Skip to main content
Log in

Biomedical signal processing (in four parts)

Part 3 The power spectrum and coherence function

  • Tutorial Paper
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the third in a series of four tutorial papers on biomedical signal processing and concerns the estimation of the power spectrum (PS) and coherence function (CF) od biomedical data. The PS is introduced and its estimation by means of the discrete Fourier transform is considered in terms of the problem of resolution in the frequency domain. The periodogram is introduced and its variance, bias and the effects of windowing and smoothing are considered. The use of the autocovariance function as a stage in power spectral estimation is described and the effects of windows in the autocorrelation domain are compared with the related effects of windows in the original time domain. The concept of coherence is introduced and the many ways in which coherence functions might be estimated are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carter, G. C., Knapp, C. H. andNuttall, A. H. (1973) Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing.IEEE Trans.,AU-21, 337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challis, R. E. andKitney, R. I. (1982) The design of digital filters for biomedical signal processing (in three parts). Part 1.J. Biomed. Eng.,4, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challis, R. E. andKitney, R. I. (1983a) The design of digital filters for biomedical signal processing (in three parts). Part 2. —Ibid.,5, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challis, R. E. andKitney, R. I. (1983b) The design of digital filters for biomedical signal processing (in three parts). Part 3. —Ibid.,5, 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challis, R. E. andKitney, R. I. (1990) Biomedical signal processing (in four parts). Part 1 Time-domain methods.Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput.,28, 509–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challis, R. E. andKitney, R. I. (1991) Biomedical signal processing (in four parts). Part 2. The frequency transforms and their inter-relationships. —Ibid.,29, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. (1984)The analysis of time series: an introduction, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. F. andRao, K. R. (1982)Fast transforms, algorithms, analyses, applications. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, G. M. andWatts, D. G. (1968)Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden-Day Inc., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, A. H. andCarter, G. C. (1981) An approximation to the cumulative distribution function of the magnitude-squared coherence estimate.IEEE Trans. ASSP-29, 932–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, A. V. andSchafer, R. W. (1975)Digital signal processing. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tick, L. J. (1967) Estimation of coherency. InSpectral analysis of time series.Harris, B. (Ed.) John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, P. D. (1967) The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms.IEEE Trans.,AU-15, 70–73.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Winski, R. W. (1986) Adaptive techniques for signal enhancement in the human electroencephalogram. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  • Benignus, V. A. (1969a) Estimation of the coherence spectrum and its confidence interval using the fast Fourier transform.IEEE Trans.,AU-17, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benignus, V. A. (1969b) Estimation of coherence spectrum of non-Gaussian time series populations. —Ibid.,AU-17, 198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, G. C., Knapp, C. H. andNuttall, A. H. (1973) Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing. —Ibid.,AU-21, 337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, G. C. (1980) Bias in magnitude-squared coherence estimation (correspondence). —Ibid.,ASSP-28, 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. G. (1981) Transformed coherence functions of multivariate studies. —Ibid.,ASSP-29, 317–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, A. H. andCarter, G. C. (1976) Bias of the estimate of magnitude-squared coherence. —Ibid.,ASSP-24, 582–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, A. H. andCarter, G. C. (1981) An approximation to the cumulative distribution function of the magnitude-squared coherence estimate. —Ibid.,ASSP-29, 932–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisanenko, V. F. (1973) The retrieval of harmonics from a covariance function.Geophys. J.R. Ast. Soc.,33, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. D. (1981) Tests of coherence unbiasing methods.IEEE Trans.,ASSP-29, 321–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tick, L. J. (1967) Estimation of coherency. InSpectral analysis of time series.Harris, B. (Ed.), John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1930) Generalised harmonic analysis.Acta Math.,55, 117–258.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Winski, R. W. (1986) Adaptive techniques for signal enhancement in the human electroencephalogram. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Challis, R.E., Kitney, R.I. Biomedical signal processing (in four parts). Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 29, 225–241 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446704

Keywords

Navigation