Skip to main content
Log in

Schema specificity in subclinical syndrome depression: Distinctions between automatically versus effortfully encoded state and trait depressive information

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research examining information processing in subclinical depression has typically not sought to differentiate between depressive information processing structures. To examine this issue, an incidental recall paradigm was used to assess whether subclinically depressed individuals have self-schemas that facilitate the diffuse processing of any depressive information, or whether such structures are specific to state-relevant versus trait-relevant depressive information. In addition to the automatic information processing that is usually assessed in depression, effortful information processing was examined to determine if depressive cognitive dysfunctions were limited to automatic processing mechanisms. Results for subclinically depressed subjects showed a sensitivity to state depressive information processed automatically, and to trait depressive information processed effortfully. These data are consistent with the presence of a relatively specific, state self-referent depressive schema in subclinical depression, and suggest that, when presented with unfavorable information, subclinically depressed individuals will focus more attention on information that is qualitatively more negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bargh, J. A., & Tota, M. E. (1988). Context-dependent automatic processing in depression: Accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 925–939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 1, 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979).Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation.Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, W. F., John, O. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (1988). Conceptions of states and traits: Dimensional attributes with ideas as prototypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 541–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (1986). Cognitive-affective interaction: A test of the “specificity” and the “generality” hypotheses.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 607–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Brown, G. (1989). Cognitive mediation in general psychiatric outpatients: A test of the content-specificity hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 958–964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., & Howell, A. (1990). Ego involvement leads to positive self-schema activation and to a positivity bias in information processing.Motivation and Emotion, 13, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 268–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, P. (1964). A unidimensional depression scale for the MMPI.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 364–370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, P. A., & Kuiper, N. A. (1981). Schematic processing and self-reference in clinical depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 286–297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, K. S., & Shaw, B. F. (1987). Specificity and stability of self-referent encoding in clinical depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. S., & Beck, A. T. (1989). Depression versus anxiety: A test of the content specificity hypothesis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haaga, D., Dyck, M. J., & Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression.Psychological Bulletin, 110, 215–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E. (1984). Toward an information processing analysis of depression.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 443–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E. (1989). Affective confounds in social-cognitive research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 715–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E. (1990). Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 156–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E., Fidaleo, R. A., Friedberg, R., Shenk, J. L., & Bernet, C. Z. (1993).Content and mode of information processing in major depressive disorder. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Ingram, R. E., Kendall, P. C., Smith, T. W., Donnell, C., & Ronan, K. (1987). Cognitive specificity in emotional distress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 734–742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E., & Reed, M. J. (1986). Information encoding in depression: Findings, issues, and future directions. In R. E. Ingram (Ed.),Information processing approaches to clinical Psychology. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E., Smith, T. W., & Brehm, S. S. (1983). Depression and information processing: Self-schemata and the encoding of self-referent information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. L., & Ingram, R. E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding the use of the Beck Depression Inventory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1986). Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N. A., & Derry, P. A. (1982). Depressed and nondepressed content self-reference in mild depressives.Journal of Personality, 50, 67–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. H., Thompson, W. B., & Davenport, J. S. (1986). Trait information: Person schemata or semantic tags?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 179–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D. (1983). Negative thinking in depression: Cause, effect, or reciprocal relationship?Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 5, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D. (1988). Cognitive vulnerability to persistent depression.Cognition and Emotion, 2, 247–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzlaff, R. M., Wegner, D. M., & Roper, D. W. (1988). Depression and mental control: The resurgence of unwanted negative thoughts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 882–892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ingram, R.E., Partridge, S., Scott, W. et al. Schema specificity in subclinical syndrome depression: Distinctions between automatically versus effortfully encoded state and trait depressive information. Cogn Ther Res 18, 195–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357775

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357775

Key Words

Navigation