Skip to main content
Log in

Left ventricular quantification with breath-hold MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography

  • Papers
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the reproducibility of measurements of left ventricular (LV) dimensions, function, and myocardial mass, segmentedk-space gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed on two occasions on 12 healthy volunteers. To compare the MR data, all volunteers underwent a two-dimensional echocardiography with determination of LV dimensions and function. The left ventricle was imaged during breath-hold by consecutive, contiguous short-axis views at end-diastole and end-systole. An average of eight short-axis views was needed to encompass the whole left ventricle. This fast MR sequence limited the total acquisition time to 12 min. LV volumes and masses were calculated after manual delineation of epicardial and endocardial surfaces by two observers in a blinded fashion.

Interstudy variability varied between 4.1% and 10.3% for LV end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume, respectively. Differences in interobserver variability were smaller and varied between 3.6% and 7.3% for LV ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume, respectively. Intraobserver variabilities ranged between 2.0% and 7.0% for LV ejection fraction and end-systolic volume, respectively. These variability percentages agree very well with other studies in literature using other MR sequences. No significant differences in LV dimensions or function were found between MR imaging and echocardiography. In conclusion, this MR sequence allows fast and reproducible LV quantification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doherty III NE, Seelos KC, Suzuki JI, Caputo GR, O'Sullivan M, Sobol SM, Cavero P, Chatterjee K, Parmley WW (1992) Application of cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for sequential evaluation of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol 19: 1294–1302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Markiewicz W, Sechtem U, Kirby R, Derugin N, Caputo GC, Higgins CB (1987) Measurement of ventricular volumes in the dog by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.J Am Coll Cardiol 10: 170–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald KM, Parrish T, Wennberg P, Stillman AE, Francis GS, Cohn JN, Hunter D (1992) Rapid, accurate and simultaneous noninvasive assessment of right and left ventricular mass with nuclear magnetic resonance imaging using the snapshot gradient method.J Am Coll Cardiol 19: 1601–1607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Debatin JF, Nadel SN, Paolini JF, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, Evans AJ, Beam C, Spritzer CE, Bashore TM (1992) Cardiac ejection fraction: phantom study comparing cine-MRI, radionuclide angiography and contrast ventriculography.J Magn Reson Imaging 2: 135–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Debatin JF, Nadel SN, Sostman HD, Spritzer CE, Evans AJ, Grist TM (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging—cardiac ejection fraction measurements. Phantom study comparing four diffrent methods.Invest Radiol 27: 198–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Higgins CB (1992) Which standard has the gold?J Am Coll Cardiol 19: 1608–1609.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakuma H, Fuyita N, Foo TKF, Caputo GR, Nelson SJ, Hartiala J, Shimakawa A, Higgins CB (1993) Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breath-hold cine MR imaging.Radiology 188: 377–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, Mayo J, Kondo C, Suzuki JI, Caputo GR, Higgins CB (1990) Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging.Radiology 174: 763–768.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Gould RG, Cassidy MM, Higgins CB (1987) Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging.Radiology 163: 697–702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caputo GR, Suziki JI, Kondo C, Cho H, Quaife RA, Higgins CB, Parker DL (1990) Determination of left ventricular volume and mass with use of biphasic spin-echo MR imaging: comparison with cine MR.Radiology 177: 773–777.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mogelvang J, Thomsen C, Mehlsen J, Bräckles G, Stubgaard M, Henriksen O (1986) Evaluation of left ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Heart J 7: 1016–1021.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellon E, Wambacq P, Schoeters F, Luckermans S, Marchal G, Suetens P (1992) Luci, a portable software package for different fields of image processing research.SPIE 1659: 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benjelloun H, Cranney GB, Kirk KA, Blackwell GG, Lotan CS, Pohost GM (1991) Interstudy reproducibility of biplane cine nuclear magnetic resonance measurement of left ventricular function.Am J Cardiol 67: 1413–1420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Longmore DB, Underwood SR, Hounsfield GN, Bland C, Poole-Wilson PA, Denison D, Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, Watanabe M, Fox K, Rees RSO, McNeilly AM, Burmal ED (1985) Dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance in studies of the heart.Lancet 1: 1360–1362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. van Rossum AC, Visser FC, Sprenger M, Van Eenige MJ, Valk J, Roos JP (1988) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for determination of left ventricular ejection fraction and comparison with angiography.Am J Cardiol 62: 628–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dilworth LR, Aisen AM, Mancini GBJ, Lande I, Buda AJ (1987) Determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by magnetic resonance imaging.Am Heart J 113: 24–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Rourke RA (1991) Relative patient costs: comparison of available techniques, inPrinciples and Practice of Cardiovascular Imaging (Pohost GM, O'Rourke RA, eds.), pp. 857–858. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matthaei D, Haase A, Henrich D, Dühmke E (1990) Cardiac and vascular imaging with an MR snapshot technique.Radiology 177: 527–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stehling MK, Turner R, Mansfield P (1991) Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second.Science 254: 43–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hunter GJ, Weiskoff RM, Kantor H, Hamberg LM, Campbell TA, Brady TJ (1992) Single breathold measurement of cardiac ventricular volumes using echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional MRI.Book of Abstracts, Vol. 2, 11th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Berlin, p. 2524.

  21. Edelman RR, Wallner B, Singer A, Atkinson DJ, Saini S (1990) Segmented turbo-FLASH: method for breathhold MR imaging of the liver with flexible contrast.Radiology 177: 515–521.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Atkinson DJ, Edelman RR (1991) Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turbo-FLASH sequence.Radiology 178: 357–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogaert, J.G., Bosmans, H.T., Rademakers, F.E. et al. Left ventricular quantification with breath-hold MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography. MAGMA 3, 5–12 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426395

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426395

Keywords

Navigation