Abstract
The evolution of the propensity to forgive an offense was studied in a sample of 236 people from various age groups. The effect of a number of circumstances connected with the offense was considered: intent to harm, severity of consequences, cancellation of consequences, social proximity to the offender, apologies from the offender, and the attitude of others. The method was an application of information integration theory. A global increase in the propensity to forgive from adolescence to old age was observed. Several interactions between age and circumstances were found: (a) The effect of the cancellation factor was higher in young adolescents and in the very old than in the middle-aged, (b) the attitude of others and the restoration of harmony factors were important only in adolescents. Finally, the structure of the Forgiveness schema was shown to be an additive one, regardless of the age of the participants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. (1991a). Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blame. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory: Vol II (pp. 243–275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, N. H. (1991b). Moral-social development. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory: Vol III (pp. 137–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, N. H. (1996).A functional theory of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carter, K. S. (1977) Forgiveness revisited: God's and ours.Brethen Life and Thought, 22, 199–209.
Downie, R. S. (1965). Forgiveness.Philosophical Quarterly, 15, 128–134.
Enright, R. D. & the Human Development Study Group. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.),Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol. 1 (pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Enright, R. D., Santos, M. J. D. & Al-Mabuk, R. (1989). The adolescent as forgiver.Journal of Adolescence, 12, 95–110.
Helb, J. H., & Enright, R. D. (1993). Forgiveness as a psychotherapeutic goal with elderly females.Psychotherapy, 30, 658–667.
Hommers, W., & Anderson, N. H. (1991). Moral algebra of harm and recompense. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory: Vol II (pp. 101–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Howe, E. S., & Loftus, T. C. (1996) Integration of certainty, severity, and celerity information in judged deterrence value: Further evidence and methodological equivalence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 226–242.
Hughes, M. (1975). Forgiveness.Analysis, 35, 113–117.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.),Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Minas, A. C. (1975). God and forgiveness.Philosophical Quarterly, 25, 138–150.
Murphy, J. G. (1982) Forgiveness and resentment.Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 7, 503–516.
Neblett, W. R. (1974). Forgiveness and ideals.Mind.,83, 269–275.
Newman, L. E. (1987). The quality of mercy: On the duty to forgive in the Judaic tradition.Journal of Religious Ethics, 15, 141–150.
Przygotzki, N., & Mullet, E. (1997). Moral judgment and aging.European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 15–22.
Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C.-R. (1992).Current developments related to measuring forgiveness. Paper presenter at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, October.
Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C.-R., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., Sarinopoulos, I. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood.Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641–655.
Surber, C. E. (1977). Developmental processes in social inference: Averaging of intentions and consequences in moral judgment.Developmental Psychology, 13, 654–665.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Girard, M., Mullet, E. Forgiveness in adolescents, young, middle-aged, and older adults. J Adult Dev 4, 209–220 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511412
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511412