Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the dimensionality of optimism and pessimism using a multimeasure approach

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weighted least-squares confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor-analytic procedures were used to assess the dimensionality of three self-report instruments designed to measure optimism and pessimism: the Life Orientation Test (LOT), the Hopelessness Scale (HS), and the Optimism and Pessimism Scale (OPS). The LOT was found to be bidimensional, the HS unidimensional, and the OPS multidimensional. The HS was interpreted as measuring a unipolar pessimism dimension. Factor analyses performed on an item subset from the OPS that fit the definition of optimism and pessimism as generalized outcome expectancies also supported the two-dimensional model of optimism and pessimism. Differential correlations between separate optimism and pessimism indices and a measure of psychological stress provided partial further support for a two-dimensional model of optimism and pessimism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression.Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. (1987). Cognitive models of depression.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 1, 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Kovacs, M., & Garrison, B. (1985). Hopelessness and eventual suicide: A 10-year prospective study of patients hospitalized with suicidal ideation.American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 559–563.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861–865.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dember, W. N., & Brooks, J. (1989). A new instrument for measuring optimism and pessimism: Test-retest reliability and relations with happiness and religious commitment.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 365–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dember, W. N., Martin, S., Hummer, M. K., Howe, S., & Melton, R. (1989). The measurement of optimism and pessimism.Current Psychology: Research and Review, 8, 102–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1980).The Derogatis Stress Profile (DSP): A summary report. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1987). The Derogatis Stress Profile (DSP): Quantification of psychological stress.Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine, 17, 30–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items.Appled Psychological Measurement, 9, 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983).Item response theory: Application to psychological measurement. Homewood: Dow-Jones Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1990).SPSS LISREL 7 and PRELIS: User's guide and references. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. N., Wortman, C. B., Kusulas, J. W., Hervig, L. K., & Vickers, R. R. (1992). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1067–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1970). The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1985).Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natali-Alemañy, R. M. (1991).Moods, coping, and perception of daily life events: Are these factors related to optimism and pessimism? Unpublished doctoral dissertation., University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roznowski, M. A., Tucker, L. R., & Humphreys, L. G. (1991). Three approaches to determining the dimensionality of binary items.Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health Psychology, 5 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1987). Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: The influence of generalized expectancies on health.Journal of Personality, 55, 169–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Pope, M. K., Rhodewalt, R., & Poulton, J. L. (1989). Optimism, neuroticism, coping, and symptom reports: An alternative interpretation of the Life Orientation Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 640–648.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1987).MULTICORR (Version 2.4). Unpublished document. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. A., Halper, I. S., Clark, D. C., Scheftner, W., & Fawcett, J. (1992). An item response theory evaluation of the Beck Hopelessness Scale.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 579–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Luz C. Emiliano for her steadfast assistance in data collection and management. The participation of the third author was made possible by a Postdoctoral Scholarship from the Ministry of Education and Science of Spain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, E.C., D'Zurilla, T.J. & Maydeu-Olivares, A. Assessing the dimensionality of optimism and pessimism using a multimeasure approach. Cogn Ther Res 18, 143–160 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357221

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357221

Key Words

Navigation