuomela, R. (1993) What is Cooperation,Erkenntnis, 38, pp. 87–101.
Tuomela, R. & Miller K. (1988) We-intentions,Philosophical, Studies, 53, pp. 367–389.
van Parijs, P. (1982) Functionalist marxism rehabilited. A comment to Elster,Theory and Society, 11, pp. 497–511.
Wilensky, R. (1983)Planning and Understanding. A Computational Approach to Human Reasoning (Reading, Addison-Wesley).
Williams, R.M. Jr. (1964) The concept of values, in J. Gould and W.L. Kolb (Eds.),A dictionary of the social sciences (Glencoe, The Free Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Thesis:Macro-level social phenomena are implemented through the (social) actions and minds of the individuals. Without an explicit theory of the agents' minds that founds agents' behavior we cannot understand and explain macro-level social phenomena, and in particular how they work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castelfranchi, C. Through the agents' minds: Cognitive mediators of social action. Mind & Society 1, 109–140 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512232
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512232